Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,674 results
0.99s
Louisiana Attorney General Reports · May 24, 2011
City of New Orleans v. Louisiana Assessors' Retirement and Relief Fund , 2005-2548 (La. 10/1/07), 986 So.2d 1 at 12 . … , levee board, police jury, or parish council. (2) Any member of a city council, city-parish council, or town council or any alderman or any constable. (3) Any member of a board or commission established by the state of Louisiana
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 1988
John the Baptist Parish Association of Educators v. … Brown , 1985, 462 So.2d 1269 , an appellate court of this state held that unless a proposition or question was specifically authorized by the Louisiana Constitution, law or a home rule charter, such elections were prohibited
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1994
The applicable statute is LSA-R.S. 42:4.2 (2) which states as follows: "`Public body' means village, town, and city governing authorities; parish governing authorities; school boards and boards of levee and port commissioners … The Louisiana Supreme Court in Spain v. Louisiana High School Athletic Association, 398 So.2d 1386 (La. 1981) held a private body subject to the open meetings law because of its function. In Seghers v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Apr 27, 2010
. ` In Board of Directors of the Industrial Development Board of the City of Gonzales, Louisiana, Inc. v. … No. 05-0036 concluded that a school board may use public funds to reimburse its school board members the average cost associated with a board member obtaining and maintaining a home based internet service. Atty. Gen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1999
Significantly, in Strawitz v. … Based upon these provisions, and with reliance upon Strawitz v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · May 9, 2006
Gautreau v. Board of Elec. Examiners of City of Baton Rouge, 167 So.2d 425 (La.App. 1964). … Respondent Co. v. Krauss Co., 9 So.2d 303 , 200 La. 959 (La. 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 2002
Ordinance #01-2001-02 indicates that it was adopted by the Mayor and Board on January 8, 2001. … Daily Advertiser v. Trans-La., 612 So.2d 7 , 22 (La. 1993). Regulatory lag is a risk that is always on utilities absent extraordinary circumstances. Louisiana Power Light Com v. Louisiana Pub.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1993
It is the opinion of this office that the "W-2" form of a school board employee may not itself be disclosed under the Public Records Act. … Swisher v. Department of the Air Force, 495 F. Supp. 337 (D.C. Mo. 1980), affirmed 660 F.2d 369 (8th Cir. 1981). Previous opinions of this office are in accord with this position. See, e.g., Op. Atty. Gen.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 2010
See Thibodeaux v. Hernandez , 97-602 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/29/97) , 702 So.2d 1157 , and Lee v. Grimmer , 99-2196 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/22/00) , 775 So.2d 1223 . However, the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in Grant v. … While we find that the police chief is allowed to make recommendations before the municipality acts, and indeed must do so under La.Rev.State. 33:423 , we reject the holdings of Lee v. Grimmer and Thibodeaux v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1992
Lapeze v. Amoco Production Company, 655 F. Supp. 1 (M.D. LA 1987); Vincent v. Bullock, 187 So. 35 (La. 1939); Caple v. Green, 545 So.2d 1222 (LA App. 2 Cir. 1989); Dejoie v. … R.S. 42:3 refers to "the term of office of the membership of board electing them", and contemplates only boards whose members serve concurrently with each other.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 2000
of aldermen for that purpose, authorize the mayor to thereafter appoint a marshal with the approval of the board of aldermen. … See, Fuller v. Police Jury of Grant Parish , 144 So.2d 766 ; McGee v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish , 66 So.2d 408 . We hope that this opinion addresses all of your concerns.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 24, 1997
Liter v. City of Baton Rouge, 258 La. 175 , 245 So.2d 398 (1971). … State ex rel, Singelmenn v. Morrison, 57 So.2d 238 (La.App. Orleans Cir. 1952) writ denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 2005
VII, Sec 14 has been interpreted by the Louisiana Supreme Court in City of Port Allen v. … In accordance with City of Port Allen v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Apr 20, 1994
The court in Restivo v. … City of Shreveport v. Curry, 357 So.2d 1078 (La. 1978); National Food Stores of La, Inc. v. Cefalu, 280 So.2d 903 (La. 1973).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 1993
Aldrich Co. v. … Of course, the School Board may also choose to cancel the original solicitation under the authority of La.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 2011
See La.Rev.Stat. 38:2212 (A)(1)(b); Hamp's Construction, LLC. v. City of New Orleans , 2005-0489 (La. 2/22/06), 924 So.2d 104 ; Beverly Construction Company, L.L.C. v. Parish of Jefferson , 2007-847 (La. … Wilkin v. Dev Con Builders, Inc. , 561 So.2d 66 (La. 1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Apr 19, 2001
In Lassalle v. … Nos 90-541, 81-350, that found a school board could regulate citizens right to speak at school board meetings, we recognize that the Legislature has established the right to allow public comment at any meeting of the school
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 7, 2010
See Special Counsel v. Carter , 45 M.S.P.R. 447 (1990), at page 453. The federal agency responsible for enforcing the Hatch Act is the Merit Systems Protection Board (the MSPB). … However, if the Merit System Protection Board finds by unanimous vote that the violation does not warrant removal, a penalty of not less than 30 days' suspension without pay shall be imposed by direction of the Board. 2 The
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 2011
See Special Counsel v. Carter , 45 M.S.P.R. 447 (1990), at page 453. … However, if the Merit System Protection Board finds by unanimous vote that the violation does warrant removal, a penalty of not less than 30 days suspension without pay shall be imposed by direction of the Board. 3 The Office
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 2009
Hardy v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen, City of Eunice , 348 So.2d 143 , 147 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1977). … In Thomas v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna