Case law

Lara v. College Police Department

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 6, 2023

Leaving the Rock Valley College Board of Trustees, in its official capacity, as the only defendant. … V) would be the norm.

Sieber v. Wigdahl

704 F. Supp. 1519 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 17, 1989

Board of Education of Collinsville, 82 Ill.2d 415, 429 , 45 Ill.Dec. 96, 106 , 412 N.E.2d 447, 457 (1980). See also Keller v. Mols, Bernesak v. … The letter states in part: At the last Board of Governors meeting in May, your name was brought up, and it was agreed that you should receive such a warning.

ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. United States

356 F. Supp. 1267 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 15, 1972

In Sachs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Slaymaker Lock Co. v. … In Wasatch Chemical Co. v.

Jefferson v. Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc.

161 F.R.D. 63 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 13, 1995

(“TILA”), 1 and implementing Federal Reserve Board Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. part 226. 2 Plaintiff, Carolyn Jefferson, seeks certification of a class pursuant to Rule 23. … See generally Highsmith v.

Flag Co. v. Maynard

376 F. Supp. 2d 849 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 8, 2005

Textor v. … Board of Regents of Northern Illinois University, 711 F.2d 1387, 1392 (7th Cir.1983). 8 To satisfy the requirements of due process, *855 the plaintiff “must allege both an actionable conspiracy and a substantial act in furtherance

Bank of America, N.A. v. Moglia (In Re Outboard Marine Corp.)

278 B.R. 778 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 10, 2002

See, e.g., Shaffer v. Liberty Life Assur. … See, e.g., Lomas Mortgage U.S.A., Inc. v. W.E. O’Neil Constr.

Figueroa v. Village of Melrose Park

127 F. Supp. 3d 905 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 31, 2015

For example, in Buntin v. … Finally, the plaintiff in Garcia v.

Smith v. Apex Towing Co.

949 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 8, 1997

Whether plaintiff initially injured her back on board the DEWEY R or only aggravated an existing injury is irrelevant to the inquiry of whether defendant is liable to pay maintenance and cure. … Deisler, 54 F.3d at 1081 ; Sammon v.

SKF USA, INC. v. Bjerkness

636 F. Supp. 2d 696 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 24, 2009

See Nexans Wires S.A. v. … See, e.g., Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Mudron, 379 Ill.App.3d 724, 728 , 320 Ill.Dec. 293 , 887 N.E.2d 437, 440 (3d Dist.2008) (citing Abel v.

Bannon Ex Rel. United States v. Edgewater Medical Center

406 F. Supp. 2d 907 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 28, 2005

Indeed, the board allegedly was made aware of the fraudulent activity occurring at the Hospital through “a publication which raised questions of fraud at Edgewater Hospital,” and the board even discussed the publication at … Gross v.

Hull

District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 22, 2026

Pa. 2019) (43 days was prompt); Brown v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., 2025 WL 455373, at *6 (S.D. Ill. 2025) (28 days was prompt); with Doherty v. Goslin, 2002 WL 32224695, at *1–2 (E.D. … Id. at *3 (emphasis in original) (collecting cases); see also Browning v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 396 F. App’x. 496, 505 (10th Cir. 2010); Anthony v.

Specht v. Google, Inc.

805 F. Supp. 2d 551 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 27, 2011

Its analysis in Bittner v. … With Fleming on board, this case became more contentious. For example, Fleming should have been more forthcoming in responding to Google’s interrogatories and document requests.

Barr v. Hardiman

583 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 15, 1982

In Thedford v. … In Little v.

Wilson v. National Credit Union

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 26, 2025

Henson v. … [a] decision” by the NCUA Board.6 Fed. MTD 2 ¶ 3.

Ocampo v. Harris

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 30, 2023

See Greenawalt v. In- diana Dep’t of Corr., 397 F.3d 587, 589 (7th Cir. 2005) (“[T]he defense of official im- munity is applicable … to liability for damages.); see also Brown v. … Forgue v.

Grotemeyer v. Lake Shore Petro Corp.

749 F. Supp. 883 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 12, 1990

See Amadeo v. … v.

Smith v. Farmstand

909 F. Supp. 2d 1001 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 15, 2012

See Rush v. … Block, 940 F.2d 1211 (9th Cir.1991) (holding that retaliation claim was “reasonably related” to prior sex discrimination claim); Brown v. Hartshorne Public Sch. Dist.

Tankersley v. Albright

374 F. Supp. 530 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 11, 1973

alia, that (1) the Trustees of the McCormick-Patterson Trust had caused themselves and their spouses to be elected directors of the Tribune Company and its subsidiaries and thus had gained absolute voting control of the board … Co. v.

Midwest Marketing Co. v. Quality Produce Suppliers, Inc.

6 F. Supp. 3d 843 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 19, 2013

Smith v. City of Chicago, 242 F.3d 737 , 742 (7th Cir.2001). … See, e.g., Harris N.A. v. Bacchus Fresh Intern, Inc., 2013 WL 1200609 (N.D.Ill. Mar. 25, 2013); Sato & Co., LLC v. S & M Produce, Inc., 859 F.Supp.2d 923, 930-31 (N.D.Ill.2012); Anthony Marano Co. v.

Walsh v. Wolf

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 1, 2022

Orthodox Church Outside Russ. v. 4 A “petition for review” is “a challenge to an order of removal entered by the [Board of Immigration Appeals].” Singh v. USCISC, 878 F.3d 441, 445 (2d Cir. 2017); cf. Hassan v. … Lee v. USCIS, 592 F.3d 612, 620 (4th Cir. 2010); see Abdelwahab v.