Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,145 results
2.69s
Supreme Court of Iowa · May 1, 2026
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818 (1982) (holding qualified immunity shields a government official from individual liability when his conduct does not violate “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … is not entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn the Interest of J.c, Minor Child. D.C., Father
857 N.W.2d 495 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 26, 2014
However, when paternity was clearly established in Robert, the juvenile court, upon the guardian ad li-tem’s motion and after a hearing, properly dismissed him as a necessary party. … Juvenile courts clearly have the authority to make the factual determination of whether a person qualifies as a necessary party, which inherently requires them to determine whether a person qualifies as a child’s biological
Cited 126 timesPublishedCory Burnett v. Phillip Smith and State of Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa · May 5, 2023
These include whether qualified immunity is available and what the standard should be, Baldwin I, 915 N.W.2d at 279–81; whether judicial process immunity is available, Venckus v. … Supp. 3d at 953 (“For the same reasons they must be denied federal qualified immunity on Clinton’s § 1983 claim, Officers Garrett, Steinkamp, and Minnehan must also be denied immunity under state law.”); Williams, 516
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobbins v. IOWA-ILLINOIS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
160 N.W.2d 847 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Sep 5, 1968
In determining the extent of the qualified immunity granted in the first clause of rule 141(a) the key words are “injustice or undue hardship.” Sanders v. Ayrhart, 89 Idaho 302 , 404 P.2d 589, 594 . … We are unable to determine from the interrogatory as framed whether plaintiffs seek to secure matters given absolute protection under category (2), matters given qualified immunity under category (1) or both.
Cited 6 timesPublished819 N.W.2d 383 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 15, 2012
Accordingly, Grabe is entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law for these alleged actions. 2. Whether Hester violated the clearly established constitutional rights of Minor or D.A. … Hester argues, however, that he is entitled to qualified immunity because Minor and D.A. failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he violated D.A.’s clearly established constitutional right under
Cited 41 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Iowa · May 9, 2025
Third, the plaintiff must plead “that the law was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation.” Id. … Do the people have a clearly established right, privilege, or immunity to be free from being rear-ended? T-boned? Side-swiped?
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Davenport Hotel Building Collapse
Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 7, 2025
established” law under § 670.4A(3). … We also noted in Doe a fundamental incompatibility between the federal “clearly established” standard and the nature of a common law negligence action that would somehow incorporate such a standard. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublished437 N.W.2d 553 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 22, 1989
Although that holding became binding on the department, it did not amount to a holding that the legal principle was clearly established so as to deprive the commissioner of qualified immunity. … By no stretch could it be said that Bernice’s right to a termination hearing was clearly established. It follows that the commissioner was entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJim Nahas v. Polk County, Iowa
Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 9, 2023
The “clearly established” standard is thus inherently backward-looking. … Further, whether the law was clearly established is inextricably intertwined with the new qualified immunity defense and only relevant to this case to the extent the new qualified immunity defense is operative in this
Cited 0 timesPublished915 N.W.2d 259 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 29, 2018
to believe that their actions would not violate a clearly established right of the plaintiff's under the circumstances." 284 Conn. 502 , 935 A.2d 126 , 144 (2007). … Qualified immunity would be available "if the defendant show[ed] that the state constitutional right alleged to have been violated was not clearly established." Id. at 1094 .
Cited 30 timesPublished701 N.W.2d 93 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jul 22, 2005
We quoted a Supreme Court case regarding qualified immunity and the philosophy underlying it: “[T]he qualified immunity defense ‘shield[s] [government agents] from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does … not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known....’
Cited 67 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Iowa · Nov 14, 2025
Supp. 3d at 891–94. 9 illegality of the municipal employee’s actions was not clearly established when the employee acted. Iowa Code § 670.4A(1). … As a couplet, when the substantive qualified immunity defense is inapplicable, then the heightened qualified immunity pleading standard is also inapplicable.” Id. at 805.
Cited 0 timesPublished484 N.W.2d 594 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 13, 1992
The Qualified Immunity Issue. … The defendants argue that under a qualified immunity claim only an “arguable” case of probable cause need be established.
Cited 8 timesPublished547 N.W.2d 208 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 17, 1996
agents] from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known....” … Creighton, 483 U.S. 635, 640-41 , 107 S.Ct. 3034, 3039-40 , 97 L.Ed.2d 523, 531-32 (1987) (concluding federal bureau of investigation agent is entitled to qualified immunity from money damages lawsuit if he can establish
Cited 46 timesPublishedJoshua Venckus v. City of Iowa City
930 N.W.2d 792 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 28, 2019
One well-established immunity is the judicial process immunity. … Against this regulatory backdrop, the abandonment of the absolute immunity in favor of qualified immunity is unnecessary to achieve Venckus's stated policy objectives.
Cited 43 timesPublished427 N.W.2d 158 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jul 20, 1988
Conversely, in situations in which assistant state’s attorneys’ activities are not quasi-judicial and consequently are clothed only with qualified immunity, that qualified immunity applies as well to a claim that the state … of liberty ... the alternative of qualifying a prosecutor’s immunity would disserve the broader public interest.
Cited 17 timesPublishedSupreme Court of Iowa · Jan 6, 2023
First, Iowa Code section 670.4A(1)(a) (2022) provides qualified immunity to employees or officers subject to claims arising under the IMTCA: 1. … The right, privilege, or immunity secured by law was not clearly established at the time of the alleged deprivation, or at the time of the alleged deprivation the state of the law was not sufficiently clear
Cited 0 timesPublishedHaldeman v. Total Petroleum, Inc.
376 N.W.2d 98 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 16, 1985
If the immunity provided by it were intended to be only a qualified one, we believe the legislature would have added words to so indicate. … It was error on the part of the trial court to submit the issue as a qualified privilege. It should have dismissed Haldeman’s libel claim against Total based upon statutory immunity. III. The Qualified Privilege.
Cited 32 timesPublished245 Iowa 584 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 9, 1954
Of .this nature are proceedings in legislative assemblies, and generally in judicial tribunals.” *592 The court here clearly had reference to the state legislative assembly. Also see Mayo v. … However, most of the courts have rejected such extension of absolute immunity and permitted such bodies only a conditional or qualified privilege. Bradley v. Heath, 12 Pick. (Mass.) 163, 22 Am. Dec. 418 ; Smith v.
Cited 44 timesPublishedGreene v. Friend of the Court, Polk County
406 N.W.2d 433 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 15, 1987
City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 , 100 S.Ct. 1398 , 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980), serves, we believe, to abrogate any qualified immunity under the facts which plaintiff may be able to establish at trial. … We find that DHS is clearly an alter ego agency of the state of Iowa for purposes of sharing in its immunity. See Iowa Code § 25A.2(1).
Cited 20 timesPublished
Ask Donna