Case law

McCreery v. Bartholf

305 Ill. 325 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1922

(Storrs v. St. Luke's Hospital, 180 Ill. 368 ; Selden v. Illinois Trust and Savings Bank, 239 id. 67; Rework v. Dodd, 288 id. 80.) … (Brown v. Riggin, 94 Ill. 560 ; Riley v. Webb, 272 id. 537.)

People v. Forest Park Methodist Church

408 Ill. 431 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1951

People v. Anderson, 380 Ill. 158 . … In People v.

McDonald v. People ex rel. Hanberg

206 Ill. 624 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1903

entered, they have appealed, and have assigned as grounds for reversing the judgment of the county court the following: First, that the county court erred in not admitting in evidence the record of the first resolution of the board … The validity of the part of section 66 of the Improvement act hereinbefore set out was presented to us for consideration in Downey v.

Meridian Line Drainage District v. Wiss

258 Ill. 600 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1913

Appellants rely on Winkelmann v. Moredock and Ivy Landing Drainage District, 170 Ill. 37 , Ahrens v. Minnie Creek Drainage District, 170 id. 262, and Vandalia Drainage District v. Hutchins, 234 id. 31. … (State v. Board of Education, 68 N. J. L. 496; 53 Atl. Rep. 236 .) The per diem allowed drainage commissioners, attorney fees and court costs are within the meaning of “current expenses.”

People ex rel. Cooley v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad

242 Ill. 515 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1909

Louis Railway Co. v. … In Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. v.

Young v. Bennett

5 Scam. 43 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1842

Ev. 469. and note 1: Earl of Leicester v. Walton, 2 Campb. 251; Cor. Mansfield, Ch. J.-v. Moor, 1 M. and S. 284 ; King v. Perrot, cited in 3 Eng. Com. L. 115; Williams v. Callendar, Holt C. 307, cited in 3 Eng. Com. … L. 115; Mills et ux. v. Spencer et ux., Holt C. 533, cited in 3 Eng. Com. L. 177; Newsam v. Carr, 2 Stark. 69; 3 Eng. Com. L. 249; 1 Penn. 169 ; Cook v. Barkley, one judge dissenting; Calloway v.

Braden v. Much

403 Ill. 507 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 19, 1949

Quilici v. Village of Mt. Prospect, 399 Ill. 418 ; Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. City of Chicago, 402 Ill. 581 . … Avery v. Village of LaGrange, 381 Ill. 432 ; Burkholder v. City of Sterling, 381 Ill. 564 ; Zadworny v. City of Chicago, 380 Ill. 470 .

City of Gibson v. Murray

216 Ill. 589 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1905

(Town of Grayville v. Whitaker, 85 Ill. 439 ; City of Chicago v. Bixby, 84 id. 82; Village of Mansfield v. Moore, 124 id. 133). … In City of Champaign v.

Mitsuuchi v. City of Chicago

125 Ill. 2d 489 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1988

Board of Trustees (1964), 31 Ill. 2d 566, 574 ; Freberg v. Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Pension Fund (1970), 128 Ill. App. 2d 369 ). … (O’Brien v. Rautenbush (1956), 10 Ill. 2d 167 , overruled on other grounds, Rylander v. Chicago Short Line Ry. Co. (1959), 17 Ill. 2d 618 .)

Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. Morgan

72 Ill. 155 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1874

Second—The destruction, by a like cause, of a quantity of board and hedge fence on the farm of appellee. … This case is clearly within the principle of the cases of the Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Allen, 39 Ill. 205 , and The Toledo, Wabash and Western Railway Co. v. Hunter, 50 Ill. 325 .

The People v. Kriner

362 Ill. 292 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1935

(People v. Sarney, 351 Ill. 428, 432 .) … (People v. Kukulski, 358 Ill. 601, 610 ; People v. Nowicki, 330 id. 381.) The jury was warranted in disregarding the alibi evidence in this record and in finding the defendant guilty.

Fisher Body Division v. Industrial Commission

40 Ill. 2d 514 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1968

(Quarant v. Industrial Com., 38 Ill.2d 490 ; see Chmelik v. Vana, 31 Ill.2d 272, 277-278 .) … Mazursky v. Industrial Com., 364 Ill. 445 ; Board of Education v. Industrial Com., 321 Ill. 23 . In the case at bar the claimant relies upon the fact that the injuries were incurred upon the company’s parking lot.

City of Chicago v. Cameron

120 Ill. 447 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 12, 1887

This distinction is very clearly pointed out in Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 . And see Russell v. Place, id. 606; Riverside Co. v. Townsend, ante, p. 9. … The claim of an equitable estoppel in this case, which is urged against appellees, and the cases cited in support thereof, of Bradley v. Ballard, 55 Ill. 413 , Chicago Building Society v. Crowell, 65 id. 453 , West v.

Koebel v. Doyle

256 Ill. 610 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1912

(Brown v. Welch, 18 Ill. 343 ; Campbell v. Whitson, 68 id. 240; Roseman v. Miller, 84 id. 297; 20 Cyc. 763.)

Myers v. City of Elmhurst

12 Ill. 2d 537 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1958

(Krom v. City of Elmhurst, 8 Ill.2d 104 .) … (Krom v. City of Elmhurst, 8 Ill.2d 104 ; Chicago Title and Trust Co. v. Village of Franklin Park, 4 Ill.2d 304 ; Midland Electric Coal Corp. v. County of Knox, 1 Ill.2d 200 .)

People v. Fensky

297 Ill. 440 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1921

(Truitt v. People, 88 Ill. 518 ; Long v. People, 135 id. 435.) Counsel for the plaintiff in error, however, insists that the common law has been changed by the Statute of Amendments and Jeofails. … (People v. Town of Thornton, 186 Ill. 162 ; State Board of Health v. Ross, 191 id. 87.) The title of the act is, “An act to revise the law in relation to amendments and jeofails.”

People ex rel. Parmenter v. Fenton & Thomson Railroad

252 Ill. 372 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1911

Each town is under the cash system, and the certificates of the highway commissioners, consented to by the board of town auditors, each recited that-an additional levy of twenty-five cents on each $100 valuation was made … (People v. Kankakee and Southwestern Railroad Co. 237 Ill. 362 ; People v. Wabash Railroad Co. 248 id. 540.)

People ex rel. Yoder v. Commissioners of Highways

188 Ill. 150 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1900

(Hurd’s Stat. 1899, sec. 46, chap. 121, entitled “Roads and Bridges;” Ravatte v. Race, 152 Ill. 672 ; Chicago, Santa Fe and California Railway Co. v. Lorance, 180 id. 180.) … If a board of highway commissioners, .on the hearing provided for.by said sections 33 and 34 of said chapter 121, should refuse to grant the prayer of a petition for the establishment of a new road, it would become the duty

The PEOPLE v. Kees

32 Ill. 2d 299 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1965

Jackson, 23 Ill.2d 274 ; People v. Stacey, 25 Ill.2d 258 ; People v. Melquist, 26 Ill.2d 22 ; People v. Reader, 26 Ill.2d 210 ,) and which, in Gallegos v. … (See: People v. Agar, 253 N.Y.S. 2d 761 ; Browne v. State, 24 Wis.2d 491 , 131 N.W.2d 169 ; Pece v. Cox, 74 N.M. 591 , 396 P.2d 422 ; Davis v. State, 236 Md. 389 , 204 A. 2d 76 .)

Haywood v. Collins

60 Ill. 328 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1871

Kemp’s Lessee v. Kennedy, 5 Cranch, 173 ; McCormick v. Sullivant, 10 Wheat. 192 ; Foote v. Stevens, 17 Wend. 483 ; Hart v. Leixas, 21 ib. 40; The Chemung Bank v. Judson, 4 Seld. 254; Ruckman v. … Cowell, 1 Comst. 505; Brown v. Wood, 17 Mass. 67 ; Reynolds v. Stansbury, 20 Ohio, 344.