Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.64s
202 La. 951 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 8, 1943
In the case of Leovy v. … Hence it was held, in Airey v.
Cited 3 timesPublished111 La. 927 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 1, 1904
Was employed by the water and sewerage board to ascertain who were the owners of the 26 squares desired to be expropriated by that board, and also the value of the property. W. R. M. … (Redfield’s Ed.) vol. 1, §§ 493, 99, 498, 100; Morgan v. Yarborough, 13 La. 76 , 33 Am. Dec. 553 ; Moussier v. Zunts, 14 La. Ann. 15 ; City of New Orleans v. Sheppard, 10 La. Ann. 268 ; Hill v. Spangenberg, 4 La.
Cited 6 timesPublishedInterstate Trust & Banking Co. v. Irwin
138 La. 325 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 2, 1915
See Wright v. Gurley, 133 La. 746 , 63 South. 310 . … It has been decided, with regard to this note, in Wright et al. v.
Cited 28 timesPublished157 La. 333 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 1, 1924
In the case of Wend v. … In the case of Barbara Weller v. Jacob Von Hoven, 42 La.
Cited 7 timesPublishedHibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. Dresser
145 La. 133 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 5, 1919
The president of this company answered the interrogatories virtute officii and also under authority of the hereinafter referred to resolution of the board of directors. … Dugue, 113 La. 273 , 36 South. 960 , Rose v. Whaley, 14 La. Ann. 374 ; Tapp v. Green, 22 La. Ann. 42 , and Elder v.
Cited 3 timesPublished199 La. 250 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 10, 1941
Nimmo v. Walker, Executor, 14 La.Ann. 581 ; Succession of McNamara, 48 La.Ann. 45 , 18 So. 908 ; Succession of Palmer, 137 La. 190 , 68 So. 405 ; Succession of Oliver, 184 La. 26 , 165 So. 318 . … Nimmo v. Walker, Executor, supra; Copse v. Eddins, 15 La.Ann. 528 ; Succession of Palmer, supra; Succession of Oliver, supra. This suit therefore is not barred by prescription.
Cited 10 timesPublishedCity of New Orleans v. Joseph Rathborne Land Co.
209 La. 93 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 29, 1945
(Brown et al. v. Huger, 21 How. [305], 306 [ 16 L.Ed. 125 ]).” … McClintock v. Rogers, 11 Ill. 279 . In Meyer v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedBillieson v. City of New Orleans
749 So. 2d 644 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 29, 1999
749 So.2d 644 (1999) Casey BILLIESON, et al. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, Housing Authority of New Orleans, C.J. Brown Public Housing Management Co., XYZ Insurance Co., and Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Asso. No. 99-C-0946.
Cited 0 timesPublished737 So. 2d 701 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 18, 1999
Count V: On or around December 7, 1994, Jada Marie Ebron, Dorothy Mayberry and Tracey Mayberry were involved in an automobile accident. Ms. … Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Krasnoff, 502 So.2d 1018 (La.1987). DECREE Accordingly, it is ordered that respondent, Jose L.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 17, 2023
V, § 5(B). … Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Reis, 513 So. 2d 1173 (La. 1987).
Cited 0 timesPublished970 So. 2d 970 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 14, 2007
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Reis, 513 So.2d 1173 (La.1987). … Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Whittington, 459 So.2d 520 (La.1984).
Cited 1 timesPublishedBd. of Adm'rs of Tulane Education Fund v. La. Tax Commission
709 So. 2d 705 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 30, 1998
709 So.2d 705 (1998) BOARD OF ADMINISTRATORS OF the TULANE EDUCATION FUND v. LOUISIANA TAX COMMISSION. Thomas L. ARNOLD, in his capacity as assessor for the Fifth Municipal District for the Parish of Orleans v. … BOARD OF ADMINSITRATORS OF the TULANE EDUCATION FUND. No. 97-C-2745. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 30, 1998. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ. TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
Cited 6 timesPublished329 So. 2d 181 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 23, 1976
State v. Lucien, 323 So.2d 784 (La.1975); State v. Brown, 288 So.2d 339 (La.1974); State v. Maiden, 258 La. 417 , 246 So.2d 810 (1971). … This precedent was followed in State v. Brown, 288 So.2d 339 (La.1974), and in State v.
Cited 56 timesPublished181 La. 554 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 26, 1934
In City of New Orleans v. U. Koen Co., 38 La. … Commonwealth v. Vetterlein, 63 A. 192, 193 , 214 Pa. 21 (quoting Commonwealth v. Campbell, 33 Pa. 380 ).
Cited 33 timesPublished782 So. 2d 566 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 16, 2001
Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Reis, 513 So.2d 1173 (La.1987). … Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Whittington, 459 So.2d 520 (La.1984).
Cited 2 timesPublishedGiambelluca v. Parish of St. Charles
688 So. 2d 513 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 21, 1997
Cited 0 timesPublished601 So. 2d 1355 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 22, 1992
Smith v. State, 523 So.2d 815, 822 (La. 1988). The plaintiff, of course, bears the initial burden of proof. Brown v. … Bloxom v. Bloxom, 512 So.2d 839, 843 (La. 1987); Brown v. Sears, 514 So.2d 439, 444 (La.1987); Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 484 So.2d 110 (La.1986); Hunt, supra .
Cited 230 timesPublished653 So. 2d 548 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 21, 1995
The Indigent Defender Board (“IDB”) is obligated to pay the court-approved expenses of all defendants who have been determined by a trial court to be “indigent.” As we stated in State v. … The trial court shall only order the Indigent Defender Board to pay those defense costs approved by the trial court which the defendant himself is unable to pay.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLouisiana Farm Bureau Cotton Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. Huckabay
167 La. 47 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 29, 1928
This is a companion suit to the case of Louisiana Farm Bureau Cotton Growers’ Co-operative Association v. R. … Brown (No. 27945 of the docket of this court) 118 So. 604 ,1 this day decided, and for the same reasons the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed, at appellant’s cost.
Cited 0 timesPublished151 La. 541 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 8, 1922
The decree, dismissing the suit, was founded upon the ruling of this court in Knoll v. Levert, 136 La. 241 , 66 South. 959 . … The court said : “It therefore follows that, as it was the duty of the board of directors of the Shirley Planting Company to call the annual meeting of stockholders, the mandamus should have been directed to said board, and
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna