Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersillappct

10,000+ results

1.00s

  • Advocate Health & Hospitals Corp. v. Bank One, N.A.

    Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 19, 2004

    The statements also clearly establish that the client's signature was notarized, yet they do not indicate that an actual assumption of the client's identity was necessary to gain the notary's endorsement. … We also point out that the documents clearly disclose that the attorney tendered the covenant not to sue bearing the client's forged signature and that the hospital tendered its check, but they do not establish that the notarized

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Faculty Ass'n of District 205, IEA-NEA v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

    175 Ill. App. 3d 880 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 26, 1988

    Section 21—25 requires that a school service personnel certificate shall be issued to only those qualified nurses holding a bachelor’s degree from a recognized institution of higher learning. … The arbitrator’s opinion clearly declared Fox tenured based on an interpretation, right or wrong, of the parties’ contract.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Illini Media Co. v. Department of Revenue

    279 Ill. App. 3d 432 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 19, 1996

    We find the educational use was clearly established by the record. … If only the identifiable portion of a property is used for an exempt purpose, while the rest of the property is used primarily for a nonexempt purpose (or not at all), only the portion used for the exempt purpose qualifies

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Lael v. Warga

    155 Ill. App. 3d 1005 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 21, 1987

    Applying Garrett and Ash to the facts of the instant case, we conclude the petitioners clearly and convincingly established John Warga was a habitual drunkard. … Warga’s own statements plus the testimony of his stepchildren, the Fulfers, combined to clearly establish this drinking pattern continued up to the time of the hearing.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • A. P. Green Services Division of Bigelow-Leptak Corp. v. Fair Employment Practices Commission

    19 Ill. App. 3d 875 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 10, 1974

    It should be noted that both Waters and King were qualified bricklayers and had experience in all types of brick work. … It was also established that none of them were black. James Corrado testified for A. P.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • People v. MacK

    17 Ill. App. 3d 352 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 23, 1974

    In the instant case, the facts were clearly set out, and the trial judge ruled on them. Here, the judge simply answered a defense argument. … The trial court is not immune from knowledge of the nature of an area in the city. (People v. Biocic (1967), 80 Ill.App.2d 65 .) In Faltysek v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Hunley

    313 Ill. App. 3d 16 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 1, 2000

    The degree of knowledge or experience necessary to qualify the witness as an expert depends on the complexity of the subject matter and the likelihood of error if the witness is not properly qualified. … To qualify as hearsay, an out-of-court statement must be offered to establish the truth of the matter asserted. People v. Rogers, 81 Ill. 2d 571 (1980).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Marlowe v. Village of Wauconda

    91 Ill. App. 3d 874 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 22, 1980

    Clearly, plaintiffs’ building would not meet that test. … It is well established that a post-deprivation hearing can satisfy due process requirements (Goffinet v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Norwegian American Hospital, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

    210 Ill. App. 3d 318 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 21, 1991

    The Department of Revenue, on the other hand, argues that Norwegian American has not met its burden of clearly and conclusively establishing that the challenged properties are entitled to tax-exempt status. … If the party seeking the exemption can establish that the property is used primarily for purposes reasonably necessary for the accomplishment and fulfillment of the institution’s objectives and administration, an exemption

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Dempsey v. Johnson

    69 N.E.3d 236 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Nov 10, 2016

    Act (Tort Immunity Act) (745 ILCS 10/1-101 et seq. … an immunity to cover only negligence."

    Cited 13 timesUnpublished
  • Petkus v. Girzadas

    177 Ill. App. 3d 323 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 7, 1988

    Decedent clearly exhibited signs of coronary artery disease, and the medical care failed to adequately manage his cardiac condition in the hospital. … Summary judgment may be appropriate where plaintiff fails to establish the standard of care by means of an affidavit or deposition of a doctor.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Lombardo v. Reliance Elevator Co.

    315 Ill. App. 3d 111 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jun 30, 2000

    But the failures of the bank and the maintenance company do not establish a defense for WS against plaintiffs claim. Rather, they establish grounds for WS’s counterclaims. … The burden of establishing the qualifications of an expert witness is on the proponent of his testimony, and it is within the discretion of the trial court to determine whether the witness has been qualified.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Stinson v. Chicago Board of Election Commissioners

    407 Ill. App. 3d 874 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 25, 2011

    debt of over I600 1 in unpaid traffic tickets and that, when petitioner filed his statement for candidacy under section 10—5 of the Illinois Election Code (10 ILCS 5/10—5 (West 2008)), he was untruthful because he was not qualified … After examining the evidence, the hearing officer held that respondent proved by a preponderance of the evidence that petitioner currently owes the debt, while petitioner failed to establish that the debt was not his.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Frederick v. City of Peoria

    203 Ill. App. 486 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 10, 1916

    The appellee was 'first appointed as a police officer in November, 1905, and qualified as such officer by giving the bond required by the ordinances of the city, and taking the required oath of office. … It has been clearly settled in this State that the city had no such right. (People v. Bradford, 267 Ill. 486 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Gordon

    356 Ill. App. 3d 447 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 8, 2005

    However, we note that West was a criminal case brought by the State, and as such, liberty interests of the defendant were clearly at stake. … App. 3d at 188 ), the State should have engaged the services of an independent and unbiased Illinois fire investigator, perhaps even licensed, rather than a fire investigator who was so clearly intertwined in conflicts of

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Beverly Bank v. Board of Review of Will County

    193 Ill. App. 3d 130 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 15, 1990

    The findings of fact contained in the written order of the trial court set forth clearly the history of this action. … In addition, petitioners’ evidence clearly established that Pollack and Weis, each with 28 years’ experience in real estate tax law, were entitled to the “senior litigator” rate of $195 per hour; that Gubbins (a 1975 law

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Collins v. Superior Air-Ground Ambulance Service, Inc.

    338 Ill. App. 3d 812 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 29, 2003

    Superior also claimed that plaintiffs claim against it was barred based on the immunity provision set forth in the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems Act (EMS Act) (210 ILCS 50/3.150 (West 2000)). … The trial court never reached Superior’s immunity argument.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Stalzer v. Village of Matteson

    14 Ill. App. 3d 891 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 1, 1973

    Curtis, Jr., a duly qualified real estate appraiser and consultant. … Defendant called Herman Tieri, a licensed broker and realtor, also qualified as an appraiser.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Forbes v. Board of Education of the New Berlin Community Unit School District No. 16

    2021 IL App (4th) 190902-U · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 6, 2021

    ¶ 25 Here, while section 8-101 of the Tort Immunity Act establishes a one-year limitations period for actions filed against local public entities, it is clear the legislature, in section 13-202.2 of the Civil … App. 3d at 1002 (“In using this language, the legislature clearly intended section 13-202.2 of the [Civil] Code to control over other provisions of law, such as section 8-101 of the Tort Immunity Act, which would otherwise

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Mahan v. Marion Police Pension Board

    2023 IL App (5th) 210426 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Feb 3, 2023

    Mahan indicated that if he did not regain feeling in his hand, he did not intend to further qualify with a firearm each year. … Mixed questions of law and fact are reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. Wade, 226 Ill. 2d at 505.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.