Case law

Board of Education of Gardner-South Wilmington High School District 73 v. Village of Gardner

2014 IL App (3d) 130364 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 13, 2015

The agreement clearly grants the Village a mere 2 To the extent that section 11-74.4-8(b) requires that the license agreement needs to qualify as a redevelopment project cost to authorize the … Village’s payment of tax increment funds to the District, the license agreement clearly qualifies.

100 Lake v. Novak

971 N.E.2d 1195 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 22, 2012

-7-  Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act. … Immunity Act, which would otherwise bar the plaintiff’s action.

In Re AB

308 Ill. App. 3d 227 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 19, 1999

Over respondent's objection that it did not qualify as a business record, the trial court admitted the service plan into evidence pursuant to section 115-5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code of Criminal Procedure … We cannot say that the opposite conclusion is clearly evident from the record or that the trial court's conclusion is unreasonable, arbitrary, and not based on the evidence presented.

People v. Accardi

58 Ill. App. 2d 364 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 26, 1965

The constitutional guarantees against search and seizure are not against all searches and seizures but only against those that are unreasonable and do not extend immunity from search upon lawful arrest. People v. … No other witnesses were called, and we cannot say that the court’s judgment, in denying the motion to suppress, rested on doubtful, improbable or unsatisfactory evidence, or clearly insufficient evidence.

People v. Jones

241 Ill. App. 3d 228 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 11, 1993

Defendant argues there is no showing on the record that Fitch had the experience or training necessary to qualify him as an expert. … Finally, the opinion was clearly helpful to an understanding of his own testimony and that of R.M.B. We find no error in allowing the jury to hear Detective Fitch’s opinion.

People v. Salgado

263 Ill. App. 3d 238 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 14, 1994

Unless a prior inconsistent statement clearly qualifies under section 115 — 10.1, it is not admissible as substantive evidence. People v. Redd (1990), 135 Ill. 2d 252, 314 . … Some qualified under section 115 — 10.1 as substantive evidence, and others did not.

Insurance Co. of North America v. Krigos

196 Ill. App. 3d 200 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Mar 6, 1990

Krigos’ policy clearly and unambiguously excluded coverage for negligent entrustment. … Krigos’ policy clearly and unambiguously excluded negligent entrustment, and the trial court properly denied coverage.

In re Marriage of Fields

Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 3, 1996

Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the trial did not clearly abuse its discretion in its property division and debt allocation. … Reviewing the record before us, although this court may have decided differently, we cannot conclude that the trial court clearly abused its discretion by determining that (1) McGee was not qualified as an expert, and (2)

Village of McCook v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

335 Ill. App. 3d 32 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 7, 2002

Sections 12 and 15.1 of the Act (50 ILCS 750/12, 15.1 (West 2000)) clearly demonstrate the legislature’s intent that only the Attorney General would enforce compliance with the Act. … Section 15.1, the governmental immunity provision, expressly states that “[t]his Section may not be offered as a defense in any judicial proceeding brought by the Attorney General under Section 12 to compel compliance with

Methodist Medical Center v. Ingram

78 Ill. App. 3d 944 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 7, 1979

Defendant Ingram determined that Hunt was medically indigent and thus qualified for financial assistance under the act, but payment offered to the plaintiff was in the amount of *591, not the applied-for amount of *3,545.80 … Such limited liability for the townships and their taxpayers is clearly the object of the rules and regulations of the Department of Public Aid.

People v. Gary

49 Ill. App. 3d 704 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 22, 1977

established by the evidence. … The obvious objective of defendant’s counsel in the argument in the instant case was to appeal to the jury for mercy, since the evidence clearly established that defendant used a gun in obtaining the *55 from Foreman.

People v. Butorac

2013 IL App (2d) 110953 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 19, 2014

procedure, and the roadblock was “clearly a systematic operation.” … If checkpoints were established only at public docks, lakeside residents would be forever immune from compliance with boating regulations.

Ulm v. Memorial Medical Center

2011 IL App (4th) 110421 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 6, 2012

To qualify as a clear mandate of public policy, “a matter must strike at the heart of a citizen’s social rights, duties, and responsibilities.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) … Illinois Rule of Evidence 902(11) defines a qualifying certification with respect to a domestic record, in part, as “a written declaration under oath subject to the penalty of perjury.”

People v. Wasson

211 Ill. App. 3d 264 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 4, 1991

In the present case, the trial court clearly acted within its discretion in allowing Cooly’s testimony. … Defendant further argues Cooly never testified post-traumatic stress syndrome is recognized and accepted in child sexual abuse cases, and the State thus failed to establish it as being admissible under section 115—7.2.

People v. Newman

Appellate Court of Illinois · May 9, 2006

Moreover, Whitfield does not stand for the proposition that allegations of improper MSR admonishments are immune from forfeiture in postconviction proceedings. … OSAD was clearly ineffective in moving to withdraw, either in failing to confer with defendant regarding his allegations, or in failing to raise those allegations in the appeal.

Board of Education of the City of Chicago v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

2014 IL App (1st) 130285 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 2, 2014

Consequently, under the CBA, the grievances are arbitrable. ¶ 56 The Board, however, argues that the Union’s grievances are inarbitrable because the Board reserved a managerial right to establish performance … It clearly can ***.”).

Philip Henrici Co. v. Alexander

198 Ill. App. 568 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 12, 1916

The complainant contends that the court should have entered a decree in accordance with the prayer of the bill; that the evidence clearly established that the defendants were guilty of a conspiracy to injure the business … In the case at bar, we are clearly of the opinion that there was no strike as a matter of fact.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Kiszkan

Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 17, 2004

on her own initiative qualified Matricard for the multi-car discount. … Although the responsibility for the misrepresentation is clearly disputed, the real question is whether the dispute is material to the issue of coverage under the PLUP. See Protective Insurance Co. v. Coleman , 144 Ill.

Thurmond v. Monroe

235 Ill. App. 3d 281 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 14, 1992

App. 3d at 822 (and the cases cited therein)), they have done so where the proffered expert was deemed qualified to testify. … Here, we believe counsel for plaintiffs clearly laid the proper foundation when plaintiff Barbara testified that the photograph was an accurate representation of the Blazer when she saw it after the accident.

Board of Trustees v. Taylor

114 Ill. App. 3d 318 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 25, 1983

Trainees in the program must qualify under CETA income level requirements and are evaluated and recruited by the Illinois Job Services Department. … The Act established that tenured status may be achieved by faculty members within all of the State’s community colleges.