Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersilnd

10,000+ results

1.55s

  • Arnold v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board

    752 F. Supp. 249 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 15, 1990

    Rose v. … Johnson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Board of Education

    624 F. Supp. 842 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 9, 1985

    As the Board concedes, the Secretary, must play a role in monitoring the Board’s expenditure of federal funds. … Board’s proposed projects and the reasonableness of the Board’s projected costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roberts v. BOARD OF EDUC.

    48 F. Supp. 2d 1098 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 25, 1999

    48 F.Supp.2d 1098 (1999) Jo Ann ROBERTS, Plaintiff, v. … See Honore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pillsbury Co. v. Alton Box Board Co.

    83 F.R.D. 132 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 28, 1979

    This is not a situation like that present in Shapiro v. … Payne v. Howard, 75 F.R.D. 465, 472 (D.D.C.1977).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Williams v. State Board of Elections

    696 F. Supp. 1561 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 4, 1988

    This order is identical to Cristancho v. National Broadcasting Co., 117 F.R.D. 609 (N.D.Ill. 1987).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Chicago Board of Education

    176 F.R.D. 547 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 20, 1997

    See Philips Medical Systems Intern., B.V. v. Bruetman, 982 F.2d 211, 214 (7th Cir.1992); see also Crown Life Ins. Co. v. … But see Newman v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lavin v. Chicago Board of Education

    73 F.R.D. 438 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 14, 1977

    Pasadena City Board of Education v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424 , 96 S.Ct. 2697 , 49 L.Ed.2d 599 (1976); Indianapolis School Commissioners v. Jacobs, 420 U.S. 128 , 95 S.Ct. 848 , 43 L.Ed.2d 74 (1975). … The plaintiff satisfies the Article III requirement of standing as she alleges injury in fact from the actions of the Board of Education defendants. See, e. g., Flast v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Williams v. State Board of Elections

    696 F. Supp. 1559 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 20, 1988

    See Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 , 106 S.Ct. 2752 , 92 L.Ed.2d 25 (1986). There may be material differences as to the situations experienced by blacks and Hispanics of voting age in Cook County, Illinois. … Jenkins v. United Gas Corp., 400 F.2d 28, 35 (5th Cir.1968). Specifically, Rule 23(c)(4) allows the court to divide a class into subclasses “when appropriate.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Williams v. State Board of Elections

    718 F. Supp. 1323 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 17, 1989

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Board of Education

    636 F. Supp. 1046 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 5, 1986

    At the same time it concedes, see Reply Memorandum at 8 n. 2, that the Board’s June 17 application “appears to materially assist implementation of the bilingual component of the Board’s desegregation plan and is eligible … What the government is really saying is that Congress has capped the Board’s share; this is not inconsistent with a holding that the Board still gets priority. Recall what “priority” means.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hillman v. Chicago School Reform Board

    131 F. Supp. 2d 973 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 2, 2001

    The Board moves for summary judgment. I deny the motion in part and grant it in part. Mr. … The question then is whether it is in the “scope” of the complaint, that is, whether it is “like or reasonably related to” the allegations contained in the EEOC complaint, Cheek v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Herrera v. Di Meo Brothers, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 16, 2023

    Abrego v. Wilkie, 907 F.3d 1004, 1015 (7th Cir. 2018) (quoting Boss v. Castro, 816 F.3d 910, 919–20 (7th Cir. 2016)); see also Swyear v. … Servs., Inc., 811 F.3d 866, 879 n.39 (7th Cir. 2016) (noting that the analytical framework for claims under Title VII, Section 1981 and the IHRA is “essentially identical” (quoting Brown v. Advoc. S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Banks v. Chicago Board of Education

    895 F. Supp. 206 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 21, 1995

    Defendants, Chicago Board of Education (the “Board”), Scott Feaman and Geraldine Johnson, have filed a motion to dismiss Count II and Ms. … Previously, she was employed by the Board *208 as a full-time substitute teacher.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board

    659 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 6, 1987

    Heirens v. Mizell, 729 F.2d 449, 466 (7th Cir.1984), quoting United States ex rel. Scott v. … Second, Jackson’s complaints about the number of Board members interviewing him and voting on his parole denial have been specifically held not to present constitutional infirmities. Newbury v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Santana v. Cook County Board of Review

    700 F. Supp. 2d 1023 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 30, 2010

    As to any procedural due process claim, Santana must assert a plausible (the TwomblyIqbal teaching) deprivation of a protected property or liberty interest without due process of law (Brown v. … Finally, AC Count V claims that Commissioners and Board employed Board as an “enterprise” to conduct racketeering activity in violation of RICO § 1962.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Board of Education

    636 F. Supp. 1050 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 14, 1986

    Board’s right to obtain relief in this Court. … For the Board’s petition for relief is clearly equitable, and a court of equity can deny relief to a litigant who comes to court with unclean hands. See, e.g., Shondel v. McDermott, 775 F.2d 859, 868 (7th Cir.1985).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Collie v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    642 F. Supp. 1147 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 9, 1986

    In practice, those remedies proved both too drastic for many of the situations which the Board encountered and too cumbersome to make prompt correction possible. Larimore v. … Unity Savings Ass’n v. FSLIC, 573 F.Supp. 137, 141 (N.D.Ill.1983). B.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Howard v. Board of Educ. Sycamore Dist.

    876 F. Supp. 959 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 8, 1995

    See Leahy v. *968 Board of Trustees of Community College Dist. No. 508, 912 F.2d 917 , 921 (7th Cir. 1990). … See Lysett v. University of Puerto Rico, 864 F.2d 881, 899-901 (1st Cir.1988); Hastings v. Hancock, 842 F.Supp. 1315, 1318 (D.Kan. 1993); Patricia H. v. Berkeley Unified Sch.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Ellis v. Board of Jewish Education

    722 F. Supp. 2d 1006 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 9, 2010

    In July 2009, the Board of Jewish Education (“BJE”) initiated an adversary proceeding seeking a determination of non-dischargeability under 11 U.S.C. § 523 . (Id. at 142.) … SDS Partners, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Long v. Board of Education, District 128

    167 F. Supp. 2d 988 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 14, 2001

    See Stearns v. Board of Educ. for Warren Twnshp. High School Dist. # 121, No. 99 C 5818, 1999 WL 1044832 , at *2-*3 (N.D.Ill. Nov.16, 1999). … .”); see also Bercovitch v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.