Case law

Lamkin v. Succession of Filhiol

123 La. 181 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 1, 1909

of the United States; that said children, as was also their deceased father, are citizens of the United States and of the state of Louisiana, and as such they are entitled to all the fundamental rights, privileges, and immunities … We did not find that there was fraud in the case, but under the evidence it' was established beyond doubt that the minors had been deprived of their property without due process of law in proceedings in which they had not

Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville

149 So. 3d 210 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 3, 2014

to have liquor licenses issued to qualified permi-tees for doing business at those locations. … This statute containing the grandfather clause clearly has anjease of association with plaintiff, and, likewise, its moral, social and economic considerations clearly encompass the imposition of the risk to plaintiff under

Revere v. Revere

389 So. 2d 1277 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Oct 6, 1980

Under this standard the trial judge was clearly correct in exercising jurisdiction. Both parents lived in St. Tammany Parish for many years, were married there, and established their only matrimonial domicile there. … Even if Louisiana does not qualify as the home state, this state has at least concurrent jurisdiction.

McCann v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City

173 La. 1063 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jan 4, 1932

pledge and the foreclosure of the mortgage against the governing authority of a municipality by seizure and sale, as if proceeding against a private corporation, firm, association of persons, or individual, is therefore clearly … By the registrar of voters hereunder, shall affect the validity of the election, unless it be established that voters were thereby deprived of votes sufficient in number and amount to have changed the result of the election

SINGER HUNTER LEVINE, ETC. v. La. State Bar Ass'n

378 So. 2d 423 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 13, 1979

It is well established that the final authority to regulate the practice of law is vested in this court, not in the legislature. [4] Saucier v. … DR 2-102(D) clearly envisions and allows a situation in which a Louisiana lawyer is in partnership with other lawyers licensed in other states, but not in Louisiana.

Gary Crockett v. State of Louisiana; Jeff Landry, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Louisiana C/W Chelsey Richard Napoleon, in Her Official Capacity as Clerk of Court for Orleans Parish v. City of New Orleans; Jean Paul "j.P." Morrell in His Official Capacity as President of the New Orleans City Council; Helena Moreno in Her Capacity as the Mayor of the City of New Orleans & Calvin Johnson, in His Capacity as City Appointed Interim Clerk of Court for Orleans Pairsh

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 1, 2026

This case clearly meets that standard. Id. … Notably, by doing so, the per curiam seemingly ignores the qualifying term of “contrary.”

Hood v. Cotter

5 So. 3d 819 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 2, 2008

Thus, at the time plaintiffs suit was filed, defendant was not a qualified health care provider. … Although he was initially notified that defendant was qualified under the provisions of La.

De la Croix v. Gaines

13 La. Ann. 177 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 15, 1858

hath taken the aforesaid deeree herein, given in suit No. 8646, and hath commenced a prorceeding in chancery in the Circuit Court -of the United States, holding sessions in the Eastern Distn'ict of Louisiana, and claims immunity … It is not clearly *185 shown that the defendant was aware that the testimony was false, nor what portion of it was false, nor what witnesses were perjured, nor that the false testimony was material, and that there was not

State v. Gauthier

263 La. 678 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 6, 1972

It is submitted that the Mayor-President of East Baton Rouge Parish should qualify as an individual to whom the term ‘chief law enforcement officer’ should apply.” The contention is unimpressive. … It is hornbook law that criminal' enactments are strictly construed; consequently, since under this statute the chief executive officer of the Parish of East Baton Rouge is clearly not the chief law enforcement officer, the

Noel Estate, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern & Gulf Ry. Co.

187 La. 717 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 24, 1937

Surely, these •clauses are highly restrictive and qualify the previous general language contained in the. first paragraph of the instrument. … It is only necessary that the parties make clear their intention in the instrument to establish one. Rev.Civ.Code, arts. 709, 722.

Broussard v. Heebe's Bakery, Inc.

263 La. 561 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 6, 1972

Plaintiff’s position is that the-facts establish a vendor-vendee relationship, placing Heebe without the purview of the act, and, thus, as a third person, subject to an action in tort. … The evidence clearly discloses that Wolf loaded the baked items on special collapsible trays furnished by Heebe as an accommodation.

State v. Baum

33 La. Ann. 981 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 15, 1881

The Court properly held that this was establishing a new rule of evidence, the object of which was not expressed in the title of the act, and that the provision should, therefore, be considered as unwritten or unconstitutional … James, wherein the identical resident of East Baton Rouge can do the same act with perfect freedom and with absolute immunity from any criminal prosecution in the premises. Cooley, Const. Lim., p. 141.

State v. Martin

250 La. 705 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 1, 1967

Article 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides in essence that, whenever it shall be established to the satisfaction of the Court in which a criminal prosecution is pending that prescriptive periods (three years in … It is difficult to understand how appellant was prejudiced by the failure of the State to submit evidence to establish every, fact it alleged it intended to prove in its answer to the bill of particulars.

State v. Maise

167 So. 3d 592 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 30, 2015

After receiving a grant of transactional immunity from the State, A.L. testified that while she and Ayo were having sexual intercourse in Ward’s bedroom, R.P. and King appeared getting “ready to do something,” but she did … done the defendant, and, unless such is shown to have been the case the motion |sshall be denied, no matter upon what allegations it is grounded. 9 A defendant seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence must establish

State v. Chapman

251 La. 1089 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 25, 1968

The defense called a witness whom it did not qualify as an expert, to whom was propounded the following question: “Q. … Although we agree that they do constitute hearsay evidence, we will pretermit a discussion of *1096 their rejection by the court ex proprio motu as incompetent evidence since we find that they are clearly inadmissible as

State v. de Rancé

34 La. 186 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 15, 1882

a defense on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved, etc.” … It is true that several of the courts referred to, qualify their expressions by saying, in effect, that though it must be proved clearly and to the satisfaction of the jury, yet it need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt

In Re Perez

194 La. 763 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 4, 1940

If the power exercised by the judge should be recognized, it would insure an immunity from legal pursuit. The law, they said, never contemplated that any man, however, honorable, should be a judge in his own case. … “We ourselves have already ruled clearly in this sense on this very question. State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Judge, 33 La.Ann. 1293 ; see also (Southern Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pike) 34 La.Ann. [825] 828; (Nugent v.

State v. Williams

386 So. 2d 1342 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 15, 1980

Moreover, he had previously qualified as an expert in narcotics identification in the district courts of this state. … The verdict was clearly responsive to the charge. Assignment of Error No. 5 is without merit.

State v. Mills

229 La. 758 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 20, 1956

There is nothing in the law under which these documents were filed that carries any implication that compliance will be accompanied by an immunity from prosecution. … The documents were relevant to establish this fact. See infra.

State v. Maise

167 So. 3d 608 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 30, 2015

done the defendant, and, unless such is shown to have been the case the motion IfiBhall be denied, no matter upon what allegations it is grounded. 9 A defendant seeking a new trial based on newly discovered evidence must establish … defendants’ arrests — well before trial— and clearly did not amount to an admission she committed perjury in her testimony at a trial that had yet to take place.