Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersiowa

3,145 results

0.43s

  • Sears, Roebuck and Company v. Poling

    248 Iowa 582 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 5, 1957

    R. 8, page 89, states: “With but few exceptions, these clauses have not immunized the landlord from responsibilitjr for his acts of affirmative negligence.” … fire must be an unavoidable casualty the court stated: “If it had been intended that the fire must also be an unavoidable casualty, it would seem that there was no occasion for mentioning fire at all or that, if mentioned, qualifying

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Ness v. Independent School District

    230 Iowa 771 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 17, 1941

    W. 29, 31 , “The rule long established in this state is that a municipality, in the exercise of its purely governmental function, is not liable for negligence.” … In affirming a judgment for damages, the opinion states: “For the exercise of purely governmental functions a municipal corporation is not liable. * * * The creation and maintenance of a nuisance is very clearly not a governmental

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Boardman v. Davis

    231 Iowa 1227 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 12, 1942

    conditions require; and their conclusions should not be disturbed by the courts unless clearly arbitrary and unreasonable.” … The building permit afforded defendants no protection, because *1232 the location of the building clearly violated the zoning ordinance.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Musser

    721 N.W.2d 734 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Aug 4, 2006

    The test results at issue here are clearly nontestimonial. See People v. … In order to establish a due process violation based upon prosecutorial misconduct, the defendant must first establish proof of misconduct. Id. at 869 .

    Cited 100 timesPublished
  • Lambert v. Rice

    143 Iowa 70 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 10, 1909

    It in no sense qualifies the former *75 action of the court, but causes such former action of the court to appear correctly upon the record, according to the very truth, as it was at that time. … The record, as so corrected, establishes the unmistakable title of plaintiff McBride to .the property in question, and he is entitled to a decree so finding.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Mosher v. Department of Inspections & Appeals, Health Facilities Division

    671 N.W.2d 501 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 13, 2003

    Clearly, DIA’s general regulatory authority over health care facilities under chapter 135C does not qualify as a legislative delegation of discretion to DIA with respect to the particular matter of dependent adult abuse under … Section 235B.2(5)(a )(l)(c) requires that a person qualify as a caretaker at the time of each specific act of abuse.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Dubuque Comm. Sch. D. v. Pub. Emp. Rel.

    424 N.W.2d 427 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 11, 1988

    Given a substitute who has qualified for bargaining unit inclusion under the four consecutive month test of section 20.4(5), and given the district's offer of employment the following school year, we think there is clearly … But a substitute who qualifies in one school year will be presumed to qualify at the commencement of the succeeding year for purpose of contract negotiation, and will thereafter qualify so long as service in four consecutive

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Town of McGregor v. Baylies

    19 Iowa 43 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 16, 1865

    It may be foun¿ jn gession Laws of 1862, page 41, et seq., and is entitled “An act to establish a court at McGregor,” and has eleven sections. … He must be a qualified elector of *45 the town and commissioned by the governor.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Wheeler v. Long

    128 Iowa 643 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Oct 21, 1905

    Said Long appears to have been duly qualified as executor, and to have been also appointed guardian of the child. … That the clearly expressed purpose of the testator to create an estate of this kind will be respected and enforced is well established. Wilhelm v. Calder, 102 Iowa, 342 , 30 Am. & Eng. Enc.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State v. Boyken

    217 N.W.2d 218 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Apr 24, 1974

    defendant’s conviction was affirmed only because other instructions clearly directed the jury to consider only lack of evidence on the part of the State. … Where the owner is a private corporation, a managing officer may testify if, as here, it is further shown he has knowledge of such value as qualifies him in fact.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • McCoy v. Quigly

    55 Iowa 315 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 16, 1880

    The burden to establish these specifications is on the defendant. … There was evidence tending to show a portion of the material *318 put into the house was rotten and of inferior qualify.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Andrews v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n

    226 Iowa 374 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Feb 15, 1939

    We are clearly of the opinion that the true legal relation of master and servant existed between the de: fendant and the drivers in its employ at the time of the alleged injury, and that, just as such a servant has a lawful … W. 251 , the Hermann estate, by the will of the testator, was entrusted to Ewing et al., to be devoted to the establishment and maintenance of a charitable hospital.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Best

    2 Iowa 96 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Dec 15, 1855

    The information does clearly state, that Best is unlawfully holding and exercising the office of county judge for the county of Lucas. … The August election is established by law, and the time it is held should be judicially taken notice of.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Iowa v. Amy Lois Rasmussen

    Supreme Court of Iowa · May 24, 2024

    Nevertheless, that is not the case here, as the record clearly refutes the defendant’s claims. … This court concluded that the statute “clearly informs the court and the defendant under what circumstances the court will extend a no-contact or- der.” Id. at 542.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Iowa v. Amy Lois Rasmussen

    Supreme Court of Iowa · May 24, 2024

    Nevertheless, that is not the case here, as the record clearly refutes the defendant’s claims. … This court concluded that the statute “clearly informs the court and the defendant under what circumstances the court will extend a no-contact or- der.” Id. at 542.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Cadle

    2 Greene 400 · Supreme Court of Iowa · May 15, 1850

    By that instrument it is expressly established that the clerks and prosecuting attorneys shall be elected at the general election, and hold their offices during the term of t-wo years, and the time designated for this general … The first legislature under tbe constitution clearly recognized that construction, in passing an act defining tbe time of bolding elections for state, district and county officers. Laws of 1847, p.~ 153.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Larry C. Beverage, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles E. Beverage, and Linda K. Anderson, and Bonnie K. Valentine v. ALCOA, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Iowa-Illinois Taylor Insulation, Inc., successor-in-interest to Iowa Illinois Thermal Insulation, Inc., an Iowa Corporation

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Jun 17, 2022

    “The prima facie showing shall be made as to each defendant and include a detailed narrative medical report and diagnosis signed under oath by a qualified physician.” Id. … These subsections limit use of the medical impairment evidence required to establish a prima facie claim to pretrial proceedings, id. § 686B.7(1)–(2); preclude discovery until a prima facie case is established, id.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LS Power Midcontinent, LLC v. State

    Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 24, 2023

    LSP is a Qualified Transmission Developer in MISO. As such, it is qualified to complete transmission projects in Iowa. … III, § 29; (2) the title clause, id.; and (3) the privileges and immunities (equal protection) clause, id. art. I, § 6.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fanning v. Mapco, Inc.

    181 N.W.2d 190 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Nov 10, 1970

    It is well established under our law that a condemnor may do so. … It is plaintiffs’ duty to show their witness is qualified, not defendant’s to show he isn’t.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Fuller v. Iowa Department of Human Services

    576 N.W.2d 324 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Mar 25, 1998

    The rule seems well-established from decided cases, however, that depression and other psychological disorders qualify as a “mental impairment” under the ADA. See Sarko v. … The analysis we established in Boelman is similar to the analytical framework in Cole , in that both require a plaintiff to prove he or she was (1) disabled; (2) qualified; and (3) suffered adverse employment decision because

    Cited 42 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.