Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,145 results
1.21s
Sioux City Community School District v. Iowa State Board of Public Instruction
402 N.W.2d 739 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 18, 1987
That authority is clearly granted by sections 50SA.1 and 279.12. The issue is whether there is any limitation on that authority once the decision to provide insurance has been made. … Since commencement of this appeal, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that WEAIT does not qualify as an employee welfare benefit plan under section 3(1) of ERISA.
Cited 6 timesPublished70 Iowa 97 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 28, 1886
To secure is something materially different from payment or collection, and clearly implies and gives a discretion *101 as to the sufficiency of the security to be taken, and also as to extending the time of payment in order … The plaintiff could well take the mortgage as he did, but the evidence of Baldwin tends to show there was some qualified or conditional understanding as to the possession of the merchandise which the law denominates a badge
Cited 28 timesPublishedDennis Willard v. State of Iowa
893 N.W.2d 52 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 7, 2017
The first issue we must address is whether the PSN qualifies as a morbidity and mortality study under Iowa Code section 135.40. … Under the doctrine of last preceding antecedent, a qualifying word or phrase only refers to the immediately preceding antecedent unless the language of the statute clearly demonstrates a contrary legislative intent.
Cited 14 timesPublishedState ex rel. Martinson v. Consolidated Independent School District
190 Iowa 903 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 24, 1921
Clearly, the provisions of this statute are mandatory. … In the light of the facts pleaded, we said: “We think the provisions of the statute requiring the boundaries of the proposed district to be described in the petition and published notice, and requiring one third of the qualified
Cited 10 timesPublishedChicago & North Western Railway Co. v. City of Osage
176 N.W.2d 788 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 5, 1970
They only enjoy sovereign immunity from general limitation statutes when acting in their governmental capacities. State ex rel. Schlegel v. … “In Iowa it was an almost universal practice for rural or ‘district’ schools to be established on a square acre in at least every township.
Cited 33 timesPublished55 Iowa 582 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 6, 1881
C., said: “ I have carefully examined all the authorities which were referred to in support of this argument, and they clearly establish that when the right of the plaintiff, in resj>ect of which he sues, is derived under … This ruling was clearly correct.
Cited 27 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Howson v. Consolidated School District
245 Iowa 1244 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 15, 1954
In the instant case the plaintiffs are residents of territory outside said district and are clearly adverse to claims made by said district. … be taken as verities; that defendant’s denial of plaintiffs’ petition placed the burden upon the plaintiffs to show that the members of the Board declared to be disqualified by the judgment in Case No. 12860 were in fact qualified
Cited 11 timesPublishedBenjamin Feld, Larry Feld, And Judith Feld Vs. Luke Borkowski
790 N.W.2d 72 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 22, 2010
In making this argument, the plaintiff clearly and indisputably has maintained the case should be tried as an ordinary negligence claim. … However, in a number of cases that have adopted the contact-sports exception, there have been some clearly drawn limitations on the doctrine.
Cited 73 timesPublished153 Iowa 92 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 20, 1911
It is a general rule that where a governmental duty rests upon a state or any of its instrumentalities, there is absolute immunity in respect to all acts or agencies. Beeks v. Dickinson County, supra. … Again, in the Meier case, the action was against a county poor master for his personal neglect, and it is clearly stated in the opinion that defendant was under no obligation ■ to - receive an insane patient, and could not
Cited 30 timesPublished253 N.W.2d 610 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 25, 1977
A requirement that one be personally satisfied a condition in fact exists before action is taken clearly involves discretion on the part of the decision-maker. Lloyd v. State, 251 N.W.2d 551 (Iowa 1977). … Plaintiff did not establish by substantial evidence that Jenness had refrained from driving during the period of his suspension, that he would have refrained from driving during the period of his suspension, or that he would
Cited 3 timesPublished441 N.W.2d 364 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 17, 1989
We believe this decision was sufficient to establish a reserve police force, even though the council apparently never used the word “establish.” … Chief Swain clearly possessed the requisite expertise, and was thus a “regular force peace officer” for purposes of Iowa Code section 80D.9.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJames Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Ames
661 N.W.2d 150 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 7, 2003
Clearly, the provision in the ordinance of the city that prohibits designated smoking areas conflicts with the provisions of section 142B.2, which allows such designation. … The parties agree that plaintiffs’ establishments qualify as public places. 2 . 1987 Iowa Acts ch. 219, § 2. 3 . 1990 Iowa Acts ch. 1189, § 3.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRuthven v. Beckwith & De Groat
84 Iowa 715 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 5, 1890
To hold otherwise would give to partnerships an immunity from attachments that is not accorded to natural persons. … Woodmansee, 34 Iowa, 119 , it is said, “the rule of the law is well established that, in cases of tort, it is necessary for the party complaining to show that the damages in respect to which he proceeds are the legal and
Cited 12 timesPublished86 Iowa 424 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 19, 1892
He acquired a domicile there, registered as a qualified elector, and voted at all elections, and in every way evinced his intentions to make that place his permanent abode. … He established a residence there, and became in all respects a citizen of Omaha.
Cited 2 timesPublished57 L.R.A. 244 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 13, 1902
This immunity from unlimited legislative control has befen expressly recognized by the supreme court of the United States in City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Waterworks Co., 142 U. S. 79 , (12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 142, 35 L. … Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures, 24 N. J.
Cited 72 timesPublishedIowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Mulford
625 N.W.2d 672 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 25, 2001
He established a law firm in Florida shortly after passing the bar. … Clearly, the Board had the power to bring the present charges of ethical violations against the respondent. B. Laches and estoppel.
Cited 40 timesPublished123 Iowa 118 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 16, 1904
The question, it cannot be too often repeated, is simply one of inductive, probable reasoning from certain established facts. … The error involved in directing the jury that evidence of flight gives rise to a presumption of guilt is clearly pointed out in the cases on the subject. In People v. Wong Ah Ngow, 54 Cal. 151 ( 35 Am.
Cited 23 timesPublishedGoergen v. State Tax Commission
165 N.W.2d 782 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 11, 1969
The Benedictine Sisters of Clyde, Missouri, intervenor, is a qualified religious institution. … The legislature clearly provided a limitation of the *788 exemption in section 450.4 when the bequest directed its use for the purposes enumerated.
Cited 37 timesPublishedState v. Public Employment Relations Board
744 N.W.2d 357 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 8, 2008
The ALJ stated there was no evidence in the record that would establish the willfulness of the State’s violation of section 20.9. … Dep’t of Inspections & Appeals, 671 N.W.2d 501, 509 (Iowa 2003) (holding state agency’s general regulatory authority over health care facilities did not qualify as a legislative delegation of discretion to elaborate on the
Cited 21 timesPublishedKaperonis v. Iowa State Highway Commission
251 Iowa 1166 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Aug 2, 1960
Their qualified valuation experts measured value of the lots upon a square-foot basis. … Clearly the trial court heard the testimony concerning that element of value due to location as it related to the dock, heavy industry and to the rental residential area.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna