Case law

Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP

251 F.R.D. 316 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 9, 2008

David Groehocinski, in his capacity as the Chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of CMGT, Inc., (“Plaintiff’), has moved for a protective order to prohibit the production of privileged documents to Defendants Mayer Brown … Co., v. Bull Data Sys., Inc., 145 F.R.D. 84, 87 (N.D.Ill.1992).

Brown v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

463 F. Supp. 2d 847 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 22, 2006

As Hackett v. Xerox Corp. … ,” as required by Blickenstaff v.

Brown v. Ford Motor Co.

96 F. Supp. 2d 813 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 9, 2000

The campaign was headed by James Brown (“Brown”), defendant’s Head of Human Resources at thé plant, and was overseen by Randy Griffin, Plant Manager. … See Hughes v. Brown, 20 F.3d 745, 747 (7th Cir.1994). 1.

Brown v. County of Cook

804 F. Supp. 2d 722 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2011

The Cook County Sheriffs Merit Board (“Merit Board”) is responsible for the testing administration and the certification of those eligible for promotion to sergeant or lieutenant. (PL’s Resp. to SOF ¶ 5.) … Hall v. Babb, 389 F.3d 758, 762 (7th Cir.2004).

Board of Trustees v. Moroni

905 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 25, 2012

Plaintiff Board of Trustees of the Automobile Mechanics’ Local No. 701 Union and Industry Pension Fund (“The Fund”) received a default judgment on December 7, 2010 against Elmhurst Lincoln Mercury, Inc. … The case cites Chicago Title & Trust Co. v.

Cortes v. Board of Governors

766 F. Supp. 623 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 5, 1991

In Tull v. … See also Smith v.

Carroll v. Social Security Board

44 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 25, 1941

United States v. Weitzel, 246 U.S. 533 , 38 S.Ct. 381 , 62 L.Ed. 872 . … The decision of the Social Security Board was correct and must be affirmed. An order accordingly will be entered June 25, 1941.

Brown v. United States Steel Corp.

698 F. Supp. 1375 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 1988

See Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 489 U.S. 24 , 25, 99 S.Ct. 295, 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). … Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295, 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978). The employer must merely present evidence to justify-a judgment in its favor.

Brown v. LaSalle Northwest National Bank

148 F.R.D. 584 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 25, 1993

However, as plaintiff recognizes, if the FTC regulation does not apply to Brown’s transaction, plaintiff has no RICO claim. … As to Brown, the allegations sufficiently identify the transaction involved and the loan document that contains the allegedly fraudulent omission. See Bankers Trust Co. v.

Mnyofu v. Board of Education

832 F. Supp. 2d 940 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 2, 2011

Mannoia v. Farrow, 476 F.3d 453, 457 (7th Cir.2007); see also Pearson v. … McTigue v. City of Chicago, 60 F.3d 381, 382 (7th Cir.1995) (McTigue). The Board cites *948 McTigue in support, but that case is readily distinguishable.

Wynn v. Board of Education

815 F. Supp. 2d 1007 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · May 17, 2011

A school board, therefore, “must act within its statutory authority and has no inherent powers beyond those specifically granted.” Evans v. Benjamin Sch. Dist. … Board of Education v. Jackson, 401 Ill. App.3d 24 , 339 Ill.Dec. 665 , 927 N.E.2d 206 (Ill.App.Ct.2010), cited by Dr. Wynn, does not support the opposite conclusion.

Brown v. District 299-Chicago Public Schools

762 F. Supp. 2d 1076 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 27, 2010

Brown voluntarily dismissed defendant Illinois State Board of Education. The Board of Education of the City of Chicago (“the school board”) moves for summary judgment on the § 1983 and ADA claims. I. … According to the school board, § 1983 may be used to remedy constitutional but not statutory IDEA violations. The school board acknowledges that a Seventh Circuit case, Marie O. v.

Dell v. Board of Education

918 F. Supp. 212 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Dec 12, 1995

Dell v. Board of Educ., Township High Sch. Dist. 113, 32 F.3d 1053, 1064 (7th Cir.1994). … Brown v. Griggsville Comm. Unit Sch. Dist.

Fennerty v. Board of Education

949 F. Supp. 2d 826 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 2013

See Darchak v. … In Shegog v.

Sanner v. Board of Trade

181 F.R.D. 374 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 8, 1998

ANALYSIS The court in Harmony Gold U.S.A., Inc. v. … When Ferruzzi failed to abide by this request, the BCC recommended that the CBOT’s Board of Directors take emergency action. (Id. Ex. 1 ¶ 8.)

Doage v. Board of Regents

950 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 8, 1997

Dunn v. Soo Line R.R. Co., 864 F.Supp. 64, 65 (N.D.Ill.1994). … Ash v. Wallenmeyer, 879 F.2d 272, 275 (7th Cir.1989).

Railroad Labor Board v. Robertson

3 F.2d 488 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 6, 1924

Congress has made no provision for the enforcement of the decisions of the Labor Board through the courts. The Supreme Court in Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Labor Board, 261 U. S. 72, 79 , 43 S. Ct. 278 , 67 L. … Nor is the inquiry before the Labor Board under consideration here a fishing expedition into private affairs, as was hold to be the case in Harriman v.

Moore-Fotso v. Board of Education

211 F. Supp. 3d 1012 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Sep 29, 2016

Modrowski v. … (holding that the “Board did not have the authority to assign a cadre substitute to ‘one place to work’ ”); see also Herr v. City of Chi., 479 F.Supp.2d 834, 842 (N.D.

Ortega v. Chicago Board of Education

280 F. Supp. 3d 1072 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 21, 2017

The Board cites Williams v. Imperial Eastman Acquisition Corp., 994 F.Supp. 926 (N.D. … The Board miscites Mattenson v.

Wahl v. Brown & Sharpe Co.

9 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Feb 20, 1935

In Wahl v. N. E. Norstrom, etc., Co. (D. C.) 19 F.(2d) 544 , the claim was held valid upon grounds there fully stated. The decree was affirmed in (C. C. A.) 27 F.(2d) 635 . To the same effect is Norstrom v. Wahl (C. C. … A.) 39 F.(2d) 791 ; and a finding, of contempt growing out of the same litigation was approved in Norstrom v. Wahl (C. C. A.) 41 F.(2d) 910 .