Case law

S. Buchsbaum & Co. v. Gordon

389 Ill. 493 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1945

(Ketcham v. Board of Education, 324 Ill. 314 ; People v. Day, 321 Ill. 552 ; Village of Glencoe v. Hurford, 317 Ill. 203 .) … In Stewart v.

People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Sheridan Trust & Savings Bank

358 Ill. 290 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1934

(McQueen v. Randall, 353 Ill. 231 ; Kamfner v. Auburn Park Savings Bank, 344 id. 200.) … (Marine Bank v. Fulton County Bank, 69 U. S. 255 , 17 L. ed. 785; Marine Bank v. Rushmore, 28 Ill. 463 ; Tinkham & Co. v. Heyworth, 31 id. 519 .)

Porter v. People ex rel. Greeley

182 Ill. 516 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1899

We said in People ex rel. v. … People ex rel. v. North Chicago Railway Co. supra.

Gadlin v. Auditor of Public Accounts

414 Ill. 89 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1953

(Scofield v. Board of Education, 411 Ill. 11 .) In 1951 the number of licensed exchanges in Illinois was 597, of which 584 were located in Cook County. … (Department of Finance v. Gandolfi, 375 Ill. 237 ; People ex rel. Rice v. Wilson Oil Co. 364 Ill. 406 ; People ex rel. Mosco v. Service Recognition Board, 403 Ill. 442 .)

Sturges' Sons v. Metropolitan National Bank of New York ex rel. Field

49 Ill. 220 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1868

Avery, 15 ib. 299, referring, at page 308, to Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 354 . A strong case upon the question of notice, entirely in conformity with the case in 3 Gilman, supra, is found in 5 Sanford’s N. … Lovejoy, 29 Ill. 47 , and is consonant with Gill v. Corbitt, supra, and the same is the doctrine of most of the American courts. Ayer v. Hutchins, 4 Mass. 470 ; Wiggin v. Bush, 12 Johns. (N. Y.) 305; Brown v.

In Re DD

212 Ill. 2d 410 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 23, 2004

The School Code provides that the State Board of Education (the Board) must address the requirements of the IDEA when promulgating rules under the Code. 105 ILCS 5/14-3.01 (West 1998). … In an analogous case, Dale M. v.

In re Contested Election

47 Ill. 2d 81 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1970

In Bogert v. … In Lance v. Board of Education,-W.

Merwin v. City of Chicago

45 Ill. 133 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1867

Mayor of Baltimore v. Root, 8 Md. 102 ; Chialey v. Brewer, 7 Mass. 260 ; Bulkey v. Eckert, 3 Barr. 368; Burnham v. City, eta., 15 Wis. 194 ; McDougall v. Board, etc., 4 Minn. 184 ; Mayor v. … Rowland, 26 Ala. 503 ; Bank v. Dibrell, 3 Sneed, 382 ; Hawthon v. St. Louis, 11 Mo. 59 . The Circuit Court did not err in discharging the city without. answer. Judgment affirmed.

President & Trustees of Mount Sterling v. Givens

17 Ill. 255 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1855

Dale et al. v. Denison, 4 Wend. R. 558. … Park, id. 532; Whiteside et al. v. Divers, 4 Scam. R. 336; Parrot v. Vaughn, 2 Gil. R. 132. In County of Sangamon v. Brown et al., 13 Ill.

Talsky v. Department of Registration & Education

68 Ill. 2d 579 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1977

In Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners (1935), 294 U.S. 608 , 79 L. Ed. 1086 , 55 S. … Ct. 2553 , and was subsequently terminated in Bigelow v. Virginia (1975), 421 U.S. 809 , 44 L. Ed. 2d 600 , 95 S. Ct. 2222 , Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.

Loy v. Steamboat F. X. Aubury

28 Ill. 412 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1862

In the case of the Canalboat Huron v. … Co. v. Dalby, 19 Ill. 363 . Fortified by this statute, the case of the plaintiff is beyond controversy.

People Ex Rel. Cromer v. Village of Maywood

381 Ill. 337 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1942

Brown, 17 Ill. 191 . … Akin v. Matteson, 17 Ill. 167 .)

Elvin v. Wuchetich

326 Ill. 285 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1927

(Brinkley v. Going, Breese, 366; Parks v. Brown, 16 Ill. 454 .) The same presumption does not prevail in favor of a stranger to the instrument. … Collins v. Ogden, The plaintiff was not shown ever to have been in possession of the notes.

Dawson Soap Co. v. City of Chicago

234 Ill. 314 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1908

(People v. Knopf, 183 Ill. 410 ; L'Hlote v. Village of Milford, 212 id. 418 ; Douglas v. People, supra; Potwin v. Johnson, supra; Reynolds v. Town of Foster, supra; People v. Board of Supervisors, supra.) … In State v.

People Ex Rel. Naftzger v. Arnett

317 Ill. 425 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1925

People v. Fling, 303 Ill. 215 ; People v. Glasgow, supra; People v. Ritscher, 301 Ill. 40 ; People v. Cowen, 283 id. 308. … People v. Burrell, 308 Ill. 600 ; People v, Jones, 308 id. 246; People v. Burson, 307 id. 533; People v. Stewart, 306 id. 470.

North Chicago Street Railroad v. Dudgeon

184 Ill. 477 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1900

—See Sadler v. Henlock, 4 El. & B. 57.” In Woodman v. … , and the foot-board rolled me over till the car got clear over me.”

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission

320 Ill. 544 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1926

Tribune Co. v. Industrial Com. 290 Ill. 402 . … International Coal Co. v. Industrial Com. supra; Chicago Railways Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 Ill. 112 ; Wabash Railway Co. v. Industrial Com. supra; Tribune Co. v. Industrial Com. supra.

Harrison v. People ex rel. Raben

222 Ill. 150 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1906

(Zanone v. Mound City, 103 Ill. 552 .) … (Leighton v. Maurey, 76 Va. 865 ; People v. Board of Excise, 61 N. Y. Sup. 798; Sherlock v. Stuart, 96 Mich. 193 ; Attorney General v. Justices, 27 N. C. 315 ; Muller v. Commissioners, 89 id. 17; Hillsboro v.

Best v. Taylor MacHine Works

179 Ill. 2d 367 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1997

See, e.g., Brown’s Furniture, Inc. v. Wagner, 171 Ill. 2d 410 (1996) (upholding constitutionality of a use tax); Cutinello v. … See, e.g., Lee v. Retirement Board of the Policeman’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 31 Ill. 2d 252 (1964).

Washington Park Club v. City of Chicago

219 Ill. 323 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1905

Second—It is next urged there was a variance between the first resolution of the board of local improvements and the ordinance in the description of the improvement. … Vandersyde v. People, 195 Ill. 200 ; City of Chicago v. Corcoran, 196 id. 146; Duane v. City of Chicago, 198 id. 471; Walker v. City of Chicago, 202 id. 531. Fourth—The appellants called John A.