Case law

American Agriculture Movement, Inc. v. Board of Trade

770 F. Supp. 407 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 10, 1991

The American Agriculture Movement v. Board of Trade, 1990 WL 71025 , 1990 U.S. Dist. Lexis 4970 (1990). … Id. at 358, n. 12 , 83 S.Ct. at 1257, n. 12 . 5 In Gordon v.

Thompson v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 3, 2021

) 20 C 133 ) MARY BROWN and TRINA TAYLOR, ) Judge Charles P. … Carlson v. CSX Transp., Inc., 758 F.3d 819, 828 (7th Cir. 2014); see also Kidwell v.

Textor v. Board of Regents of Northern Illinois University

87 F.R.D. 751 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 2, 1980

Board Of Regents Of Northern Illinois University, et al., 80 C 378 (the “Brue case”). … World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v.

People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education

179 F.R.D. 551 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 7, 1998

In Board of Education v. … In Raines v.

Brown v. Pfister

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 30, 2021

On August 28, 2015, Brown sent a copy of his emergency grievance to the Administrative Review Board. Id. … See, e.g., Kaba v. Stepp, 458 F.3d 678, 684 (7th Cir. 2006) (citing Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93 (2006)).

Stone v. Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois University

38 F. Supp. 3d 935 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 5, 2014

Defendants Hart, Cliffe, and Cunningham are dismissed from the suit., *941 STATEMENT Plaintiff, Ruth Stone, has sued her current employer, the Board of Trustees of Northern Illinois University (“NIU”), and several of NIU’ … See Kannaby v. U.S.

Kastel v. Winnetka Board of Education, District 36

975 F. Supp. 1072 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 28, 1997

On June 21, 1995, Rastel wrote to the school board, requesting that the board reconsider its decision not to re-hire 5 + 5 retirees, at least as to her case, and asking for a meeting with the board. … Wolf v. Buss, 77 F.3d 914, 918 (7th Cir.1996); Taylor v. Canteen Corp., 69 F.3d 773, 779 (7th Cir.1995).

United States v. Board of Education

642 F. Supp. 206 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 1986

We sympathize with the Board’s lament that the Secretary’s dual argument places the Board on the horns of a dilemma. … The United States seems ever-ready to attack a Board proposal rather than eager to work with the Board in designing a reasonable proposal; it presumes inadequacy, taking the attitude, "What’s wrong with the Board’s proposal

Brown & Kerr Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.

940 F. Supp. 1245 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 12, 1996

See Brown & Kerr, Inc. v. St Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., No. 95 C 1119, 1996 WL 464212 , at *2 (N.D.Ill. Aug. 12, 1996). … Conte, Inc. v.

Brown v. Pfister

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 2, 2020

Cannon v. Thomas, 419 U.S. 813 (1974); see also Adams v. Durai, 153 F. … See Arnett v.

Brown v. Saul

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 22, 2020

See Carradine v. … Brown v. Barnhart, 298 F. Supp. 2d 773, 797 (E.D. Wis. 2004) (citation omitted). An ALJ, moreover, may not “play doctor” or reach his own independent medical conclusion without support from the medical evidence.

Thompson v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 20, 2020

Alam v. Miller Brewing Co., 709 F.3d 662, 665–66 (7th Cir. 2013). All reasonable inferences are drawn in Thomas’s favor. League of Women Voters of Chicago v. … Co. v. Pension Plan & Trust, 223 F.3d 445, 453 (7th Cir. 2000).

Cathedral Trading, LLC v. Chicago Board Options Exchange

199 F. Supp. 2d 851 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 30, 2002

Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 998 F.2d 391 , 395 & n. 7 (7th Cir.1993). The inquiry is fact intensive and “no single factor is conclusive.” Sanner v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 62 F.3d 918, 927 (7th Cir.1995). … Bowl-O-Mat, 429 U.S. at 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690 (citing Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)).

Brown v. Local 701 of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

996 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 13, 1998

Brown alleges that the union engaged in unfair hiring hall practices. As to the CBA, that claim constitutes a breach of the union’s duty of fair representation. Daniels v. … Brown’s argument that we should apply instead the two-year state limitations period for personal injury actions to Counts I and II, as was done in Stevens v. Northwest Indiana Dist.

Cook County Republican Party v. Board of Election Commissioners

223 F. Supp. 3d 713 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 22, 2016

Thereafter the GOP filed this action to enjoin further proceedings by the Board in No. 2016-EB-RES-01 (referred to as Sapone v. … in Sapone v.

Mohr v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees

99 F. Supp. 2d 934 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 12, 2000

Sheehan v. Donlen Corp., 173 F.3d 1039, 1044 (7th Cir.1999). Ms. Mohr’s direct evidence is the remark in the dismissal letter that the Board intended to “turn over of the staff to reculture the school.” … See City of Oklahoma City v.

Gakuba v. Brown

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 20, 2020

Brown to file his pleadings, he had forwarded his letter to the Clerk’s office. On July 25, 2019, Ms. Brown wrote to Mr. … Richeson v.

Brown v. Saul

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 2020

See Israel v. Colvin, 840 F.3d 432, 439 (7th Cir. 2016) (finding that “[t]here is always a danger when lawyers and judges attempt to interpret medical reports”); Browning v. … See Moon v.

Porter v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees

187 F.R.D. 563 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 10, 1999

It is undisputed that the total amount due Plaintiff under the settlement conference is $90,977.05. 3 Porter v. Chicago Board of Education, 981 F.Supp. 1129 (N.D.Ill.1997). … Reintjes Co., Inc. v. Riley Stoker Corp., 71 F.3d 44, 48 (1st Cir.1995). See also, Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. v.

Burke v. Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees

149 F. Supp. 2d 384 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 14, 2001

Brown succeeded Moore as Howe’s principal and held that position through January 1999. Valias is the CEO of the Board. … There is no indication in the record that Vallas and Brown were not still employed by the Board at the time the original pro se complaint was filed and, as the CEO of the Board and the principal of Howe, respectively, it