Case law

Nussbacher v. Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Co.

61 F.R.D. 399 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 16, 1973

Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). … See, e. g., Hawes v. Oakland, 104 U.S. 450 , 26 L.Ed. 827 (1881) (lack of demand raised by city of Oakland), and Robison v. Caster, supra (issue raised by individual defendant’s executor).

Kibbons v. Board of Education of Taft School District 90

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 25, 2021

Overly v. … Avila v.

Taylor v. Country Club Hills School District 160

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 27, 2019

. § 1983, against several defendants: the District; the Board; the District’s Human Resources Director, Tracy Lett- Foreman; the Board’s President, Tamara Young; and individual Board members Margo Brown, Jacqueline … Powell then came out of the room and told Taylor that Board President Young and Board Members Margo Brown, Jacqueline Doss, Michael Humphrey, and Barbara Swain had voted to suspend her without pay until June 30

Telegraph Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance

564 F. Supp. 862 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 5, 1981

Schlafly v. Volpe, 495 F.2d 273, 280 (7th Cir.1974). … In Securities Investor Protection Corp. v.

Parmelee Transportation Company v. Keeshin

186 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 1960

Rogers v. Douglas Tobacco Board of Trade, Inc., 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 636 . The primary purpose of the statute is to protect the public from monopoly.” In Klor’s, Inc. v. … Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, supra; Rogers v.

Ernst v. Parkshore Club Apartments Ltd. Partnership

863 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 24, 1994

Spivey v. Brown, 150 Ill.App.3d 139 , 103 Ill.Dec. 876, 878 , 502 N.E.2d 23, 25 (1986); Milz v. M.J. Meadows, Inc., 234 Ill.App.3d 281 , 175 Ill.Dec. 276, 281 , 599 N.E.2d 1290, 1295 (1992). … See Management Ass’n of Ill., *658 Inc. v. Board of Regents of N. Ill. Univ., 248 Ill.App.3d 599 , 188 Ill.Dec. 124 , 136, 618 N.E.2d 694, 706 (1993) (citing Bremen State Bank v. Hartford Accident & Indem.

Graff v. National RR Passenger Corp.

264 F. Supp. 2d 725 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 30, 2003

See generally Doll v. Brown, 75 F.3d 1200, 1205-06 (7th Cir.1996) (Posner, J.) (discussing probabilistic injuries). The Illinois Supreme Court explicitly endorsed this “lost chance” doctrine in Holton v. … In contrast, in Meek v.

Federal Home Loan Bank v. Banc of America Funding Corp.

760 F. Supp. 2d 807 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 18, 2011

Bankers’ Trust Co. v. Tex. & Pac. Ry. Co., 241 U.S. 295, 309-10 , 36 S.Ct. 569 , 60 L.Ed. 1010 (1916), most recently reconfirmed by our Court of Appeals in Hukic v. … Nat’l Red Cross v.

Agbefe v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 11, 2021

Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Novotny, 442 U.S. 366, 378 (1979) (holding that 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) cannot be the basis for a claim to vindicate a right protected by Title VII); Brown v. Gen. Servs. … To support its argument, the Board cites Cornfield ex rel. Lewis v.

Schermerhorn v. County of McHenry, Illinois

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 12, 2025

In its Motion, the Board relies on Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 (1968) and Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), arguing that the First Amendment doesn’t protect Schermerhorn’s testimony. … Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 (1977) is an affirmative defense for which the County bears the burden of proof. Brown v. Leflore Cnty., 150 F. Supp. 3d 753, 769 (N.D. Miss. 2015). The Mt.

Taylor v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 27, 2020

Richardson v. Chi. Transit Auth., 926 F.3d 881, 886 (7th Cir. 2019).6 5 Taylor asserts the section 1983 claims against the Board based on the theory of municipal liability announced in Monell v. … McCoy v.

Torrence v. Chicago Tribune Co., Inc.

535 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 1, 1981

Torrence, in disputing the Board’s conclusion, incorrectly relies upon Lee v. Nesbitt, 453 F.2d 1309 (9th Cir. 1971), which he asserts demonstrates that the Board’s decision was arbitrary or capricious. … Board of Trustees of Buffalo Carpenters, 624 F.2d 1132 (2d Cir. 1980); Gordon v. ILWUPMA Benefit Funds, 616 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1980); Rehmar, supra, 555 F.2d 1362 . 11 . See, e.g., Reiherzer v.

Zhan v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 13, 2021

In Kimel v. Fla. … Ill. 2008) (Board of Trustees of a state university’s law school were a state agency for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment, and therefore immune from § 1983 and § 1981 suits for damages); Kroll v.

Mulvaney v. Stetson

470 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 29, 1979

In all of these cases, the plaintiff brought his corrective action shortly after an unfavorable Correction Board decision. See Homcy v. Resor, 147 U.S.App. D.C. 277, 455 F.2d 1345 (1971); Haines v. … See Homcy v. Resor, supra; Angle v. Laird, supra; Smith v. McNamara, supra; Ragoni v. United States, supra; Haines v. United States, supra; Lima v. Secretary of the Navy, supra. Contra Keeney v.

Partee v. Lane

528 F. Supp. 1254 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 8, 1981

Since the Illinois statute also gives great discretion to the Illinois Prisoner Review Board, see, e.g., Tucker v. … Partee’s reliance upon Garcia v. United States Board of Parole, 557 F.2d 100 (7th Cir. 1977), is misplaced for two reasons.

United States Ex Rel. Carioscia v. Meisner

331 F. Supp. 635 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 10, 1971

It is clear that the court should not and may not substitute its judgment for that of the Board. Wright v. Settle, supra; Freedman v. Looney, supra; Young v. Parker, supra. … Bey v. Connecticut Board of Parole, 443 F.2d 1079 (2d Cir. 1971); Goolsby v. Gagnon, 322 F.2d 460 (E.D. Wis.1971).

Johns v. Baltimore & OR Co.

118 F. Supp. 317 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 20, 1954

Furthermore the Adjustment Board has docketed a proceeding involving a similar dispute, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 1st Div. … Of the aim of Congress in creating the Adjustment Board, the court said in Elgin, J. & E. R. Co. v.

Hodges Ex Rel. Hodges v. Public Building Commission

864 F. Supp. 1493 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 14, 1994

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Consent Decree entered in United States v. Board of Education, 80 C 5174 (N.D.Ill). … Yonkers Board of Educ., 837 F.2d at 1224 . The "bigoted comments of a few citizens,” Metropolitan Housing Dev. Corp. v.

Rosas v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 17, 2021

Alternatively, the Board moves to dismiss Counts IV and V for failure to state a claim. … Carmody v. Board of Trustees of University of Illinois, 893 F.3d 397, 403 (7th Cir. 2018).

Marr Oil Heat Mach. Corp. v. Hardinge Bros.

20 F.2d 241 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 15, 1927

Co. v. Sargent (C. … Also, to the same effect, United Shirt & Collar Co. v. Beattie (C. C. A.) 149 F. 736 ; Brown v. Huntington Piano Company (C. C. A.) 134 F. 735 ; Stevens Arms Co. v. Davenport et al. (C. C. A.) 134 F. 869 .