Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterslactapp

8,141 results

1.63s

  • Melancon v. Hyatt Corp.

    589 So. 2d 1186 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1991

    Defendant first argues that the jury was clearly wrong in finding that plaintiffs had proved the necessary elements to establish defamation. … We cannot say that the jury's conclusion in this regard is clearly wrong.

    Declined to follow in part by Hines v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co., 1993 La. App. LEXIS 79 (1993)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Pasqua v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury

    94 La.App. 3 Cir. 1196 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 1, 1995

    Landry Parish Police Jury in its method of appropriation of the Fund has been established. … In addition, the plaintiffs’ petition also establishes a potential claim for noncompliance with the statutory requirements of the Parish Transportation Fund Act.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Williams

    615 So. 2d 1009 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 5, 1993

    Thus, the objection was untimely, since the question clearly sought to elicit the witness' response in the form of an opinion or inference. … Defendant argues this testimony was outside the doctor's field of expertise because the doctor was not qualified as an expert in ballistics or forensic science and was not otherwise qualified to testify as to the cause and

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Boguille v. Chambers

    96 La.App. 4 Cir. 1173 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1996

    That argument, how *589 ever, ignores the provisions of La.R.S. 9:2798.1(B), which grants governmental units qualified immunity from liability “based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform … We hold that discretionary immunity absolves it from liability in its decision to set the territorial limits of the ordinance’s application at 225 feet north of the dolphin.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • John Nickelson v. Henry Whitehorn and Kyle R. Ardoin, in his official capacity as Louisiana Secretary of State

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 12, 2023

    In his post-trial brief, Nickelson argued that the testimony and evidence clearly established double voting by two individuals, voting by four fully interdicted individuals, and multiple irregularities in mail-in ballots … Clearly, irregularities existed in the voting for the office of Caddo Parish Sheriff. Nickelson has established that two voters illegally voted twice in clear violation of La. R.S 18:1305.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Heirs of Tarver v. State, Department of Health & Hospitals

    94 La.App. 1 Cir. 1121 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1995

    So.2d 431, 432-33 (La.App. 5th Cir.1986), writ denied, 500 So.2d 428 (La.1987), wherein *1349 the court stated that an employee is entitled to recover vacation pay accruing prior to his discharge, unless the employers’ established … As the pleadings clearly disclose that the State paid the required 300 hours in accordance with Civil Service Rule 11.10, the trial court was correct in dismissing this suit on the exception of no cause of action.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • White v. Taylor

    5 So. 2d 337 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 31, 1941

    Clearly, plaintiff has stated a cause of action and a right of action. A few days before the case was argued here the plaintiff died. … His widow was qualified as administratrix and has been made party plaintiff instead of her deceased husband.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mitchell v. Popiwchak

    677 So. 2d 1050 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1996

    The evidence does not establish that the waiver in the Act of Sale was brought to the attention or explained to the Mitchells. The Notary did not testify. … The trial court has great discretion whether to qualify an expert witness and has wide latitude whether an expert has the competence, background and experience to qualify. Clement v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Vestal v. Kirkland

    11 La.App. 3 Cir. 419 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 23, 2011

    that the fact finder is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous. … The medical testimony clearly established he would be unable to work in any of these positions in the future because of his injuries. Dr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Dimitri

    138 So. 2d 618 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1962

    that the very nature of the strong and spontaneous emotions involved herein has provoked, more than usual, conflicting recitations of fact; however, we believe that the evidence adduced in the course of the trial hereof clearly … Given this belief based on reasonable grounds, immunity from liability is not judicially withdrawn because some other reasonable man may have perceived the idea of disabling the assailant instead of shooting him.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Hess v. Magnolia Behavioral Healthcare, L.L.C.

    2015 La.App. 1 Cir. 1312 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 2016

    Hess’s PTO: hours were reduced by the payment of her final check. ■ Magnolia counters that the evidence clearly establishes, as was confirmed by the trial court, that Ms. … Global Data Systems, Inc., 2005-1227 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/5/06) , 926 So.2d 145, 149 (provision in employee vacation policy did not qualify as clear, written policy establishing that vacation time granted by employer was a “

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Katherine Winzer v. Bienville Parish School Board and Dr. Byron Lyons, In His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Bienville Parish School Board

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 3, 2025

    Appointee shall be removable from his or her position for such cause in accordance with the procedures established by law. … As such, Winzer was qualified for both positions, and no additional training was necessary.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rabai v. First Nat. Bank of Gonzales

    492 So. 2d 90 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 24, 1986

    A real estate appraiser qualified as an expert, Caleb Mire, testified that the house and lot suffered a 15% diminution in value as a result of its proneness to flood. The house and lot sold for $69,900.00. … Clearly the bank in such a case is not a "manufacturer". Hence, bad faith must be proved. Millspaw, supra .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Amy LeBlanc Goodson and William R. Goodson, Jr. v. City of Zachary and Jelks Construction, LLC

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 10, 2021

    They averred that the City was negligent in numerous respects, including: (I) failing to design or construct a bleacher canopy structure free of vice and defect; (2) failing to hire qualified personnel to design … R.S. 9:2795, Louisiana's Recreational Use Immunity Statute, which affords tort immunity for parks owned by public entities, applied so as to immunize it from liability for 3 plaintiffs

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Haspel & Davis v. Bd. of Levee Com'rs

    680 So. 2d 159 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1996

    According to the transcript, the trial court concluded that Act 233 did not transfer ownership because there are no words clearly evidencing that intent. … This Court held that Act 99 of 1924 authorized the expropriations and at that time the Levee Board was immune by virtue of sovereign immunity. Henry v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Verrett v. Louisiana World Exposition, Inc.

    503 So. 2d 203 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 12, 1987

    The contract between Landis and LWE, which was placed in evidence, clearly shows that Landis was an independent contractor. … A principal is immune from tort suits by the employees of its contractor. Smith v. Cotton's Fleet Service, Inc., 500 So.2d 759 (La., 1987).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Community Chest v. Union Mission Ass'n

    30 So. 2d 131 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 27, 1947

    This question has been definitely settled by the jurisprudence of our State, and we find that the principle applicable is clearly set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court in the case of Layne Bowler Co. v. … intent of a specific agreement, has been granted the supervision, administration and control of a particular institution, and, on the other hand, to contend that it is without right to properly staff such an institution with qualified

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Glass v. First United Pentecostal Church

    676 So. 2d 724 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1996

    Nonetheless, Joiner struck a balance favoring the religious organization in recognizing a qualified privilege. at 105. … This argument is clearly not within the jurisdiction of the civil courts of this state.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Kramer v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.

    999 So. 2d 101 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 2008

    However, these statements merely establish the occurrence of the flash, the sudden movement, and the ultimate crash. … Agarwal was qualified, and the defendants conceded this point. Likewise, the third prong of the test was clearly met as the trial court stated in its reasons for judgment that he had qualified Dr.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Narcisse v. Continental Ins. Co.

    419 So. 2d 13 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1982

    It was established that the door was made of metal, weighed 112 pounds, [1] and lacked a doorstop or closure. Dr. Louis V. … Testimony as to safety or design of doors would have clearly been outside of his field of expertise, as the trial court correctly concluded.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.