Case law

Brown v. Worldpac, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 1, 2018

Counts IV and V are pled on behalf of Brown, Johnson, and the proposed class. … Hempel & Co., Inc. v.

United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

126 F. Supp. 27 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 16, 1954

Sloan at the time of this writing was Chairman of the Board and Brown was a member of the General Motors Board, a director of the du Pont Company, a member of the Financial Policy Committee of General Motors, and also a member … MacDonnell v. Capital Co., 9 Cir., 1942, 130 F.2d 311 , certiorari denied 317 U.S. 692 , 63 S.Ct. 324 , 87 L.Ed. 554 .

Whittaker Corp. v. Edgar

535 F. Supp. 933 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 25, 1982

Arthur Rollin (“Rollin’’) a partner of Mayer, Brown & Platt who specializes in tax law, reaffirmed Herzel’s tax advice to the Brunswick board in a telephone call with the board on February 13, 1982. 35. … United States v. Alcoa, 377 U.S. 271, 273-77 , 84 S.Ct. 1283, 1285-1288 , 12 L.Ed.2d 314 (1964); Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

United States v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 4, 2018

His 2005 criminal conviction, U.S. v. Brown, No. 05 CR 73 (N.D. Ill.), is cited as (Case No. 05 CR 73, Dkt.). … United States v.

Thompson v. American Airlines Group, Inc.

128 F. Supp. 3d 1047 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 2, 2015

Brown v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 254 F.3d 654, 658 (7th Cir.2001) (citing Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Norris, 512 U.S. 246, 252 , 114 S.Ct. 2239 , 129 L.Ed.2d 203 (1994)). … Minor disputes must be adjudicated through the employer’s internal procedures or by the union’s adjustment board. 45 U.S.C. § 184 ; Brown, 254 F.3d at 658 (quoting Monroe v. Missouri Pacific R.R.

John M. v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CHICAGO, DIST. 299

612 F. Supp. 2d 981 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 4, 2009

Farrar v. … V.

Smith v. BOARD OF ELECTION COM'RS FOR CITY OF CHICAGO

586 F. Supp. 309 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 19, 1984

Eddings and John Davis, Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS FOR the CITY OF CHICAGO and Michael E. Lavelle, James R. Nolan and Corneal A. … Margalus and Dominic Costanzo, Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF ELECTION COMMISSIONERS FOR the CITY OF CHICAGO and Michael E. Lavelle, James R. Nolan and Corneal A.

United States ex rel. Arnold v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board

803 F. Supp. 222 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 5, 1992

Scott v. … Johnson v.

United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago

610 F. Supp. 702 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 4, 1985

United States v. Board of Education, No. 80 C 5124, slip op. at 2 n. 1 (N.D.Ill. April 15, 1985) (unpublished memorandum order). … The emphasis of the Secretary on Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696 , 94 S.Ct. 2006 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974), is largely beside the point.

Citizens for John W. Moore Party v. Board of Election Commissioners

599 F. Supp. 662 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 28, 1984

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 737, n. 8 , 94 S.Ct. 1274, 1283, n. 8 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974); Rosario v. Rockefeller, 410 U.S. 752, 756, n. 5 , 93 S.Ct. 1245, 1249, n. 5 , 36 L.Ed.2d 1 (1973). … Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). The plaintiffs’ First Amendment associational rights were not unduly burdened. The statute did not prevent Moore’s candidacy.

Nanda v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

219 F. Supp. 2d 911 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 21, 2001

Plaintiff Navreet Nanda has brought this action against the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois and University officials. … [state university] Board of Trustees as barred by the eleventh amendment.”); Johnson v.

Barker ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. A.D. Conner Inc.

807 F. Supp. 2d 707 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 11, 2011

It may be many months before the Board reaches the merits of the Director’s case. See, e.g. Electro-Voice, 83 F.3d at 1573 ; Barker v. … Co. v.

John M. v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF EVANSTON TP. HIGH

450 F. Supp. 2d 880 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 18, 2006

No. 25 v. George L., 102 F.3d 895 , 901 (7th Cir.1996)). … Beth R. v. Forrestville Valley Community Unit Sch. Dist. #221, 375 F.3d 603, 613 (7th Cir.2004).

Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority

342 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 10, 1972

Crow v. Brown, supra, 332 F.Supp. at 392 . C. … County Board, 308 F.Supp. 352 (E.D.Ark.1970); Crow v. Brown, supra; Kennedy Park Homes Ass’n v.

Bobkoski v. Board of Education of Cary Consolidated School District 26

141 F.R.D. 88 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 30, 1992

See Memorial Hospital v. … Credit Union v. Cantor, Fitzgerald Sec., 91 F.R.D. 414, 418 (N.D.Ga. 1981) (discussions by internal accountant and lower-level managers to employer-client’s attorney at board meeting protected under Upjohn).

Safari Circuits, Inc. v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees

474 F. Supp. 2d 993 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 21, 2007

This opinion will cite Safari’s and Board's respective LR 56.1 statements as "S. St. ¶ — " and "B. St. ¶ — ,” and their responsive statements as “S. Resp. St. V —” and "B. Resp. St. ¶ —." 3 . … Henry DeCicco & Co. v. Drucker, 101 Ill. App.2d 340, 346-47, 243 N.E.2d 456, 459-60 (1st Dist.1968) and Lyons Sav. v.

Martens Ex Rel. Martens v. District No. 220, Board of Education

620 F. Supp. 29 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 19, 1985

At the conclusion of the hearing the Board decided to expel Martens for the remainder of the school year. … See Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969) (First Amendment), Ingraham v.

Microthin. Com, Inc. v. Siliconezone USA, LLC

615 F. Supp. 2d 754 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 6, 2009

SiliconeZone sells housewares for kitchens, including the “KITCHENZONE” Cutting Boards. (PL 56.1 Resp. ¶ 3.) … “KITCHENZONE” Cutting Boards are sold in sets of four cutting boards, with each board bearing a symbol to represent different categories of food, such as meat, seafood or produce. (Id.)

Tonya K. Ex Rel. Diane K. v. Chicago Board of Education

551 F. Supp. 1107 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 8, 1982

See, e.g., Arkansas Education Association v. Board of Education, 446 F.2d 763, 765-66 (8th Cir.1971) (certification of a class of 20 black teachers alleging discrimination affirmed); Cypress v. … See, e.g., Jose P. v. Ambach, supra; Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, 348 F.Supp. 866, 868 (D.D.C.1972); Green v. Johnson, supra.

Marshall v. Fairman

951 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 2, 1997

Marshall asked that witnesses be called, but states that he “was denied by the board.” Marshall was found guilty and given twenty days in segregation. He has sued Dooley, Brown, Galtney, Drahos and J.W. … It is unclear whether Drahos played a part in the administrative hearing that resulted in Marshall’s being confined in disciplinary segregation; did “the board” include Drahos?