Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

2,990 results

1.05s

  • East St. Louis Federation of Teachers, Local 1220 v. East St. Louis School District No. 189 Financial Oversight Panel

    178 Ill. 2d 399 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1997

    Section 1B — 20 clearly identifies the nature of the discipline and the parties to be disciplined. … We find no need to discuss any longer a clearly unsupported argument, and we reject it. See 134 Ill. 2d R. 341(e)(7).

    Cited 141 timesPublished
  • Doss v. Bunyan

    262 Ill. 101 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1914

    In order to constitute a dedication, at common law, of lands for a public street, it must be made to clearly and unequivocally appear that the land owner intended to donate his land to the public for a public street and that … the authorities as a public road, was claimed to be erroneous because it was not qualified by a statement that such use must be adverse, exclusive, continuous and under claim of right, but it was held that inasmuch as the

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security

    198 Ill. 2d 380 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 20, 2001

    rule of law as applied to the established facts is or is not violated.” … Thus, a driver’s “business” was not established “independently” of AFM.

    Cited 620 timesPublished
  • In re Commitment of Fields

    2014 IL 115542 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2014

    According to respondent, because he “was under the requisite age to qualify for a diagnosis of pedophilia” at the time of the 2000 offense, the State failed to establish that he has a mental disorder. … Unspoken but clearly implied here is that the dispositional hearing was already in progress.

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Illinois Central Railroad v. County of McLean

    17 Ill. 291 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1855

    Pennsylvania and Massachusetts hold railways exempt from taxation, upon the ground that they are public works, established by public authority, like canals, turnpikes and highways. Inhabitants of Worcester v. … The case before us is not an exemption or immunity from the payment of taxes.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Village of Winfield v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board

    176 Ill. 2d 54 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1997

    as the library establishment election. 75 ILCS 5/4 — 3 (West 1992). … The Act clearly contemplates that the library board will determine its own budget.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Inland Rubber Co. v. Industrial Commission

    309 Ill. 43 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1923

    This contention is clearly unsound. The dates of these occasional absences were not fixed by plaintiff in error. … There was clearly no “return” to employment as contemplated by the act. American Glyco Metal Co. v. Industrial Com. 306 Ill. 421 ; Swift & Co. v. Industrial Com. 299 id. 587.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • People v. Yates

    98 Ill. 2d 502 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1983

    Officer Herman Kluth, also qualified as an expert in fingerprint analysis, corroborated Officer Patterson’s findings. … Statements suggesting or inducing it to do so are clearly improper and prejudicial. People v. Black, 317 Ill. 603 .”

    Cited 158 timesPublished
  • Land Commissioners of Commons of Kaskaskia v. President & Trustees of Commons of Kaskaskia

    249 Ill. 578 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1911

    Clearly, the individual members of this community are not deprived of any property right by the act under consideration. … To establish a school and provide the necessary funds for its support is one thing; its management or conduct, when established and supported, another and quite different thing.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Spiegel's House Furnishing Co. v. Industrial Commission

    288 Ill. 422 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1919

    Industrial Board, supra, but we think that the above holdings in that case state the law as it should be, except so far as it is qualified by the above clause in quotation marks. … have furnished the sole evidence to establish liability.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Klafter v. State Board of Examiners

    259 Ill. 15 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1913

    Orderly proceedings according to established rules which do not violate fundamental right must be observed, but there is no vested right in any particular remedy or form of proceeding. … These words clearly imply that the license shall not be revoked for trivial causes.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Richards v. Board of Education of Township High School District No. 201

    21 Ill. 2d 104 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1960

    Clearly, the fact that plaintiff possesses the training which entitles him to a life certificate is irrelevant to the prerogative of the defendant to pay him in accordance with his value to the school system. … Here, the, definition of professional growth set forth in section 21 — 15, being a part of the Code and general in nature, forestalled the necessity of the legislature repeating itself in section 22 — 5 and establishes sufficient

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Wills

    71 Ill. 2d 138 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1978

    On May 16, 1974, Casper, under a grant of immunity, detailed what had happened for the grand jury. … and succeeded them. “ ‘A charge of perjury may not be sustained by the device of lifting a statement of the accused out of its immediate context *** thus giving it a meaning wholly different than that which its context clearly

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Stamos v. Public Building Commission

    40 Ill. 2d 164 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1968

    The General Assembly cannot properly determine the local governmental requirements of 102 counties, 102 county seats, and other qualifying municipalities in the State. … Consequently, the Board properly qualifies as a municipal corporation having taxing powers under section 18 of the Public Building Commission Act.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • The PEOPLE v. Sullivan

    46 Ill. 2d 399 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1970

    But the circumstances here do not reasonably establish intent to use the hunting knives against another. … He may not, in my opinion, continue, with immunity from further penalty, to do the very things which caused his arrest in the first place.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Scown v. Czarnecki

    264 Ill. 305 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1914

    Was it meant that only those who' are qualified to vote for so-called constitutional offices were to be thus protected? … In my opinion the legislature clearly exceeded it's authority in the passage of the act in question, and the decree of the superior court should be reversed.-

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • People v. Schwartz

    64 Ill. 2d 275 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1976

    The provision merely establishes that an attorney may not act as a paid intermediary or placement agent for a party desiring to buy or sell a child. … As such, the statute treats an attorney in the same manner as any other individual who does not qualify for the exemption contained in section 12 — 1.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Chicago Park District v. Lyons

    39 Ill. 2d 584 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 29, 1968

    And, if defendant’s actions are constitutionally immunized from proscription, other similar distributions will be similarly protected. … Under such conditions it seems to us clearly foreseeable that some pamphlets would be dislodged and blown to the ground.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Grennan v. Sheldon

    401 Ill. 351 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1948

    order, on motions previously filed by original petitioners, finding (1) that all petitions other than those of the original petitioners were not filed in apt time, (2) that none of them contained the required number of qualified … Clearly the act could not stand in the absence of those two paragraphs, which prescribe requirements for the establishment of organized hospital authorities.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Bolnick v. Industrial Commission

    81 Ill. 2d 22 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 22, 1980

    Prior decisions of this court have, however, adopted the “dual capacity” doctrine as to corporate executives and clearly establish that one who is sole stockholder, president and director of a corporation may still be considered … It is far more logical and consistent with the purpose of the Workmen’s Compensation Act to compute his compensation for the injury on the basis of the employment which qualified him for coverage under the Act, without which

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.