Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilsd

1,362 results

1.24s

  • Clanton v. United States

    241 F. Supp. 3d 857 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 14, 2017

    Yablonsky established that if Nurse Jordan had consulted with Dr. Albarcha or referred Mr. … Dalai clearly was not concerned by Mr. Clanton’s decision to shorten his treatments on fifteen occasions, because Dr. Dalai considered Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kennedy v. Santos

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 26, 2025

    Santos continued Plaintiff’s established treatment plan. Id. Plaintiff saw non-defendant Dr. … Like his hernia, Plaintiff clearly disagreed with Dr. Santos’s treatment plan for his chest pain.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Norris v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 28, 2021

    APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS To qualify for DIB, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statutes. … This is a well-established rule. See Stewart v. Astrue, 561 F.3d Page 10 of 16 679, 684 (7th Cir. 2009)(collecting cases).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Baker v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 9, 2019

    Beyond that, it was clearly not the case that plaintiff took no psychotropic medication after July 2015. The ALJ had before him Dr. … This is a well-established rule. See, Stewart v. Astrue, 561 F.3d 679, 684 (7th Cir. 2009) (collecting cases).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 19, 2020

    Applicable Legal Standards To qualify for DIB or SSI, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statutes.3 Under the Social Security Act, a person is disabled if he … This is a well-established rule. See, Stewart v. Astrue, 561 F.3d 679, 684 (7th Cir. 2009) (collecting cases).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ross v. Gossett

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Mar 26, 2020

    Rule 23(a) Requirements Numerosity For numerosity, Plaintiffs must establish that a sufficient number of class members exist … Clearly, a class of this size is sufficiently numerous to render joinder impracticable; thereby satisfying Rule 23(a)(1).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Littlefield v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 26, 2022

    APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS To qualify for DIB, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statutes. … Clearly, Plaintiff’s complaints were present and mentioned throughout most if not all of her visits with Dr. Baak.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sudholt v. Country Mutual Insurance Company

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 26, 2023

    damage caused by defendants’ alleged conduct occurred in the state where the suit was brought,” such that conduct allegedly injuring consumers throughout the country or broadly throughout the several states would not qualify … Further, the individual Defendants and their decision-making was clearly integral to “fulfill[ing] Country Mutual’s fundamental purpose of providing insurance at cost,” even if they allegedly usurped profits in order

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Headrick v. Does

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Feb 9, 2021

    The Court in Miller clearly illustrates this distinction. … Instead, the Seventh Circuit held that neither type of ignorance nor misunderstanding qualified as a mistake under Rule 15(c). Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Deibert v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 16, 2024

    Applicable Legal Standards To qualify for DIB, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statute.3 Under the Social Security Act, a person is disabled if she has an … While not clearly articulated in his brief, it appears that Plaintiff makes a two-fold challenge to the ALJ’s determination.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hartman v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 17, 2024

    Amazon filed a motion to dismiss with seven attachments, which, it claimed, qualified for review under the incorporation-by-reference doctrine. Id. at *2. … Moreover, “if a term has a settled legal meaning, the courts will normally infer that the legislature intended to incorporate that established meaning into the law.” Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Deibert v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 17, 2024

    Applicable Legal Standards To qualify for DIB, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statute.3 Under the Social Security Act, a person is disabled if she has an … While not clearly articulated in his brief, it appears that Plaintiff makes a two-fold challenge to the ALJ’s determination.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Allen v. Jeffreys

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jan 26, 2024

    However, the December 1, 2021, notes are clearly signed by M. Moldenhauer. (Doc. 1-1 at 52). … Raemisch, 555 F.3d 592, 593-94 (7th Cir. 2009) (“Section 1983 does not establish a system of vicarious responsibility.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Whittenburg v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 26, 2024

    “A claimant need not be disabled at the date of his hearing; rather, he qualifies for benefits if a disability existed for any consecutive twelve- month period during the relevant time frame.” … As to Plaintiff’s arguments that the most recent medical opinion was from 2019, the Commissioner emphasizes that Plaintiff carries the burden to establish her disability.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smart

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Dec 3, 2025

    APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARDS To qualify for SSI, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statutes and regulations. … Cohn’s notes from February 27, 2024, 10 The Court discusses this example because it was argued at length by the parties and represents a medical development and diagnosis that is clearly significant and ambiguous.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Howe v. Godinez

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Sep 6, 2021

    Cauley is qualified as an expert based on knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education. The Court further finds Dr. Cauley’s testimony to be credible and persuasive. … The Constitution clearly dictates that a civil detainee cannot simply be warehoused and put out of sight; they are not prisoners and must be afforded adequate treatment.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stephens v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jun 2, 2025

    To qualify for SSI based on disability, a claimant must be “disabled” as defined by Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381, et seq. … See Weatherbee, 649 F.3d at 572 (“[I]n the context of step five of [the] disability benefits analysis, ‘it appears well-established that 1,000 jobs’ constitutes a significant number.”) (quoting Liskowitz v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rogers v. Hacker

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · Aug 28, 2023

    -1, pg. 9-10, 18; 101-2, pg. 2; 101-3, pg. 2).4 During that time, Plaintiff was barred from “acquir[ing] or possess[ing] any firearm [or ammunition], stun gun, or taser within this State,” even though he was otherwise qualified … Clearly, Plaintiff has not suffered a concrete injury from the conduct alleged in Count IV. See TransUnion LLC, 141 S. Ct. at 2203; Fox, 980 F.3d at 1151.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 7, 2021

    Applicable Legal Standards To qualify for DIB, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the applicable statutes4. … Indeed, the evidence clearly establishes there were no acceptable pulmonary test results while Plaintiff was medically stable during the relevant time that showed he met Listing 3.02.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Westefer v. Snyder

    725 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · Jul 20, 2010

    Also, in previous orders in this case the Court has held that the doctrine of qualified immunity shields Defendants from liability in damages to the named Plaintiffs in this case as individuals for the due process violations … Since these highly restrictive environments, if misused, can create conditions tantamount to long-term isolation, the Department of Corrections will have to establish clearly defined rules and regulations to govern the admission

    Reversed on other grounds by Robert Westefer v. Michael Neal, 682 F.3d 679 (2012)Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.