Case law

Jucha v. City of North Chicago

63 F. Supp. 3d 820 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 6, 2014

State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 632 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943) (“Symbolism is a primitive but effective way of communicating ideas.”). The Supreme Court reinforced this point in Brown v. … Brown, 131 S.Ct. at 2733 .

Faheem-El v. Klincar

620 F. Supp. 1308 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 25, 1985

Scott v. Illinois Parole and Pardon Board, 669 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied sub nom., McCombs v. Scott, 459 U.S. 1048 , 103 S.Ct. 468 , 74 L.Ed.2d 617 (1982). … The Board also does not take steps to ensure that reporting officers are available for cross-examination. Morrissey v.

Vickery v. Minooka Volunteer Fire Department

990 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 15, 1997

Kontos v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 826 F.2d 573, 576 (7th Cir.1987). … Baxter by Baxter v. Vigo County Sch. Corp., 26 F.3d 728, 734 (7th Cir.1994).

Williams v. University of Illinois

945 F. Supp. 163 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 15, 1996

Williams, in response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, concedes that the Board of Trustees (captioned as “The University of Illinois”) is immune from suit in federal court. See Kroll v. … See Ladien v. Bd. of Trustees, Univ. of Illinois, No. 93-C-6573, 1994 WL 395078 *7 (N.D.Ill. July 27, 1994) (research division established by the Board of Trustees entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity).

Deerbrook State Bank v. Conover

568 F. Supp. 696 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 9, 1983

Where Board approval is required, the Comptroller is bound to condition the granting of the charter on subsequent Board approval. Gravois Bank v. … Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Tsuetaki, 701 F.2d 677, 681 (7th Cir.1983); O’Conner v. Board of Education, 645 F.2d 578 , 580 (7th Cir.).

Marthon v. Maple Grove Condominium Ass'n

101 F. Supp. 2d 1041 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 22, 2000

McCoy v. WGN Continental Broad. … And as City of Edmonds v.

Atwood Grain & Supply Co. v. Growmark, Inc.

712 F. Supp. 1360 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 19, 1989

A well-established tenet of corporate law holds that a board of directors acting in the “ordinary and regular course of business”, Philadelphia National Bank v. B.S.F. … See also Whittaker Corp. v.

Burlington Northern, Inc. v. American Railway Supervisors Ass'n

359 F. Supp. 1047 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 22, 1973

See Burlington Northern, Inc. v. American Railway Supervisors Association, swpra. … Burlington Northern, Inc. v.

Koplin v. LABE FEDERAL SAV. AND LOAN

748 F. Supp. 1336 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 31, 1990

Sims v. … The proxy vote dealt with the reelection of two directors to the board.

Kauffman v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 461

124 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 12, 2000

Bell v. Duckworth, 861 F.2d 169, 170 (7th Cir. 1988). … It would also violate fundamental notions of due process if Branson, the Business Manager of Local 461, was present during the trial board deliberations and took part in them. See Curtis v.

Baron v. Carson

410 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 31, 1976

a member of the Board, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (1). … Jefferson Parish School Board, 251 F.Supp. 462, 463 (E.D.La.1966). The only case to which plaintiff points in support of his contention for coverage of state officials under § 1985(1) is Griffon v.

United States v. Greer

581 F. Supp. 1251 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 23, 1984

Scott v. Illinois Parole and Pardon Board, 669 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir. 1982) and Welsh v. Mizell, 668 F.2d 328 (7th Cir.1982). … Scott v. Illinois Parole and Pardon Board, 669 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir.1982) 1 or Welsh v.

CHICAGO TCHRS. U., LOCAL NO. 1, AFT/AFL/CIO v. Johnson

421 F. Supp. 1261 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 13, 1976

See e. g., King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 , 88 S.Ct. 2128 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1118 . (1968); Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 , 90 S.Ct. 1207 , 25 L.Ed.2d 442 (1970). … King v. Smith, supra; Rosado v. Wyman, supra.

Freeman v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 29, 2018

Claims Brought against Board and Lubin in his Official Capacity UIC Defendants move to dismiss the claims brought against the Board and against Lubin in his official capacity. … Quinn, 680 F.3d 875, 881 (7th Cir. 2012)(quoting Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 663 (1974)). The Board is deemed an instrumentality of the State of Illinois and is protected by the Eleventh Amendment.

Ridgeway v. INTERN. BROTH. OF ELEC. WKRS., ETC.

466 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 26, 1979

Kerckhoff, 369 F.Supp. 1165 (E.D.Mo., 1974) with Lafore v. Emblem Tape & Label Co., 448 F.Supp. 824 (D.Colo., 1978); Ortega v. Merit Ins. Co., 433 F.Supp. 135 (N.D.Ill., 1977); and Miranda v. … Lynam v. Livingston, 257 F.Supp. 520 (D.Del., 1966). Accordingly, defendant Board's objection to the filing of the Second Amended Complaint is overruled.

United States Ex Rel. Howard v. Ragen

59 F. Supp. 374 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 13, 1945

Ross v. Becker, 382 Ill. 404 , 47 N.E.2d 475 ; Purdue v. Ragen, 375 Ill. 98 , 30 N.E.2d 637 ; People ex rel. Cassidy v. McKinley, 372 Ill. 247 , 23 N.E.2d 50 ; People ex rel. Kerner v. … Later in People v.

Hartman v. Lisle Park District

158 F. Supp. 2d 869 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 16, 2001

See Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 , 103 S.Ct. 1684 , 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Johnson v. Mers, 279 Ill.App.3d 372, 380 , 216 Ill.Dec. 31 , 664 N.E.2d 668, 675 (1996); Sommer v. Oak Brook Park District Board of Park Commissioners, No. 95 C 3509, 1996 WL 422152 , at *11 (N.D.Ill. July 24, 1996).

Hickman v. Board of Education Hinsdale Township, Hinsdale High School District 86

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 29, 2023

.; Medina as next friend for N.M. v. Izquierdo, 594 F. Supp. 3d 1045, 1063 (N.D. Ill. 2022). And the Illinois School Code expressly permits a school board—not a school district or school—to be sued. Klean v. … Thus, the Board— not the School District or the School—is amenable to suit. See Snow v. J.

Bosco v. Chicago Transit Authority

164 F. Supp. 2d 1040 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 18, 2001

Maine v. … E.g., Felt v. Board of Trustees of Judges Ret. Sys., 107 Ill.2d 158 , 89 Ill.Dec. 855 , 481 N.E.2d 698 (1985); Kraus, 72 Ill.App.3d 833 , 28 Ill.Dec. 691 , 390 N.E.2d 1281 ; Miller v.

Frantz v. Sheet Metal Workers Union Local No. 73

470 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 10, 1979

E. g., Purcell v. Keane, 406 F.2d 1195 (3d Cir. 1969); Holdeman v. … In Horner v.