Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.51s
186 N.E.3d 1066 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 30, 2021
Still, the State argues Tarik’s sentence does not qualify because he is eligible for up to 50% good conduct credit for the sentences imposed on the nonmurder offenses. … We quote a portion of the findings below and insert the relevant citations where they apply: “Clearly, these are juveniles.
Cited 24 timesPublished312 Ill. App. 3d 638 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 28, 2000
That is clearly a matter of public concern. Cf. In re R.M., 288 Ill. … Therefore, the instant case, even if it were otherwise moot, qualifies for review.
Cited 4 timesPublished2023 IL App (1st) 221098-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 23, 2023
We disagree that these purported discrepancies support plaintiff’s contention that Greenlaw omitted materially qualifying information. … Indeed, when specifically asked whether she placed trust in Greenlaw in 2017, plaintiff responded clearly: “No.”
Cited 0 timesUnpublished2015 IL App (1st) 130132 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 21, 2015
Judge, the CODIS administrator when they issue a report that there is an association, he, the report they generate, actually clearly states this is not a basis to make an arrest. … On recross, she testified that she observed her attacker’s face twice but she did not “know how clearly [she] saw it at the time.”
Cited 11 timesPublished344 Ill. App. 3d 1 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 27, 2003
Pursuant to these terms, count I of the complaint requested a declaratory judgment construing the lease and option to purchase, particularly the above-mentioned paragraph 33, in order to establish the purchase price of the … The hearing was not continued for consideration of additional issues, nor did the court overtly indicate any intent to retain jurisdiction, as it clearly did in Guzik.
Cited 29 timesPublished2023 IL App (4th) 230145-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 22, 2023
that clearly. … Rather, “to enjoy any such immunity flowing from the exclusivity provision of the Act, the co-employee’s tortious act must have been committed in the course of his employment.” Id.
Cited 0 timesUnpublished156 Ill. App. 3d 222 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 29, 1987
Furthermore, as defendant seemingly concedes, his 1980 conviction for armed robbery in itself qualified him, under section 5 — 5—3.2(b)(i), for an extended sentence. … If the General Assembly had intended that proceeds be utilized again to impose a more severe penalty for those offenses, such intent would be more clearly expressed.
Cited 18 timesPublished2019 IL App (4th) 190136 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 5, 2020
. ¶5 In July 2009, after a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) test established Roderick as M.J.’s father, the trial court entered an order establishing a parent-child relationship between Roderick and M.J. … Rhonda argues the payments she received should be considered loans, rather than gifts, and should not qualify as part of her income.
Cited 37 timesPublished2023 IL App (1st) 211652-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 12, 2023
One of Nora’s daughters, Kathy, testified that “I don’t think there’s been enough said about who’s been with my mother the most and who’s probably the most qualified to understand the deep decline that she’s gone into this … A finding is against the manifest weight when the “ ‘opposite conclusion is clearly apparent or the fact finder’s finding is palpably erroneous and wholly unwarranted, is clearly the result of passion or prejudice, or appears
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Dec 14, 1999
Clearly, the jury rejected Nilsson's request for consequential damages. The standard of review of a jury verdict is whether the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence. NWI , 291 Ill. … to read the promissory notes before signing them and discover that the terms of the notes were not the same as the terms that defendant claims were presented to him orally by Slade; and (2) Nilsson was an experienced or qualified
Cited 0 timesPublished47 Ill. App. 3d 1054 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 13, 1977
We believe that this evidence is sufficient to establish the existence of a custom. … any inference of departure from an established standard of safety practice.
Cited 27 timesPublished32 N.E.3d 211 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 18, 2015
Defendant has not established McKinney did or said anything to indicate defendant had no right to refuse. The warning to motorist reads, in pertinent part, "you are warned: 1. … Defendant voluntarily consented to the blood test and clearly had a choice whether to consent to testing.
Cited 14 timesUnpublishedJ. Maki Construction Co. v. Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters
379 Ill. App. 3d 189 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 1, 2008
Plaintiffs alleged that the banner imputed a criminal conviction to Maki, thereby establishing defamation per se to Maki individually. … Instead, the trial court instructed the jury that defendants had a qualified privilege to publish the handbill but lost the privilege if they acted with malice.
Cited 28 timesPublished2020 IL App (3d) 140543-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 7, 2020
HA is a rare disorder that causes the patient’s own immune system to attack and eventually destroy healthy red blood cells. … If A’s testimony is offered for the purpose of establishing that B said this, it is clearly admissible. Leonardi, 168 Ill. 2d at 99.
Cited 1 timesUnpublishedLittle v. East Lake Fork Special Drainage District
166 Ill. App. 3d 209 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 11, 1988
The district has failed to demonstrate that the legislature acted unreasonably or arbitrarily in establishing the statutory scheme embodied by the amendments to the Code. … The legislature clearly intended the treasurer be reimbursed for the “actual costs for his services.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 42, pars. 4 — 36, 4 — 37.)
Cited 2 timesPublishedTCRG SN4057, LLC v. Illinois Department of Revenue
2024 IL App (1st) 231389-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 30, 2024
¶ 49 Importantly, the presence in this case exceeds what does not qualify as a substantial nexus—which the Illinois Supreme Court has described as “sporadic,” “occasional,” or “incidental” contacts with the state. … ¶ 69 In sum, the Tribunal correctly concluded that the record did not demonstrate a basis for TCRG’s claim of constitutional immunity from taxation here, either regarding its activity with a substantial nexus with
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedHorwitch v. The Chicago Board of Election Commissioners
2023 IL App (1st) 230203-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 21, 2023
aggregate as a slate, but if they do, then they must each, in the aggregate, have a sufficient number of signatures to qualify for the minimum requirement. … Clearly and plainly stated, neither the language of the Municipal Code nor the language of the Election Code expressly disallows slates.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedLa Salle National Bank v. County of Du Page
54 Ill. App. 3d 387 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 22, 1977
They noted that the Thistle Creek area is well established and basically a neighborhood of its own. … It is clearly evident to us that the trial judge exhibited a considerable amount of impatience with defense counsel on a number of occasions.
Cited 12 timesPublishedPeople v. Jackson Opinion corrected 8/9/05
Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 30, 2005
We begin our analysis by recognizing the well-established rule that "[a]ll statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and the burden of rebutting that presumption is on the party challenging the validity of the statute to … demonstrate clearly a constitutional violation."
Cited 0 timesPublishedAppellate Court of Illinois · Apr 14, 2011
Clearly, she was “assisting the prosecution.” The question remains, however, whether she is an “entity.” … While Lawson seems to implicitly acknowledge that a municipality can qualify as an entity, it in no way holds, or even implies, that a person cannot qualify as an entity. 2 We find it unnecessary to
Cited 0 timesUnpublished
Ask Donna