Case law

Patterson v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois R.

50 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 3, 1943

(the National Labor Railway Act) created a Board to be known as the National Railroad Adjustment Board for the purpose of hearing disputes between carriers and their employes. … That is also the opinion of the Court in Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 124 F.2d 235, 240 , although T realize that the expression of the court on this subject was, probably, dictum.

Grafman v. Century Broadcasting Corp.

762 F. Supp. 215 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 28, 1991

In Chevron Oil Co. v. … There is some authority that in such a case the board has conceded that demand would be futile. Abbey v. Computer & Comm. Tech. Corp., 457 A.2d 368 (Del.Ch.1983).

Sweis v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

681 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 24, 1988

Day was followed almost immediately in Evangelinos v. … See, e.g., Rolnick v. El Al Israel Airlines, Ltd., 551 F.Supp. 261, 263-64 (E.D.N.Y.1982), where passengers were injured while walking to passport control, after having obtained boarding passes and checked their bags.

Smith v. Village of Maywood

699 F. Supp. 157 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 19, 1988

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … As was stated in Pembauer v.

F. v. Board of Education of Chicago Public School District 299

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 2, 2022

(citing Courthouse News Serv. v. Brown, 908 F.3d 1063, 1068 (7th Cir. 2018)). III. … Judge Dow’s decision in Channell v. Chicago Board of Education, 2021 WL 5113876 (N.D. Ill.

Rossa v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc.

187 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 26, 1958

Payne v. Pullman Co., 1957, 13 Ill.App.2d 105 , 141 N.E.2d 83 . … Sigfred *392 v. Pan American World Airways, 5 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 13 . 4. Plaintiff asserts, on the authority of Moore v. Illinois C. R.

Ellerd v. Southern Pacific R.

191 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 28, 1961

Scarano v. Central R. Co. of N. J., 3 Cir., 1953, 203 F.2d 510 , affirming D.C.Pa.1952, 107 F.Supp. 622 ; Wallace v. Southern Pac. Co., D.C.Cal.1951, 106 F.Supp. 742 ; Bu-berl v. Southern Pac. … Inasmuch as the Court “determines the issue of fact as to due process against plaintiff” it has “no right to review the board’s order.” Ellerd v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co., 7 Cir., 241 F.2d 541, 545 .

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Burlington Northern Railroad

819 F. Supp. 745 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 13, 1993

It is also true that Gideon v. Wainwright concerned a particular criminal conviction in Florida and the claim of one inmate. Mar-burg v. … And it is true that the matter was not designated a “lead case,” as is sometimes done before the Board. The law is nicely stated by my brother Moran in Brotherhood Railway Carmen v.

Seghal v. Johnson

105 F. Supp. 3d 860 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 14, 2015

Sinai Hospital Medical Center v. Shalala, 196 F.3d 703, 708 (7th Cir.1999). These are demanding standards! … Ogbolumani, 557 F.3d at 734 ; see also Pouhova v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1007, 1011 (7th Cir.2013); Olowo v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 692, 699 (7th Cir.2004). Ogbolwmani shows that both conditions are met here.

Nasr v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

632 F. Supp. 1024 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 10, 1986

Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Jacobson, 713 F.2d 262, 270 (7th Cir.1983); Paul v. Premier Electrical Const, Co., 581 F.Supp. 721, 724 (N.D.Ill.1984). … The Illinois Supreme Court, in Chapski v.

Van Daele v. Vinci

294 F. Supp. 71 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 23, 1968

Bowman v. White, 388 F.2d 756 (4th Cir. 1968). … Mc-Manigal v. Simon, 382 F.2d 408 (7th Cir. 1967); Gray v. Morgan, 371 F.2d 172 (7th Cir. 1966).

Perez v. United States

850 F. Supp. 1354 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 14, 1994

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 546 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1495 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985).

Lundblade v. Franzen

631 F. Supp. 214 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 19, 1986

Hay good v. Younger, 769 F.2d 1350, 1354 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc) (citations omitted). Cf. Benson v. … Prisoner Review Board, 769 F.2d 396, 398 (7th Cir.1985) citing Trotter v. Klincar, 748 F.2d 1177, 1182 (7th Cir.1984) and United States ex rel Powell v.

Wielgos v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

688 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 20, 1988

As this Court said in Aerwey Laboratories, Inc. v. … Just last month the Court expressly adopted the same standard for Section 10(b) cases (Basic Inc. v.

87 South Rothschild Liquor Mart, Inc. v. Kozubowski

775 F. Supp. 1129 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 27, 1991

The Election Board’s second argument — that Liquor Mart’s attorneys devoted an excessive number of hours to their client’s suit — is equally unpersuasive. The Board contends that Philly’s v. … Finally, the Board’s suggestion that particular totals are too high is completely arbitrary, as pointed out by Liquor Mart. See Heiar v.

Mitchell v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

381 F. Supp. 2d 733 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 15, 2005

Dozier v. … See O’Neill v.

United States v. McDonald

301 F. Supp. 79 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 20, 1969

Yates v. United States, 404 F.2d 462, 466 (1st Cir. 1968). Finally, the defendant alleges that the Local Board did not comply with 32 C.F.R. … Sec. *85 1660.20(b) signed by the Clerk of the Local Board. The Court agreed with the defendant’s contention that the order was not valid because it was not issued by the entire Board. However, in United States v.

United States Ex Rel. Hancock v. Pate

223 F. Supp. 202 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 7, 1963

the province of the Board. … Morris v.

Walrath v. United States

842 F. Supp. 299 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 24, 1933

The Seventh Circuit has consistently ruled that parole boards are functionally equivalent to the judiciary. See, e.g., Thompson v. … Powell v. Irving, 684 F.2d 494 (7th Cir.1982) (parole board official’s review of parole application protected by absolute immunity.)

LeRose v. City of Zion/Police Department

696 F. Supp. 1222 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 4, 1988

The Board points out that in Kobylanski v. … Board’s reliance on Booker v. Chicago Board of Education, 75 Ill.App.3d 381 , 31 Ill.Dec. 250 , 394 N.E.2d 452 (1979) is unfounded.