Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterslactapp

8,141 results

0.95s

  • State v. Thomas

    928 So. 2d 649 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 2006

    Relators argue that they clearly set forth their right to a speedy trial. … Relators clearly asserted their right to a speedy trial.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Elio Motors, Inc. v. La. Motor Vehicle Comm'n

    268 So. 3d 1132 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 2019

    manufacturing facilities in the United States that produce fuel-efficient advanced technology vehicles (ATVs) or qualifying components, or who perform engineering integration in the U.S. for ATVs or qualifying components … The asterisk next to the price referred the reader to the same qualifying language noted above.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boudreaux v. State, Department of Transportation

    2004 La.App. 1 Cir. 0985 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 10, 2005

    Some of the representative plaintiffs did try to salvage appliances and furnishings by either having qualified repairmen inspect, clean, and dry out damaged appliances or having friends or relatives with such credentials … In assignment of error number eight, the State asserts that the trial court’s determination that all of. the class plaintiffs who submitted claim forms are entitled to mental anguish damages was clearly wrong.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Boyd

    999 So. 2d 40 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 2008

    Our review of the record establishes that (1) the bicycle's purchase price was approximately $525.00; (2) while she could not remember exactly, Mrs. … It is not necessary that an owner be qualified as an expert in order to testify as to the value of the thing owned by him. Here the owner was not shown to lack knowledge of the value of the *48 thing stolen.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Lee

    208 So. 3d 492 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 12, 2016

    Tyler approached the vehicle, clearly in plain view of the arresting officer. … Townly, the State established that the large volume of marijuana recovered from the scene was intended for distribution.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Coleman v. Caddo Parish School Bd.

    635 So. 2d 1238 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 2, 1994

    (b) Emphasize that abstinence from sexual activity is a way to avoid unwanted pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, including acquired immune deficiency syndrome, and other associated health problems. … These passages clearly show the intent of the curriculum to present its message in moral terms.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Carr

    618 So. 2d 1098 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 23, 1993

    Initially, we note that trial counsel's conduct in the instant case is clearly distinguishable from that of defense counsel in Wiley . … Moreover, as will be noted herein, we find this argument to be meritless, since defendant clearly abandoned this issue.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brice Building Co. v. Southland Steel Fabricators, Inc.

    194 So. 3d 1285 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 2016

    “A manifest disregard of the law refers to error which is obvious and capable of being readily and instantly perceived by an average person qualified to serve as an arbitrator.” Id. … The doctrine implies that the arbitrator appreciates the existence of a clearly governing legal principle but decides to ignore it. Welch , 95-2085 at p. 6, 677 So.2d at 524 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Jn

    984 So. 2d 910 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 7, 2008

    The trial court clearly accepted Jenny's testimony as credible, and it is not the function of this Court to reassess that credibility call, or to reweigh the evidence. State v. … In the matter sub judice, the record does not establish the reliability of the in-field identification.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Walters

    2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 0959 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 5, 2014

    Whether or not a duty exists is a question of law for the court to decide based upon the facts and circumstances of the case as established in the evidence of record. Lemann v. … R.S. 34:851.18, is also supported by well-established maritime law.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schilling v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.

    487 So. 2d 127 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1986

    McFate was qualified as an expert in mechanical engineering with expertise in dynamics. … The situation presented in the case sub judice is clearly distinguishable from the factual situation presented in Sinitiere v. Lavergne, supra .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State of Louisiana v. Stacy Tyrone Johnson, Jr.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 2019

    Again, Defendant’s motion failed to establish the degree of underrepresentation. … Even if considered a cognizable community group, Defendant has not established that the temporary exclusion of this group from the jury venire because of an established process is an unreasonable means of

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stevenson v. Bolton Co., Inc.

    484 So. 2d 678 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1986

    The medical evidence clearly establishes plaintiff's long history of back and leg pain related to numerous traumas, as well as to female and urinary disorders. … The author of Fruge (Judge Tate) qualified the Fruge quote used by the majority in a dissenting opinion in Frame v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. State

    776 So. 2d 519 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 2000

    Ins., 587 So.2d 5, 8 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991) (citations omitted), the proof required for an award of future medical expenses was addressed: Future medical expenses, like any other damages, must be established with some degree … Jackson's testimony initially indicated total expenses of $15,200.00; this figure was qualified by his additional testimony that an insurer would only approve a shorter stay.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Segura

    13 La.App. 3 Cir. 398 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 2013

    Upper-level Iberia Parish officials were clearly connected with the newspaper article. … The Goodson court clearly delineated degrees of taint for potential jurors.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Janet Troquille v. Stirling Properties, Inc.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 2014

    Troquille ran into should have been more clearly marked. He based his opinion on a “code,” but did not specify which code. Mrs. Troquille introduced Mr. … Wood qualified. We find the trial court erred in ruling the affidavit of Mr. Wood inadmissible. We now turn to the question of whether summary judgment was appropriate if the affidavit of Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Suazo v. Suazo

    970 So. 2d 642 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 2007

    The trial court clearly erred as a matter of law in finding Ms. Suazo in contempt of court for missing two appointments with Dr. … Furthermore, no proof of contempt beyond a reasonable doubt was established. 2. The trial court manifestly erred and abused its discretion in denying Ms.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Thompson

    2016 La.App. 4 Cir. 0409 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 2016

    He requested the trial court establish a monetary value for the seized property of $635,000.00. … The LDWF also contends that it is statutorily immune from any liability under La.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • New Orleans Private Patrol Service, Inc. v. Shorts

    908 So. 2d 73 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 2005

    Shorts was qualified for unemployment compensation benefits. Ms. … Additionally, in reviewing your request for vacation dated June 28, 2003, you clearly state that your vacation would conclude on Thursday, July 17, 2003.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Christopher J. Bruno v. Jennifer M. Medley, Individually and "Jennifer M. Medley Campaign Fund"

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 2020

    Sullivan[, supra,]” appellate courts “must exercise independent judgment and determine whether the record establishes actual malice with convincing clarity.” Bose Corp. v. … A district court is “afforded wide discretion” in admitting expert testimony, and the “district court’s decision to qualify an expert will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.” Cheairs v. State ex rel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.