Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.82s
West Side Coal & Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission
291 Ill. 301 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1920
Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11 ; Central Garage v. Industrial Com. 286 id. 291; Rainford v. Chicago City Railway Co. 289 id. 427.
Cited 7 timesPublished4 Ill. 298 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1841
Browne, Justice, delivered the opinion of the (old) Court: The questions presented for the consideration of the Court in this case are, first, the kind of damages that may be set off in an action commenced before a justice … Upon the first point made, as to whether damages of the nature claimed can be the subject matter of a- setoff, the Court has only to refer to the case of Edwards et al. v. Todd, (1) as settling it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Evanston v. Create, Inc.
85 Ill. 2d 101 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1981
Village of Oak Park (1976), 62 Ill. 2d 523, 527 ; Paglini v. Police Board (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 233, 235 ; Mulligan v. Dunne (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 544, 550 ; Peters v. … In City of Chicago v. Pollution Control Board (1974), 59 Ill. 2d 484 , and County of Cook v.
Cited 72 timesPublishedRonan v. People ex rel. Shafter
193 Ill. 631 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1901
The first of these is, that the sidewalk was required to be constructed partly by special taxation and partly by special assessment, which, under the decision in Kuehner v. … The owners of more than one-half of the property abutting on the proposed sidewalk between Ninth and Tenth streets petitioned the board of local improvements of the city to build the sidewalk between said streets by special
Cited 0 timesPublished196 Ill. 444 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1902
It appears that, on October 25, 1892, at a meeting of the board of directors of the South Park Club Association, a resolution was passed by the board, authorizing the president of the association to execute and deliver the … (Schweer v. Schwabacher, 17 Ill. App. 78 ; Harts v. Wendell, 26 id. 274; Dalby v. Campbell, id. 502; Horner v. Boyden, 27 id. 573; Siegel v. Hanchett, 33 id. 634; 2 Sutherland on Damages,—2d ed.—sec. 505).
Cited 12 timesPublished287 Ill. 138 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1919
Gibson v. Brown, 214 Ill. 330 . The decree will be reversed and the-cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Toman v. Olympia Fields Country Club
374 Ill. 101 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1940
In People v. … (People v. Norton, 358 Ill. 272 .)
Cited 10 timesPublished273 Ill. 60 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1916
First Congregational Church v. Page, 257 Ill. 472 . … (North v. Graham, 235 Ill. 178 ; Dees v. Cheuvronts, 240 id. 486.) Non-compliance with a condition subsequent does not, of itself, determine the estate.
Cited 8 timesPublished223 Ill. 2d 109 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 19, 2006
It is well established, however, that a declaration of policy or a preamble is not a part of the act itself (Brown v. Kirk, 64 Ill. 2d 144, 152 (1976)) and has no substantive legal force (Lieber v. … Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University, 176 Ill. 2d 401, 414 (1997)). While it may be used as a tool of statutory construction (Atkins v.
Cited 238 timesPublished49 Ill. 494 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1869
Api’il 20, 1863, district six was organized by the election of a board of directors, of whom plaintiff was one, and on the same day they elected their president and clerk, who was directed to give public notice of a meeting … On the authority of the case of Bruffort v. Great Western R. R. Co., 25 Ill. 358 , district two was not responsible for the debts of district six, unless the obligation had been expressly created, which is not shown.
Cited 3 timesPublished69 Ill. 452 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1873
Bigelow on Estoppel, 468 ; Higgins v. Ferguson et at. 14 Ill. 269 ; Donaldson et al. v. Holmes, 23 id. 85 ; Schwartz et ux. v. Saunders, 46 id. 18. … It is shown, and nowhere contradicted, that while the work was being done, she and her husband were boarding only about one block from and in plain view of the house; that the house was being fitted up for a residence for
Cited 26 timesPublished230 Ill. 319 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1907
See, also, Eppstein v. Kuhn, 225 Ill. 115 ; Abeel v. Radcliff, 13 Johns. 297 ; 1 Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, (8th ed.) secs. 55, 56, 57; 4 Kent, 112, 114. … Louis Railroad Co. v. Wiggins Perry Co. 82 Ill. 230 , the leasing was for a definite term and after it expired the defendant held over, without, however, the consent of the plaintiff. In Brown v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedF. K. Ketler Co. v. Industrial Commission
392 Ill. 564 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1946
(Haiselden v. Industrial Board, 275 Ill. 114 ; Bushnell v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 262 ; Chicago Circular Advertising Service, Inc., v. Industrial Com. 332 Ill. 156 ; Lewis v. Industrial Com. 357 Ill. 309 .) … (O’Brien v. Chicago City Railway Co. 305 Ill. 244 ; Huntoon v. Pritchard, 371 Ill. 36 .)
Cited 7 timesPublished33 Ill. 433 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1864
The case in which the opinon was delivered was in name of John Doe ex dem. of Moore and others, heirs-at-law of George Lunceford, v. Hill, and reported in Breese’s Eeports, 304, 2d ed. … We agree with-the court that congress had no power to organize, years after those titles and possessions were confirmed by the governor, a board of revision to nullify them.
Cited 2 timesPublishedConnor Co. v. Industrial Commission
374 Ill. 105 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1940
The court held the injury arose out of the employment, and affirmed an award of the State Industrial Board. In Boulanger v. First Nat. Stores, 163 Atl. … In Ridenour v. Lewis, 238 N.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWomen's Catholic Order of Foresters v. Heffernan
283 Ill. 429 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1918
Murphy v. Nowak, supra. … In Ballou v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedErnhart v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
405 Ill. 577 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1950
Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. v. Industrial Com. 290 Ill. 599 ; Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Co. v. Industrial Board, 273 Ill. 528 . … (Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co. v. Interstate Commerce Com. 221 U.S. 612 , 55 L. ed. 878; T. & P. Ry Co. v. Rigsby, 241 U.S. 33 , 60 L. ed. 874; National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Seiler v. Calloway
344 Ill. 488 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1931
(Trumbo v. People, 75 Ill. 561 ; Blake v. People, 109 id. 504; People v. Dyer, 205 id. 575 ; People v. Pederson, 220 id. 554; People v. Bowman, 247 id. 276; People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 267 id. 469.) … (People v. York, 247 Ill. 591 .) That case was an application by a county collector for judgment for a special assessment. Board of Education v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGeneral Time Corp. v. Industrial Commission
60 Ill. 2d 32 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1975
(Brown v. Industrial Com., 57 Ill.2d 313, 316 ; Hannibal, Inc. v. Industrial Com., 38 Ill.2d 473, 475 .) But he need not prove that the employment was the sole cause of his injury or even the principal cause. … This court said in Plano Foundry Co. v.
Cited 1 timesPublished363 Ill. 258 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1936
(Hankins v. Calloway, 88 Ill. 155 .) … Joint action of the State Highway Commission and the board of county commissioners or supervisors is. required. (Ill.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna