Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.58s
2013 IL 112488 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2013
Hines v. … Cook County Board, 282 Ill. App. 3d 560 (1996).
Cited 20 timesPublishedM.U. v. Team Illinois Hockey Club, Inc.
2024 IL 128935 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2024
Id.; see Sangamon County Sheriff’s Department v. Illinois Human Rights Comm’n, 233 Ill. 2d 125, 140 (2009); Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University v. … See Welsh v.
Cited 5 timesPublished42 Ill. 2d 294 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1969
In United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 684 , 85 S. … People v. Brown, 16 Ill.2d 482 . We turn now to the final contention which pertains to Sawyer only.
Cited 20 timesPublished429 Ill. Dec. 291 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 22, 2019
PHL, Inc. v. Pullman Bank & Trust Co., 181 Ill.2d 575 (1998). … See Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners, 2012 IL 111928 , ¶ 21.
Cited 0 timesPublished62 Ill. 498 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872
Cleland, 33 Ill. 243 , and Cleland v. Fish, 43 id. 282, referred to by appellee’s counsel. It is qualified by Beach v. Sheldon, 14 Barb. 72 ; Laidlaw v. Organ, 2 Wharton, 178 ; Knitzing v. McElrath, 5 Penn. St., 467. … In Fox v. Mackeath, 2 Brown’s Ch.
Cited 21 timesPublished226 Ill. 270 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1907
The motion was based upon the affidavit of Harrigan, which states that ITarrigan had searched the records of the board of supervisors of Peoria county from the first Monday of December, 1900, to and including July 22, 190.1 … Marple v. Scott, 41 Ill. 50 ; Jones v. Neely, 72 id. 449; Imperial Fire Ins. Co. v. Shimer, 96 id. 580. Finding no reversible error in this record the judgment of the Appellate Court will be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Cited 5 timesPublished318 Ill. 585 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1925
(Bush v. Hamill, 273 Ill. 132 ; Mettler v. Warner, 243 id. 600; Armstrong v. Barber, 239 id. 389.) … (Dustin v. Brown, 297 Ill. 499 ; Hull v. Hull, 286 id. 75; Knight v. Pottgieser, 176 id. 368.) The mere fact that the distribution is postponed does not render the estate of the beneficiary contingent. (People v.
Cited 21 timesPublished381 Ill. 460 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1942
However, in the case of People v. Brown, 379 Ill. 262 , this court held that “the corpus delicti is not required to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence aliunde the confession or admissions of the accused. … In the case of People v.
Cited 15 timesPublished43 Ill. 2d 375 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1969
After I was struck by the board and the offender was going to strike me again. Q. Who was the one with the board ? A. John Ahrens. Q. Didn’t you testify against a Mr. Keating, that he had the board? A. No, sir. Q. … People v.
Cited 120 timesPublished241 Ill. 514 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1909
(Street v. French, 147 Ill. 342 ; Gage v. Cummings, 209 id. 120; Clark v. Jackson, 222 id. 13.) The case of Gibson v. … Brown, 214 Ill. 330 , differs in its facts from the case at bar and is not in conflict with the foregoing authorities.
Cited 15 timesPublishedBowie v. Evanston Community Consolidated School District No. 65
128 Ill. 2d 373 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1989
(Human Rights Authority of the State of Illinois Guardianship & Advocacy Comm’n v. Miller (1984), 124 Ill. App. 3d 701, 704 . See also Kryston v. … Board of Education, East Ramapo Central School District (1980), 77 A.D.2d 896, 896-97 , 430 N.Y.S.2d 688, 689 .
Cited 77 timesPublished213 Ill. 302 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1904
(People v. Wilkinson, supra; Glennon v. Britton, supra.) … Board of Supervisors of Vermilion County, 198 Ill. 205 , and Theurer v.
Cited 24 timesPublished256 Ill. 558 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1912
(Milne v. People, 224 Ill. 125 ; People v. McBride, 234 id. 146 .) … Dec. 95 ; State v. City of Portland, 74 Me. 268 ; 43 Am. Rep. 586 ; Commonwealth v. Bredin, 165 Pa. St. 224; State v. Barksdale, 24 Tenn. 154 ; Allen v. City of Decatur, 23 Ill. 332 ; Browning v.
Cited 10 timesPublished149 Ill. 575 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1894
On thus quoting Cox v. … Gardt v. Brown, 113 Ill. 475 ; Lintner v. Millikin, 47 id. 178; Fougner et al. v. First Nat. Bank, supra.
Cited 12 timesPublished108 Ill. 151 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1883
Work was commenced under this contract, and prosecuted until the I7tli of January next following, when the county board rescinded its action, taken before the making of the contract with Harms, whereby it had approved and … That it may be so concluded and estopped is settled by Sexton v. City of Chicago, 107 Ill. 323 , City of Chicago v. Chicago and Western Indiana R. R. Co. 105 id. 85, and Chicago v. McGraw, 75 id. 570.
Cited 38 timesPublished26 Ill. 2d 381 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1962
In Koser v. … See also the treatment of this problem in People v. Henderson, 378 Ill. 436, 446 ; People v. Brown, 379 Ill. 262, 267 .
Cited 15 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Nourie v. Peltier
265 Ill. 630 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1914
(Plummer v. Yost, 144 Ill. 68 .) … (Beverly v. Sabin, 20 Ill. 357 ; Heuser v. Harris, 42 id. 425 .) Women were not entitled to vote on the question of organizing a high school district, and their votes should not have been received and counted.
Cited 11 timesPublished52 Ill. 241 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1869
Bradshaw v. Newman, Breese, 133; Stacy v. Baker, 1 Scam. 417 ; Phinney v. Baldwin, 16 Ill. 108 , In the case of Adams v. … Sherman v. Gassett, 4 Gilm. 521 . The general rule has been recognized in the cases of Forsythe v. Baxter 2 Scam. 12 ; Holbrook v. Vibbard, ib. 465; Chenot v. Lefevre, 3 Gilm. 642 ; Strawbridge v.
Cited 7 timesPublished83 Ill. 2d 112 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1980
Ct. 62 , and Supreme Court Rule 413(a)(v) (73 Ill. 2d R. 413(a)(v)). … In People v.
Cited 107 timesPublished268 Ill. 537 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1915
Afterward it was settled by the decision in Jones v. … The argument is based on various provisions of the statutes relating to the duty of the county treasurer to collect and report to the county board moneys collected by him, under which it is contended that the county occupies
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna