Case law

Brown v. Knapp

156 F. Supp. 2d 732 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2001

Hossman v. Blunk, 784 F.2d 793, 796-97 (7th Cir.1986); Strauss v. City of Chicago, 760 F.2d 765, 767-69 (7th Cir.1985). … In Powe v.

Brown v. Chater

913 F. Supp. 1210 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 29, 1996

Pope v. Shalala, 998 F.2d 473, 477 (7th Cir.1993). … Brown requests that on remand I should order that the Commissioner consider this report. I agree that it should be considered. 10 . Smith v.

Lester v. Brown

929 F. Supp. 291 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 28, 1996

A more detailed description of the events that occurred that evening is contained in our prior opinion granting summary judgment to the defendants, Lester v. Brown, 889 F.Supp. 1039, 1041-42 (N.D.Ill.1995). 2 . … Bachenski v. Malnati, 11 F.3d 1371, 1377-79 (7th Cir.1993) (applying Towns v.

Gergans v. Brown

911 F. Supp. 308 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 26, 1995

Inman v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 840, 843 (7th Cir.1994) (citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Pennington v. Didrickson, 22 F.3d 1376, 1383 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 613 , 130 L.Ed.2d 522 (1994); but see Wagner Seed Co. v.

Smith v. Brown

978 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 26, 1997

The plaintiff, Marsha Smith, brought suit against the defendant, Jesse Brown, the Secretary of her employer, the Department of Veterans Affairs, alleging violations of Title VII. … Galloway v. General Motors Serv. Parts Operations, 78 F.3d 1164, 1167-68 (7th Cir.1996); Doe v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co., 42 F.3d 439, 443 (7th Cir.1994).

Ali v. Brown

998 F. Supp. 917 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 23, 1998

The Board saw no merit in Mi’s argument that the VA improperly removed her while she was ill. … See Reidt v.

Brown v. Runyon

2 F. Supp. 2d 1062 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 24, 1998

Rush v. McDonald’s Corp., 966 F.2d 1104, 1109 (7th Cir.1992); see also Waldridge v. … Brown received only four reprimands (all for inadequate attendance). This is not a case like Oates v.

Lonchyna v. Brown

491 F. Supp. 1352 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 3, 1980

United States v. Fallon, 407 F.2d 621, 623 (7th Cir. 1969); United States v. Holmes, 387 F.2d 781, 784 (7th Cir. 1968); see Hall v. United States, 437 F.2d 1063 (7th Cir. 1971). … Diliberti v. Brown, 583 F.2d 950, 952 (7th Cir. 1978) (“Assuming that the exhaustion requirement would be relaxed in the case of a ‘clear’ constitutional violation, plaintiff’s claim is less than clear.”)

Lumpkin v. Brown

960 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 22, 1997

Brown, 20 F.3d 745, 747 (7th Cir.1994)). … Instead "[t]he ultimate issue at trial is whether 'age was a determining factor' in the employer's decision” (EEOC v. Century Broadcasting Corp., 957 F.2d 1446 , 1450 (7th Cir.1992), quoting Brown v.

Brown v. Baer

54 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 16, 1943

Brown, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, v. Julius Baer et al., an application has been filed to compel the respondents to attend, testify, and produce documentary evidence. … Securities and Exchange Commission, 299 U.S. 504 , 57 S.Ct. 18 , 81 L.Ed. 374 ; Woolley v. United States, 9 Cir., 97 F.2d 258, 259 ; Consolidated Mines of California et al. v.

Rondon v. Allstate Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 27, 2025

See Combs v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., 551 F.3d 991, 999 (10th Cir. 2008) (holding that an insurance agency agreement is “based upon each party’s attempt to obtain a 2 See, e.g., Brown v. Elephant Talk Communs. … Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74, 78 (Okla. 1986) (quoting Restatement of Torts (Second) § 652D, comment (a)). The communication must “reach[], or [be] sure to reach the public.” Id.

Brown v. Smith

56 F. Supp. 3d 910 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 2014

See, e.g., Cooney v. … For similar reasons, Smith’s argument that the Seventh Circuit “has consistently applied absolute immunity to parole board members” is not persuasive. See Def.’s Br. at 8. In Wilson v.

Black v. Brown

355 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 13, 1973

A written statement of the decision of a majority of the board, the basis for the decision, and the disciplinary action, if any, to be imposed is given to the inmate. … Sostre v. McGinnis, supra, Bundy v. Cannon, 328 F.Supp. 165 (D.Md., 1971); Landman v. Royster, 333 F.Supp. 621 (E.D.Va. 1971).

United States v. Brown

349 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 11, 1972

Bouschor v. United States, 316 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1963). Further, the document was not requested by Marshall Bratter but *427 was requested by Mr. Brown for inclusion in the files of Andersen. … However, in Colton v.

Haag v. Board of Education

655 F. Supp. 1267 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 17, 1987

See, e.g., Sere v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 628 F.Supp. 1543 (N.D.Ill. 1986). … The defendant relies on Lyman v. Board of Education, 605 F.Supp. 193 , (N.D.Ill. 1985), which dismissed a section 1983 action against board of education. The court in Lyman relied on Monell v.

Brown v. United States

552 F. Supp. 662 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 30, 1982

In opposing the summary judgment motion, Brown is entitled to all reasonable inferences in his favor from the facts of record, United States v. … Brady Co. v. Lem Products, Inc., 521 F.Supp. 676, 678 (N.D.Ill.1981).

Rangel v. Brown

445 F. Supp. 2d 936 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 26, 2006

See Thompson v. Illinois Dep’t of Prof'l Regulation, 300 F.3d 750 , 753 (7th Cir.2002); Gomez v. Illinois State Bd. of Educ., 811 F.2d 1030, 1039 (7th Cir.1987); First Ins. Funding Corp. v. Fed. Ins. … Hicks v.

Brown v. United States

298 F. 177 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 1, 1920

S. v. One Sorrel Horse, Fed. Cas. No. 15,953, 27 Fed. Cas. 315 ; Jewell v. Board of Trustees, 113 Iowa, 47 , 84 N. W. 973, 975 . … First Trust & Savings Bank v. Smietanka (C. C. A.) 268 Fed. 230 . The demurrer is overruled.

United States v. Brown

17 F.R.D. 286 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 24, 1955

Brown, the defendant, for the years 1947 and 1948.” … Gordon v. United States, 344 U.S. 414 , 73 S.Ct. 369 , 97 L.Ed. 447 . The principal case cited by counsel for the defendant can easily be distinguished from the case at bar. In Fryer v.

United States v. Brown

338 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 4, 1972

Dickinson v. … Minn.1970); Slettlehough v. Tarr, 4 SSLR 3106 (D.Minn.1971). There is a critical distinction between the type of case handled by a local board and that handled by an appeal board.