Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.26s
373 So. 2d 539 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 2, 1979
In re John Brown, applying for writ of certiorari. Orleans Parish. No. 256-579. Writ denied. SUMMERS, C. J., absent.
Cited 0 timesPublished371 So. 2d 268 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 21, 1979
In re Donald Reed Brown, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Calcasieu. No. 11994 -78. Writ denied. Adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction.
Cited 0 timesPublished352 So. 2d 1035 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 9, 1977
Brown applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Orleans. Denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished351 So. 2d 153 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 27, 1977
In re: Evans Brown applying for writs of certiorari and/or review, mandamus and prohibition. Writs denied.
Cited 0 timesPublished293 So. 2d 186 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 29, 1974
Brown, applying for Writs of Certiorari (Review) and/or Prohibition and Mandamus. Writ granted. (See order).
Cited 0 timesPublished10 La. Ann. 350 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 15, 1855
Ames v. Merchants’ Insurance Co., 2 An., 594; McMuller v. Jewell, 3 An., 139. II. … process is requisite, is authorized to make the affidavit and sign the attachment bond, so as to bind the creditor without a special procuration; and it was so held by the District Judge, who cited the case of Dwight & Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished20 La. 486 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 15, 1868
to Brown, Brothers &Co. … The succession is in no worse position as to Brown, Brothers & Co., by the sale to Johnson, than if no sale had been made.
Cited 0 timesPublished4 La. Ann. 270 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 15, 1849
Routh, in his answer, had pleaded, among various other matters, that any judgment against him must be rendered payable in these bank notes, and made oath, which was filed on the 18th June, 1844, that one of the partners of Brown … On the 6th of May, 1846, another amended petition was filed by the plaintiff to the following effect: “That since the institution of this suit Brown, Brothers 8f Co., for whose use plaintiff sues, have become the absolute
Cited 0 timesPublished6 La. Ann. 423 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 15, 1851
Brown v. Hughes et al., 2d Ann. 623. 15 L. R. 139. … This court, in the case of Byrne v. Riddle, 3d Ann. 670, manifested their disapprobation of applying this technical and inconvenient rule of the code to cases which were not clearly embraced within it.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna