Case law

The People v. B. O.R.R. Co.

385 Ill. 86 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1943

Larson v. Thompson , 377 Ill. 104 ; Austin v. Healey , 376 Ill. 633 ; and the so-called Curative Act of December 10, 1935. … People v. Thompson , 377 Ill. 104 ; People ex rel. Morse v. Orvis , 358 Ill. 408 ; People ex rel. Leaf v. Orvis , 374 Ill. 536 .

Neish v. Gannon

198 Ill. 219 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1902

(Miller v. Miller, 16 Ill. 296 ; Collar v. Patterson, 137 id. 403 ; Switzer v. Kee, 146 id. 577; Heffron v. Brown, 155 id. 322; Sherman v. Whiteside, 190 id. 576.) In Miller v. … And in Sherman v.

Burris v. White

232 Ill. 2d 1 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 9, 2009

Noyola v. Board of Education, 179 Ill. 2d 121, 133 (1997), quoting Madden v. Cronson, 114 Ill. 2d 504, 514 (1986). … Bonaguro v. County Officers Electoral Board, 158 Ill. 2d 391, 399 (1994). We think this opinion, grounded as it is on precedent from our own court, is entitled to such weight and accurately characterizes Illinois law.

Cairo & St. Louis Railroad v. Holbrook

92 Ill. 297 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1879

In Tallman v. … In Brown v.

Donaldson v. Holmes

23 Ill. 85 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1859

In Stiegleman et al. v. McBride, 17 Ill. … Wendall v. Rensselaer, 1 Johns. Ch. 344 ; Stores v. Barker, 6 Johns. Ch. 166 . We think the decree of the Circuit Court was right, and' accordingly affirm it. Decree affirmed.

Heineke v. Chicago Railways Co.

279 Ill. 210 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1917

Chicago City Railway Co. v. Morse, 197 Ill. 327 ; West Chicago Street Railroad Co. v. Nash, 166 id. 528. … (Schlauder v. Chicago and Southern Traction Co. 253 Ill. 154 ; City of Chicago v. Didier, 227 id. 571.) Dr.

Voss v. Chicago Park District

392 Ill. 429 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1946

The case of Board of Supervisors v. Mississippi and Wabash Railroad Co. 21 Ill. 338 , involved a statute authorizing cities and counties to subscribe stock to railroad companies. … The case of O'Connor v. High School Board of Education, 288 Ill. 240 , involved sections of the School Law.

The People v. Skally

342 Ill. 450 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1930

People v. Adams, 289 Ill. 339 . … People v. Knox, supra; People v. Burke, 313 Ill. 576 ; People v. Burke, 322 id. 271. The judgment of the criminal court of Cook county is therefore affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Mayfield v. Alton Railway, Gas & Electric Co.

198 Ill. 528 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1902

In Mansfield, Coldwater and Lake Michigan Railroad Co. v. … In Nugent v.

Continental Investment & Loan Society v. People ex rel. Gore

167 Ill. 195 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1897

This same objection was made in Broad-well v. Inter-Ocean Ass. supra. … (Broadwell v. Inter-Ocean Ass. supra).

People Ex Rel. Toman v. 110 South Dearborn Street Building Corp.

372 Ill. 459 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1939

Thus in People v. Baltimore and Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. supra, the county board made a levy of $15,000 for highway purposes. … So, in People v.

Teal v. Teal

324 Ill. 207 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1926

Berg v. Berg, 223 Ill. 209 ; Lewis v. Rose, 82 id. 574; Becker v. Becker, 79 id. 532; Thatcher v. Thatcher, 17 id. 66; Lenning v. Lenning, 176 id. 180. … (Farnham v. Farnham, 73 Ill. 497 ; Sharp v. Sharp, 116 id. 509 ; Brown v. Brown, 265 id. 546 .)

People ex rel. Cline v. Illinois Central Railroad

267 Ill. 168 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1915

The reasons urged for a reversal of the judgment are, (1) that the description of the property is too indefinite and uncertain to identify and locate the same; and (2) that the county board has no power to levy a tax by general … Each of these questions was considered in People v. Wabash Railroad Co. (ante, p. 30,) and what is there said is decisive of this" case. Eor the reasons there "given the judgment of the county court will be affirmed.

Peo. Ex Rel. Chi. & NW Ry. v. Hulman

31 Ill. 2d 166 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 1964

. *167 MAYER, FRIEDLICH, SPIESS, TIERNEY, BROWN & PLATT, of Chicago (SHERWOOD K. PLATT, ALFRED M. ROGERS, JR., and ARTHUR S. ROLLIN, of counsel,) for petitioner. WILLIAM G. … United Motor Coach Co. v. Carpentier, 17 Ill.2d 303, 306 , and Pre-Fab Transit Co. v.

Walker v. Chasteen

2025 IL 130288 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2025

Madigan, 2018 IL 122265, ¶ 9; Leetaru v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, 2015 IL 117485, ¶ 41. … In Ellis v.

Schwartz v. Ritter

186 Ill. 209 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1900

Carter v. Penn, 99 Ill. 390 ; Bangs v. Brown, 110 id. 96. Several objections are made to the decree on the ground that it does not correspond with the bill. … (Culver v. Third Nat. Bank of Chicago, 64 Ill. 528 ; Devine v. Commissioners of Cook County, 84 id. 590 .)

Ropacki v. Ropacki

341 Ill. 301 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1930

Appellant collected the rents from the premises and John paid board to her at the rate of $30 per month. … He had been paying $30 per month board and he directed his wife to purchase the groceries.

Kingman v. Higgins

100 Ill. 319 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1881

In the case of Bruner v. … In the cases of Wright v. Dunning, 46 Ill. 271 , Buck v. Conlogue, 49 id. 391 , Clubb v. Wise, 64 id. 157, Shepard v. Brewer, 65 id. 385, and Brown v.

People v. O'Hair

128 Ill. 20 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1889

Fietsam v. Hay et al. 122 Ill. 293 ; Coal and Mining Co. v. Edwards et al. 103 id. 472; 2 Blackstone’s Com. p. 37; Angelí & Ames on Corp. see. 4. … Chesshire et al. v. The People ex rel. 116 Ill. 493 ; The People v. Board of Education, 101 id. 308.

Chicago, Wilmington & Franklin Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

329 Ill. 494 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1928

Her husband died in December, 1918, and in 1921 she left the farm and went to work in the State hospital at Anna, Illinois, where she received $45 a month and her room and board. … (Bauer & Black v. Industrial Com. 322 Ill. 165 .) Partial dependency may exist though the evidence shows the claimant could have subsisted without the contributions of the deceased employee, (Pope v.