Case law

People v. Rothermel

88 Ill. 2d 541 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1982

See People v. Johnson (1960), 20 Ill. 2d 336 ; People v. Viar (1971), 131 Ill. App. 2d 983 ; People v. Collins (1970), 123 Ill. App. 2d 138 ; People v. Whittaker (1970), 45 Ill. 2d 491 ; People v. … Brown, Personal Property sec. 1.5 (3d ed. 1975).)

The People v. C., C., C. St. L. Ry. Co.

365 Ill. 443 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1937

To warrant the clerk in extending the tax to include this deficiency there should have been certified to him a supplemental levy made by the board of supervisors. (People v. Sandberg Co. supra.) … In People v.

People ex rel. Magee v. McAnally

221 Ill. 66 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1906

virtue of a writ of execution issued by a justice of the peace upon a judgment against relator for $100 and costs of suit, in an action of debt at the suit of the People of the State of Illinois, for the use of the State Board … The law on that subject was settled in this State by the decision in the case of Hammond v.

Root v. Sinnock

120 Ill. 350 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1887

Culver v. Third Nat. Bank of Chicago, 64 Ill. 528 ; Tibballs et al. v. Libby, 87 id. 142; Bromley v. Goodwin, 95 id. 118; Wincock v. Turpin, 96 id. 141; Harper v. Union Manf. Co. 100 id. 225; Eames et al. v. … (Wheelock v. Kost, 77 Ill. 298 .) As was said in Brown v.

Wexler v. Wirtz Corp.

Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 1, 2004

Chicago Teachers Union, Local 1 v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago , 189 Ill. 2d 200, 206 (2000). Where a plaintiff has no standing, the proceedings must be dismissed. … Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp ., 201 Ill. 2d 403, 411 (2002); see Kankakee County Board of Review v. Property Tax Appeal Board , 316 Ill. App. 3d 148, 151 (2000).

Dunnovan v. Green

57 Ill. 63 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1870

In the case of The People ex rel. v. … The People ex rel. v. The Mayor of Chicago, 51 Ill. 17 ; Harward v. Lexee & Drainage Co. ib. 130 and other subsequent cases.

Saldana v. Industrial Commission

53 Ill. 2d 222 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1972

(Brown v. Industrial Com., 51 Ill.2d 291 ; McIntire v. Industrial Com., 49 Ill.2d 239 ; Beck v. Industrial Com., 32 Ill.2d 148 ; see also Bray v. Industrial Com., 50 Ill.2d 262 ; Ford Motor Co. v. … Industrial Com., 50 Ill.2d 267 ; General Carbon Co. v. Industrial Com., 50 Ill.2d 273 .)

Edgerton v. Young

43 Ill. 464 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1867

Campbell v. Carter, 14 Ill. 289 ; Jarvis v. Frink, 14 id. 398 ; Brown v. Blydenburg, 3 Seld. 141; Gillett v. Campbell, 1 Denio, 520 .

Nilson Bros. v. Kahn

314 Ill. 275 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1924

(Clayton v. Feig, 179 Ill. 534 ;. Ely v. Brown, 183 id. 575 ; Westgate v. Ohlmacher, 251 id. 538 .) … (Hack v. Flentye, 80 Ill. 258 .)

Walworth Investments-LG, LLC v. Mu Sigma, Inc.

465 Ill. Dec. 638 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2022

Ch. 2010) (“[O]nce the QuadraMed Board honored the special contractual rights of the preferred, it was entitled to favor the interests of the common stockholders.”); Fletcher International, Ltd. v. … See Nemec v.

Glos v. Ptacek

226 Ill. 188 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1907

Proof of the possession by Albert Ptacek, with claim of ownership, constituted prima facie proof of .title in fee in him, (Barger v. Hobbs, 67 Ill. 592 ; Harland v. … (Gage v. Goudy, 141 Ill. 215 , and cases there cited.)

Springer v. Walters

139 Ill. 419 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1891

(City of Chicago v. The U. B. Association, 102 Ill. 379 ; McDonald v. English, 85 id. 232.) … High on Injunctions, (1st ed.) see. 486, and authorities there cited; Oswald v. Wolfe, 129 Ill. 200 ; Thornton v. Roll, 118 id. 350 .

Litchfield & Madison Railway Co. v. Industrial Commission

345 Ill. 260 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1931

Industrial Board, 277 Ill. 96 ; Dragovich v. Iroquois Iron Co. 269 id. 478.) … Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11 . The circuit court erred in setting aside the award entered by the Industrial Commission.

Sperling v. Industrial Commission

129 Ill. 2d 416 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 17, 1989

Industrial Comm’n (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 79 , 275 N.E.2d 465 ; Lewis v. Industrial Comm’n (1967), 38 Ill. 2d 461 , 231 N.E.2d 593 ; Byrd v. Industrial Comm’n (1965), 33 Ill. 2d 115 , 210 N.E.2d 535 ; City of Chicago v. … (Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control Board (1986), 115 Ill. 2d 65, 70-71 ; Jackson v. Board of Review (1985), 105 Ill. 2d 501, 513 ; Murdy v. Edgar (1984), 103 Ill. 2d 384, 391 .)

Brent v. Kimball

60 Ill. 211 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1871

Hinckley v. Emerson, 4 Cow. 351 , and cases there cited. … J., in Ashby v. White, 2 Ld. Raymond, 955, are very pertinent to this question.

West Side Coal & Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission

291 Ill. 301 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1920

Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11 ; Central Garage v. Industrial Com. 286 id. 291; Rainford v. Chicago City Railway Co. 289 id. 427.

People Ex Rel. Siegal v. Rogers

397 Ill. 187 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 22, 1947

In Moon v. … Jacobs v.

People v. Smith

Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2008

People v. Gargani, 371 Ill. App. 3d 729, 731 (2007). … Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass’n v. Shapo, 357 Ill. App. 3d 122, 148 (2005); Citizens Against Regional Landfill v. Pollution Control Board, 255 Ill. App. 3d 903, 909 (1994).

Schooner Constitution v. Woodworth

2 Ill. 511 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1838

Lockwood, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court: This was an attachment issued by a justice of the peace, in favour of Woodworth, against the schooner Constitution, for the services of Wdodworth on board the schooner … See note to Waldo et al. v. Averett, Ante 487. R. L. 95; Gale’s Stat. 73. R. L. 395; Gale's Stat. 409.

North Chicago Street Railroad v. Cossar

203 Ill. 608 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1903

But they do not so stop, unless some passenger is going to alight, or board the car. The conductor knows, or is supposed to know, whether anyone is going to alight or board the car. … It is the conductor’s duty to stop the car, in orderThat every person, who desires to alight or board the car, may do so.