Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersla

2,078 results

0.53s

  • State v. Jett

    419 So. 2d 844 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Sep 7, 1982

    The article relating to qualified pleas simply deleted the language providing for such plea. This revision was clearly designed to limit the jury discretion found so objectionable in Furman by Justice White. … He clearly poses a risk to the safety of the public.

    Cited 121 timesPublished
  • Burmaster v. Plaquemines Parish Government

    982 So. 2d 795 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 21, 2008

    If a plaintiff could avoid the prohibition (i.e., the immunity from claims under La. … To the extent that the statute establishes a burden of proof in malpractice actions, it clearly should be characterized as procedural and therefore applied to pre-existing facts and relations.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Succession of Guillory

    232 La. 213 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 25, 1957

    trustee in Louisiana under the provisions of RS 9:1871; (2) the will attempts to establish a trust for a period longer than ten years from decedent’s death and for that reason is null; (3) is further null under Louisiana … The bequest is clearly a prohibited substitution, and, as such, violative of the public policy of this state as expressed in our basic and statutory law, Section 16 of the Fourth Article of the Constitution of 1921; Article

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Simeon v. Doe

    618 So. 2d 848 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 24, 1993

    It has long been a well-established *858 rule that in sales of food for domestic use there is an implied warranty that it is wholesome and fit for human consumption. Race v. … PERSONS WITH LIVER, STOMACH, BLOOD, OR IMMUNE SYSTEM DISORDERS.

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors of La. State Univ. v. Lewark

    281 So. 2d 706 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Aug 20, 1973

    Material may not be posted on bulletin boards, walls, or doors except in accordance with the rules established for each building. … On the other hand, some groups who did not qualify were denied authority.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Eastwood v. Niblett's Bluff Park Authority

    137 So. 3d 1200 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 17, 2014

    The undisputed evidence in the record establishes the majority of the park’s funding came from local property taxes. … However, defendants' actions were clearly not grossly negligent, nor did defendants act with intent to cause injury or with indifference to the consequences of their actions. See DeLaFosse v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Sanford

    218 La. 38 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 30, 1950

    with respect thereto will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly not supported by the evidence. … 'The defendant did not himself take the stand or offer any countervailing evidence, ■or in any way establish the contrary to- be true.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Davis

    208 La. 954 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 29, 1945

    Brice claimed immunity when questioned about his duties as bookkeeper for defendant. … The identified tickets, which were clearly admissible, were links in the state’s chain of' proof.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State v. Ramsey

    292 So. 2d 708 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 25, 1974

    As amended the article provides: "Art. 817 Qualifying verdicts in capital and noncapital cases "In a capital case the jury may qualify its verdict of guilty as follows: "(1) With the addition of the words `without capital … The director of corrections shall establish procedures for awarding and recording of good time and shall determine when good time has been earned toward diminution of sentence.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bryon v. Jumel

    32 La. Ann. 442 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Mar 15, 1880

    Two propositions of fact are clearly established: 1st. … That it was promulgated before the relator qualified. These facts, we think, are-decisive of the cause, and render it legally impossible that we should grant the relief prayed for.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. DaPonte v. Board of Assessors

    35 La. Ann. 651 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 15, 1883

    clearly the exoneration rests upon the party averring. … In claiming an exemption the relator has placed himself within the exception of the rule, and assumed to prove his title to immunity.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Marilyn H. McBride, Davy A. Dowdy, and Joey E. Miller v. Old Republic Insurance Company, John K. Woodard, David G. Brooks, Sr., and Enable Midstream Partners, Lp

    Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 27, 2025

    The foregoing clearly establishes a basis for the trial court’s finding of fault on Enable’s part. Enable maintains it was unaware that White Oak employees would be using a torch to cut the piping. … So clearly that’s, you know, a matter of a few years.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Administrators of the Tulane Education Fund v. Board of Assessors

    38 La. Ann. 292 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 15, 1886

    The University is delivered to the Tulane Administrators with all its franchises immunities and property to be governed and developed by them. … burden, are questions which the Legislature must decide upon its oion judgment, and in respect to which it is vested with a large discretion which cannot be controlled by the courts, except, perhaps, where its action is clearly

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Guidry v. Frank Guidry Oil Co.

    579 So. 2d 947 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 13, 1991

    Defendants did not prove the 45 percent of fault assigned to decedent; the jury's conclusion is clearly wrong. Smith v. Travelers Ins. Co., 430 So.2d 55 (La. 1983). … On the first question, the jury should be required to allocate a percentage of fault to the employer when the evidence establishes the employer's fault.

    Overruled by Gauthier v. O'BRIEN, 618 So. 2d 825 (1993)Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Liquefied Petroleum Gas Commission v. E. R. Kiper Gas Corp.

    229 La. 640 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Feb 20, 1956

    by law to act for the body, have been appointed and qualified. … This election was held but two of the fifteen members were unable to qualify.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Reily

    242 La. 235 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 11, 1961

    the taxpayer therein, and it is well settled that a state may, within certain limits measure or compute the amount of an excise or franchise tax upon a foreign corporation with reference to assets or income which would be immune … Fontenot, decided by this Court in 1954. 7 ' That case is clearly decisive of the point..

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Ouachita Parish School Board

    242 La. 682 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · Dec 29, 1961

    This power is inherent in all government, coming into being eo instante with the establishment of the government and continuing as long as the government endures, and does not require recognition by constitutional provision … department’s petition specifically states that the project above designated provides for the construction of what is called a controlled-access facility, and the ex parte order of expropriation signed by the trial judge clearly

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Edward F. Breaux, Jr.; Linda Breaux v. Kevin Ray Worrell; City of Wilson North Carolina; Travelers Indemnity Company, Incorrectly Named as Travelers Indemnity Insurance Company; Travelers Property Casualty Company of America C/W Jessie J. Blanchard; Vickie B. Blanchard v. Travelers Indemnity Company; Kevin Ray Worrell, City of Wilson North Carolina

    Supreme Court of Louisiana · Apr 10, 2026

    Worrell does not qualify as such, there is no immunity in this case under the statute.10 9 This contractual language also excludes the possibility that Mr. … State, 635 So. 2d 188, 193 (La. 1994) (“Immunity statutes must be strictly construed against the party claiming the immunity.”).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Shreveport v. Schulsinger

    113 La. 9 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 23, 1904

    business in which the defendants are engaged, and that the ordinance is in contravention of the fourteenth *13 amendment to the Constitution of the United States, “in that it seeks to abridge and destroy the privilege and immunity … probable effect of the ordinance is that of the two witnesses who are interested in the business to which it applies; but they do not testify to facts, they merely give their opinions upon a matter .in which they are not qualified

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Byrd v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY

    637 So. 2d 114 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 23, 1994

    established in the medical literature. … Agrawal, the isolated statements do not establish, more probably than not, that Byrd had herpetic rather than ulcerative colitis in January 1987, and that the removal of his colon would not have been necessary if Dr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.