Case law

Williams v. Chicago Housing Authority

207 B.R. 874 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 10, 1997

Williams points to Housing Authority of Franklin County v. Moore, 5 Ill.App.3d 883 , 284 N.E.2d 456, 460 (1972), and Sonntag v. … Thomas v. Chicago Housing Authority, 919 F.Supp. 1159, 1167 (N.D.Ill.1996) (Bucklo, J.) (citing Herring v.

Johns v. Baltimore & OR Co.

118 F. Supp. 317 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 20, 1954

Furthermore the Adjustment Board has docketed a proceeding involving a similar dispute, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 1st Div. … Of the aim of Congress in creating the Adjustment Board, the court said in Elgin, J. & E. R. Co. v.

Alvares v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 10, 2021

Because Alvares has failed to demonstrate that her assertions of age discrimination have any factual or legal support, the Board is entitled to summary judgment on the ADEA claim. See Williams v. … To make a showing of pretext, Alvares must present evidence suggesting that the Board’s proffered reason is a lie. Marnocha v. St. Vincent Hosp. & Health Care Ctr., Inc., 986 F.3d 711, 721 (7th Cir. 2021).

Hodges Ex Rel. Hodges v. Public Building Commission

864 F. Supp. 1493 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 14, 1994

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Consent Decree entered in United States v. Board of Education, 80 C 5174 (N.D.Ill). … Yonkers Board of Educ., 837 F.2d at 1224 . The "bigoted comments of a few citizens,” Metropolitan Housing Dev. Corp. v.

Rosas v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 17, 2021

Alternatively, the Board moves to dismiss Counts IV and V for failure to state a claim. … Carmody v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois, 893 F.3d 397, 403 (7th Cir. 2018).

Marr Oil Heat Mach. Corp. v. Hardinge Bros.

20 F.2d 241 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 15, 1927

Co. v. Sargent (C. … Also, to the same effect, United Shirt & Collar Co. v. Beattie (C. C. A.) 149 F. 736 ; Brown v. Huntington Piano Company (C. C. A.) 134 F. 735 ; Stevens Arms Co. v. Davenport et al. (C. C. A.) 134 F. 869 .

Vrdolyak v. City of Chicago

604 F. Supp. 1325 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 27, 1984

See Nekolny v. Painter, 653 F.2d 1164, 1167-68 (7th Cir.1981); McGuire v. City of Chicago, 592 F.Supp. 56, 58 (N.D.Ill.1984). … William Browning has been Assistant Commissioner since 1980. 4 .

Walker v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 25, 2021

551, and that the Board’s action was the “moving force” behind her injury, Hall v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 397 (1997)).

S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. Beman

14 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 15, 1936

the Board to answer. … Motion denied. 1 Bradley Lumber Company v. National Labor Relations Board (no opinion filed). 2 Bemis Bros. Bag Company v. Feidelson (no opinion filed). 3 Carlisle Lumber Co. v.

Cieslik v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2021

See Cole v. Illinois, 562 F.3d 812, 816 (7th Cir. 2009) (holding that the adoption of an improvement plan requiring daily and weekly schedules was not ma- terially adverse); Brown v. Illinois Dep’t of Nat. … The overarching problem with the Board’s argument is that the Board de- mands that Cieslik plead the elements of a prima facie case under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Sapia v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 30, 2020

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … But what matters is that it is not clear from the pleadings which issues or claims the Board seeks to preclude. See, e.g., Ocean Atl. Woodland Corp. v.

United States Ex Rel. King v. McGinnis

558 F. Supp. 1343 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 17, 1983

Burton v. Klincar, No. 82 C 7340 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 7, 1983); Bunting v. Longo, No. 82 C 1011 (N.D.Ill. Sept. 30, 1982). As stated in Greenholtz v. … However, in Walker v.

Doe v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America

145 F.R.D. 466 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Apr 27, 1992

Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education, 117 F.R.D. 394, 398-99 (N.D.Ill.1987). … Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co., 92 F.R.D. 32, 41-42 (E.D.Va.1981).

United States v. Manns

135 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 27, 1955

See Williams v. … In Chernekoff v.

Abney v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 27, 2021

The Board argues that Abney’s allegations do not meet the “high bar” required of hostile work environment claims. Swyear v. Fare Foods Corp., 911 F.3d 874, 881 (7th Cir. 2018). … See Ash v.

St. James Hospital v. Harris

535 F. Supp. 751 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 4, 1981

Topeka Presbyterian Manor, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Shawnee County, 195 Kan. 90 , 402 P.2d 802, 806 (1965); overruled on other grounds, Lutheran Home, Inc. v. … Therefore, the Board had jurisdiction over the disallowance; and *761 this court has jurisdiction of the case. Cleveland Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Califano, 444 F.Supp. 125 (E.D.N.C.1978), 594 F.2d 993 (4th Cir. 1979).

Jones v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 10, 2020

court, Ford v. … Louis Laborers’ Local 100 v.

Malec v. Sanford

191 F.R.D. 581 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 7, 2000

Eisenstadt v. … Little v.

Weppler v. Hershey

308 F. Supp. 447 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 3, 1969

Foley v. Hershey, 409 F.2d 827 , (7th Cir. 1969). The court said, at 829: “For the reasons ably expressed in Carey v. … Carey v. Local Board No. 2, supra, 297 F.Supp. at 260 .

Zito v. Moutal

174 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 31, 1959

In National Labor Relations Board v. … Appalachian Electric Power Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 1938, 93 F.2d 985, 989 . (Emphasis added.) Accord: National Labor Relations Board v. A. S.