Case law

People Ex Rel. Scott v. Grivetti

50 Ill. 2d 156 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1972

While we recognize that under less extraordinary circumstances the rule followed in cases such as Engle v. Kerner, 32 Ill.2d 212 , People ex rel. Chillicothe Twp. v. Board of Review, 19 Ill. 2d 424 , and Leach v. … Scott v. Kerner, 32 Ill.2d 539 ; People ex rel. Engle v.

People ex rel. Gifford v. Doe

256 Ill. 467 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1912

(People v. Cairo, Vincennes and Chicago Railway Co. ante p. 286; People v. Cleveland, Cincinnati and Chicago Railway Co. ante, p. 423.) … While the board of town auditors and the assessor must exercise their judgment in determining the necessity of the additional tax and the validity of the reason therefor, their decision is final.

Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad v. Industrial Commission

366 Ill. 223 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1937

(Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Industrial Board, 284 Ill. 267 .) … Industrial Board, 273 Ill. 528 ; Dickinson v. Industrial Board, 280 id. 342.)

Brockway v. McClun

243 Ill. 196 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1909

Brown v. Miner, 128 Ill. 148 . The decree was for $4344.73. It is insisted that it includes $1.20 too much interest. The amount is too small to require our consideration. The decree is affirmed. „ ¿r , Decree affirmed.

Girhard v. Yost

344 Ill. 483 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1931

In Daugherty v. Carnine, 261 Ill. 366 , Farrell v. Heiberg, 262 id. 407 , Clarke v. Bettenhausen, 296 id. 373 , Kelly v. … In Farrell v.

York Community High School District No. 88 v. Wagemann

375 Ill. 193 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1940

(People v. Brown, 306 Ill. 245 ; People v. City of Chicago, 152 id. 546.)

Carroll v. Houston

341 Ill. 531 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1930

Hahnemann Hospital v. Industrial Board , 282 Ill. 316 . In Funkhouser v. … Burdette , 285 Ill. 48 ; Schultheis v. City of Chicago , 240 id. 167; Clark v. City of Chicago , 233 id. 113; Blake v. Lindblom , 225 id. 555; City of Chicago v. Condell , 224 id. 595.) In People v.

People ex rel. McCallister v. Wabash Railroad

282 Ill. 218 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1917

(People v. Huey, 277 Ill. 561 ; People v. Campbell, 278 id. 56.) … Louis Railway Co. v. People, supra.

Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Village of Wilmette

27 Ill. 2d 116 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1963

Dalkoff v. City of Rock Island, 17 Ill.2d 342 ; Langguth v. Village of Mount Prospect, 5 Ill.2d 49 ; Bullock v. City of Evanston, 5 Ill.2d 22 . … Bohan v. Village of Riverside, 9 Ill.2d 561 ; Stratford Aire Ass’n v. Hibser, 26 Ill.

The People v. Skally

342 Ill. 450 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1930

People v. Adams, 289 Ill. 339 . … People v. Knox, supra; People v. Burke, 313 Ill. 576 ; People v. Burke, 322 id. 271. The judgment of the criminal court of Cook county is therefore affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

People v. Walczniak

273 Ill. 76 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1916

Plaintiff in error and five other men boarded at the house of the child’s parents. … (Mash v. People, 220 Ill. 86 ; Fitzsimons & Connell Co. v. Braun & Fitts, 199 id. 390.) At all events, we would not be willing to reverse this judgment because of the admission of the testimony complained of. People v.

Benton Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

301 Ill. 396 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1922

While the finding of the Industrial Commission must be based upon a legitimate conclusion from the facts proved by competent evidence, (Carson-Payson Co. v. … Peoria Railway Terminal Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 352 ; Squire-Dingee Co. v. Industrial Board, 281 id. 359 .

State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Evansville Telephone Co. v. Okaw Valley Mutual Telephone Ass'n

282 Ill. 336 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1918

(Public Utilities Com. v. Bethany Mutual Telephone Ass’ n, supra.) … We do not regard the case of Terminal Taxi-cab Co. v. Public Utilities Com. 241 U. S. 252 , as announcing any doctrine contrary to the holding of this court in Public Utilities Com. v.

People v. Palmer

162 Ill. 2d 465 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1994

In People v. Brown (1986), 177 Cal. App. 3d 537, 549 , 223 Cal. … Defendant cites one other case, People v. Brown (1986), 177 Cal. App. 3d 537 , 223 Cal. Rptr. 66 , which is inapposite, but for a different reason.

Phelps v. Smith

15 Ill. 572 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1854

In the case of Delauney v. … We think the court erred in instructing the jury, that if “ Morehouse, as the administrator of the said Guyard, claimed the said lots before the said board of commissioners for the estate of the said Guyard alone, and not

Steffens v. Chase

165 Ill. 542 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1896

Healy and others, members of the board of county commissioners of said county, are defendants. … The case is governed by the decision of this court in the cause of People ex rel. v. Chase, (ante, p. 527,) in which the statute in question is held to be unconstitutional and void.

People v. Brand

415 Ill. 329 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 1953

These statements were denied by the testimony of Brand, Brown and Lauren. Plans were shown to the Bomars and a few minor changes agreed upon. … People v. Bertsche, 265 Ill. 272 ; Morton v. People, 47 Ill. 468 ; Maxwell v. People, 158 Ill. 248 .

People v. Bey

51 Ill. 2d 262 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1972

Citing Stovall v. … People v. Newell, 48 Ill.2d 382 .

Little v. Eaton

267 Ill. 623 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1915

(Walker v. Walker, 42 Ill. 311 ; Oliver v. Oliver, 149 id. 542; Rodemeier v. Brown, 169 id. 347; Riegel v. Riegel, 243 id. 626; Hoyt v. Northup, 256 id. 604.) … (Baker v. Hall, 214 Ill. 364 .)

Michelson v. Industrial Commission

375 Ill. 462 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1941

Hartford Accident Co. v. Industrial Com. 320 Ill. 544 ; Tribune Co. v. Industrial Com. 290 id. 402; Chicago Railways Co. v. Industrial Board, 276 id. 112. … In Board of Education v. Industrial Com. 368 Ill. 564 , a compensation agreement waiving right of review was approved by the commission. The settlement agreement was accompanied by a petition for lump sum settlement.