Case law

Bastian v. Personnel Board

108 Ill. App. 3d 672 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 13, 1982

(Hughes v. Illinois Public Aid Com. (1954), 2 Ill. 2d 374, 380 , 118 N.E.2d 14 ; Miller v. Police Board (1976), 38 Ill. App. 3d 894 , 349 N.E.2d 544 .) … Although an agency’s interpretation of its rules must be accorded substantial discretion (Scheffki v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners (1974), 23 Ill.

Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal Board

295 Ill. App. 3d 242 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 20, 1998

App. 3d 9, 14-15 , 549 N.E.2d 591, 596 (1989), and Chrysler Corp. v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board, 69 Ill. App. 3d 207, 211 , 387 N.E.2d 351, 355 (1979). … Showplace Theatre Co. v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 145 Ill. App. 3d 774, 777 , 495 N.E.2d 1312, 1315 (1986), citing Cherry Bowl, Inc. v. Property Tax Appeal Board, 110 Ill.

Brown v. City of Evanston

4 Ill. App. 2d 124 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 17, 1955

Plaintiffs rely on DeKam v. City of Streator, 316 Ill. 123 . … While the facts in DeKam v. City of Streator, 316 Ill. 123 , and in Avery v.

Brown v. ESTATE OF HAMM

341 Ill. App. 3d 1129 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 20, 2003

App.3d 1129 BROWN v. ESTATE OF HAMM 5-01-0810 Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District. August 20, 2003. Disposition of Cases by Order in the Appellate Court under Supreme Court Rule 23. Rev'd & rem.

Brown v. Kelly Coal Co.

162 Ill. App. 65 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 26, 1911

In Peebles v. … In Aetitus v.

Abbey Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Brown

47 Ill. App. 3d 719 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 5, 1977

Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, pars. 281-288), alleging that Edward and Bessie Brown, defendants, owed plaintiff the sum of $735 in payment for certain plumbing work, labor, and materials requested by and furnished to defendants. … (Page v. Helland (1st Dist. 1974), 17 Ill. App. 3d 414 , 308 N.E.2d 333 (abstract opinion).) As stated in Belcher v.

Algozino v. Police Board

111 Ill. App. 2d 34 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 6, 1969

Brown v. Chicago Transit Authority

341 Ill. App. 3d 1100 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 21, 2003

App.3d 1100 BROWN v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY No. 1-02-2816. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. August 21, 2003. Disposition of Cases by Order in the Appellate Court under Supreme Court Rule 23. Dismissed.

Thomas v. Police Board

90 Ill. App. 3d 1101 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 17, 1980

In discussing “cause” the court in Kreiser v. Police Board (1976), 40 Ill. … (Coursey v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners (1967), 90 Ill. App. 2d 31, 37 , 234 N.E.2d 339, 341 ; Crowell v. Police Board (1975), 32 Ill. App. 3d 552 , 336 N.E.2d 573 ; Kelly v. Police Board (1975), 25 Ill.

Brown v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

176 Ill. App. 502 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 15, 1912

The rule for the construction of contracts is clearly laid down in the case of Johnson v. Humboldt Ins. … Dent v. Davidson, 52 Ill. 109 and McDole v. McDole, 106 Ill. 452 .

Village of Matherville v. Brown

34 Ill. App. 3d 298 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 24, 1975

Brown and ftessie M. Brown. Appeal is also taken from the denial of the motion of plaintiff to file an amended complaint in the action. … (Suvada v. White Motor Co. (1965), 32 Ill.2d 612, 613 , 210 N.E.2d 182 .)

Westlake Finance Co. v. Brown

112 Ill. App. 2d 142 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 18, 1969

Crane Paper Stock Co. v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 86 Ill App2d 90, 94-95, 230 NE2d 273 .

Brown v. Chicago Transit Authority

123 Ill. App. 2d 145 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 6, 1970

Defendant has relied upon the decisions of Davis v. South Side El. R. Co., 292 Ill 378, 127 NE 66 (1920) and Darda v. Chicago Transit Authority, 100 Ill App2d 94, 241 NE2d 478 (1968) . … In a more recent decision of Olinger v.

Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co.

237 Ill. App. 145 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 9, 1925

Voorhees v. Chicago & A. R. Co., 215 Ill. App. 531 ; Heidenreich v. Bremner, 260 Ill. 439 ; Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Leiner, supra. … Dickinson v. Industrial Board, 280 Ill. 342 ; Kusturin v. Chicago & A. R. Co., 287 Ill. 306 ; Curran v. Chicago Short Line Ry. Co., 198 Ill. App. 154 ; White v. Jackson, 221 Ill. App. 129 ; Jeneary v. Chicago & I.

Lewis, Yockey & Brown, Inc. v. Fetzer

463 Ill. Dec. 588 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 9, 2022

In Benzakry v. … See Taylor v. Pekin Insurance Co., 231 Ill. 2d 390, 395 (2008); Harshman v. DePhillips, 218 Ill. 2d 482, 501 (2006); Village of Chatham v. County of Sangamon, 216 Ill. 2d 402, 429 (2005).

Brown v. ACMI Pop Division

Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 2, 2007

For example, in Leopold v. … In support, Brown cites Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc., 25 Cal. 4th 387, 21 P.3d 797, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 130 (2001).

Myre v. Board of Education of Seneca Township High School District No. 160

108 Ill. App. 3d 440 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 9, 1982

App. 3d 1020 , 422 N.E.2d 76 ; Hamer v. Board of Education (1978), 66 Ill. App. 3d 7 , 383 N.E.2d 231 .) … Wallace v. Labrenz (1952), 411 Ill. 618 , 104 N.E.2d 769 ; Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control Board (1980), 88 Ill. App. 3d 71 , 410 N.E.2d 98 ; August H. Skoglund Co. v.

Finnerty v. Personnel Board

303 Ill. App. 3d 1 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 1, 1999

McTigue v. Personnel Board of the City of Chicago, 299 Ill. … Brown v. Chicago Park District, 296 Ill. App. 3d 867, 875 , 695 N.E.2d 1315, 1320 (1998). Thus, the language of the agency rule is given its ordinary meaning. Brown v. Chicago Park District, 296 Ill.

Will County Board v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

319 Ill. App. 3d 545 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 28, 2001

Fairview Area Citizens Taskforce v. Pollution Control Board, 198 Ill. App. 3d 541, 550 , 555 N.E.2d 1178, 1184 (1990). … The board relies on Waste Management of Illinois, Inc. v. Pollution Control Board, 123 Ill.

Brown v. Shubert Theatrical Co.

166 Ill. App. 322 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 13, 1911

Brown, Clarice F. Sanderson, Emily F. … The Statute of Frauds of the State of Wisconsin is controlling (Miller v.