Case law

In Re Hawkins

974 So. 2d 1280 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 22, 2008

Neither respondent nor the ODC filed an objection to the disciplinary board's recommendation. DISCUSSION Bar disciplinary matters come within the original jurisdiction of this court. La. Const. art. V, § 5(B). … Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Reis, 513 So.2d 1173 (La.1987).

In Re: Ronald Seastrunk

236 So. 3d 509 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 18, 2017

Significantly, in State v. … Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v.

Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. I.P. Petroleum Co.

176 So. 3d 1047 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 11, 2015

Bolton v. Grant Parish School Bd.

730 So. 2d 882 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 5, 1999

730 So.2d 882 (1999) Sandra BOLTON v. GRANT PARISH SCHOOL BOARD. No. 98-C-1430. Supreme Court of Louisiana. March 2, 1999. Opinion on Rehearing in Part April 5, 1999. *883 Mark A. Watson, Todd A. … Joseph v. Elmwood Med. Ctr., 98-115 (La.App. 5th Cir.6/30/98), 715 So.2d 703 ; Graham v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 26-165 (La.App.2d Cir.9/23/94), 643 So.2d 352 ; see also Jacks v.

In re Fahrenholtz

215 So. 3d 204 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 7, 2017

Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Reis, 513 So.2d 1173 (La. 1987). … Louisiana State Bar Ass’n v. Whittington, 459 So.2d 520 (La. 1984).

Tucker v. Edwards

214 La. 560 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 13, 1948

No. 2 v. Edwards, 207 La. 1 , 20 So.2d 405 . … The official action of its different members is merged into the official action of the board itself as an entity. * * * ” This non-liability doctrine was considered and applied in Monnier v.

Hill v. Com'n on Ethics for Public Employees

453 So. 2d 558 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 14, 1984

HILL v. COMMISSION ON ETHICS FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. No. 83-C-2611. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 14, 1984. Rehearing Denied June 14, 1984. *559 Robert G. Pugh, Pugh & Pugh, Shreveport, for applicant. R. … Louisiana Milk Commission v. Louisiana Commission on Governmental Ethics, 298 So.2d 285, 291 (La.App. 4 Cir.1974).

State, Dept. of Health and Human Resources v. Beauchamp

477 So. 2d 1125 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 8, 1985

477 So.2d 1125 (1985) STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, OFFICE OF FAMILY SECURITY, in the Interest of Shagunda Deshawn BROWN, Minor Child of Christine Brown v. George BEAUCHAMP.

State v. Trahan

214 La. 100 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 16, 1948

City of DeRidder v. Mangano, 186 La. 129 , 171 So. 826 ; Board of Barber Examiners of La. v. Parker, 190 La. 214 , 182 So. 485 . The. -courts will .interfere only when . … State v. Legendre, 138 La. 154 , 70 So. 70 , L.R.A.1916B, 1270; City of Alexandria v. Hall, 171 La. 595 , 131 So. 722 ; State v. Chisesi, 187 La. 675 , 175 So. 453 .

Jazz Casino Company, L.L.C. v. Cynthia Bridges, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Revenue

223 So. 3d 488 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 3, 2017

The Board denied the Department’s jurisdictional challenge, and the Board’s judgment denying the Department’s motion to annul was affirmed on appeal. See Jazz Casino Co. v. … XII, § 10(B). 14 See Vogt v. Board of Com’rs of Orleans Levee Dist., 01-0089, p. 8 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/27/02), 814 So.2d 648, 654 (citing Baudoin v.

Hartigan v. Weaver

126 La. 492 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 6, 1910

The board subsequently consented, as before stated, to the transfer of this option by Estopinal to plaintiff. The land was vested in the board. … Pennoyer v. McConnaughy, 140 U. S. 1 , 11 Sup. Ct. 699, 35 L. Ed. 363 . The land commissioners, in the cited case above, had enforced a similar contract, which the parties attacked on grounds similar to those here.

City of New Orleans v. Dupuy Storage & Forwarding Corp.

215 La. 795 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 30, 1949

This suit is controlled by the doctrine announced in the cases of Board of Port Commissioners v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 161 La. 741, 745 , 109 So. 408 and Henderson v. … .) *801 The Port Commissioner’s decision was based on the doctrine announced in the case of Henderson v. City of Shreveport et al., 160 La. 360 , 107 So. 139 .

Armstrong v. Police Jury

6 La. Ann. 177 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 15, 1851

In the case of Brown v. … Brown’s case was decided under the ordinance.

August v. Blache

200 La. 1029 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 29, 1942

In the case of North v. … Dugas v. Dugas, 6 Rob. 527 ; Gastauer v. Gastauer, 143 La. 749 , 79 So. 326 ; Talbert v. Talbert, 199 La. 882 , 7 So.2d 173 .

Petition of Sewerage and Water Bd. of New Orleans

248 La. 169 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jul 2, 1965

See Tugwell v. Members of the Board of Highways, 228 La. 662 , 83 So.2d 893 (1955); State v. Board of Supervisors, 228 La. 951 , 84 So.2d 597 (1955) and Stoddard v. … Moore Planting Company v. Howell, 139 La. 336 , 71 So. 529 ; Barbara, Inc. v. Billelo, 212 La. 937 , 33 So.2d 689 and Salassi v. Salassi, 220 La. 785 , 57 So.2d 684 .

State v. Scott

243 La. 1 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 30, 1962

The facts of no case recently in this Court have quite approached the brutal beatings in Brown v. … State v. Brown, 242 La. 384 , 136 So.2d 394 ; State v. Rideau, 242 La. 431 , 137 So.2d 283 . The motion for a new trial reiterates the objections set forth in the bills of exceptions previously discussed.

Martin v. Blanchin

16 La. Ann. 237 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 15, 1861

It is contended by counsel that our decision is inconsistent with two cases decided by our predecessors, Brown v. Union Insurance Company, 3 An. 177, and Starke v. … Burke, Watt & Co., 5 An. 740; also with the case of Pratt v. McHatton, 11th An. 260, decided by the present Bench. Brown v. The Union Insurance Company and Starke v.

Jackson v. Powell

119 La. 882 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Aug 8, 1907

This was upon the authority of the cases of Guillotte v. Poincy, 41 La. Ann. 333 , 6 South. 507 , 5 L. R. A. 403, Goldman v. Gillespie, 43 La. Ann. 83 , 8 South. 880 , Wheeler v. Board of Com’rs, 46 La. … Ann. 731 , 15 South. 179 , and Sanders v.

In Re Riehlmann

891 So. 2d 1239 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 19, 2005

Nevertheless, the board reasoned that Rule 8.3(a) serves no useful purpose unless it is read to require reporting to an appropriate authority within a reasonable time under the circumstances. See United States v. … NOTES [1] Brady v.

State v. Mayor of Tallulah

556 So. 2d 39 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 5, 1990