Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

10,000+ results

1.33s

  • Matthews v. Board of Commissioners

    87 Ill. 590 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1877

    Thus viewed, the action of the board of commissioners on the 18th of August, 1873, was not an absolute, final acceptance of appellants’ proposition of sale, but it was an acceptance in view of the board of commissioners’ … In accordance with the rule of the board, on the second business day after the 18th of August, the board reconsidered their action had on the last named day in relation to the location of the hospital, and recommitted to

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sperling v. County Officers Electoral Board

    57 Ill. 2d 81 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1974

    (Kusper v. Pontikes,---U.S.---, at---, 38 L. Ed. 2d 260, at 267 , 94 S. Ct. 303, at 308 .) … Similarly, the Supreme Court, in Lippitt v. Cipollone, 404 U.S. 1032 , 30 L. Ed. 2d 725 , 92 S.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Newell

    81 Ill. 387 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1876

    Justice Sheldon delivered the opinion of the Court: This was an action upon the common count for goods sold and delivered, brought against the Board of Supervisors of Macon county, and is founded upon certain written orders … instances the supplies were properly enough furnished, under the 4th section of the act, which, in the case of a person, not coming within the definition of a pauper, falling sick, without having money or property to pay his board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. Bruner

    168 Ill. 49 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1897

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Murray v. Board of Supervisors

    81 Ill. 597 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1876

    He presented an account to the board, charging the county for such services, and payment was refused. … The county board, in the opinion of the majority of the court, had complete control of this subject, and. the superintendent could not act for the county in this regard, without the sanction of the county board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fitzsimmons v. Board of Education

    322 Ill. 372 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Calhoun

    2 Ill. 521 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1838

    Smith, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court: The question presented for consideration in this case, involves the regular execution of the powers of the Board of Canal Commissioners, relative to the sale of lots in … The first and third set forth a public sale of a lot in the town of Chicago, to the defendant, for $20,000 as the highest bidder, at the sale made by an auctioneer, as the agent of the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Speck v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    89 Ill. 2d 482 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1982

    In 222 East Chestnut Street Corp. v. Board of Appeals (1956), 10 Ill. 2d 130, 135 , cert. denied (1957), 353 U.S. 984 , 1 L. Ed. 2d 1143 , 77 S. Ct. 1284 , this court stated, quoting from Winston v. … Zoning Board of Review (1971), 108 R.I. 349 , 275 A.2d 646 ; A. Di Cilio & Sons, Inc. v. Chester Zoning Board of Appeals (1952), 158 Ohio St. 302 , 109 N.E.2d 8 .

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Crusius v. Illinois Gaming Board

    Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 22, 2005

    See Emerald Casino, Inc. v. Illinois Gaming Board , 346 Ill. App. 3d 18 (2003). The action was commenced in May 2001. … The Board in Emerald Casino filed a petition for leave to appeal, which was denied. Emerald Casino, Inc. v. Illinois Gaming Board , 209 Ill. 2d 579 (table).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thies v. State Board of Elections

    124 Ill. 2d 317 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1988

    a Brown County man. … See Coalition for Political Honesty v. State Board of Elections (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 453, 464 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Moran v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    11 Ill. 2d 374 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 23, 1957

    (People v. Day, 313 Ill. 531, 533 .) … (Hawthorne Kennel Club v. Swanson, 339 Ill. 220 ; Jenisek v. Riggs, 381 Ill. 290 ; People v. Brickey, 396 Ill. 140 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cassady v. Board of Trustees

    93 Ill. 394 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners v. Harlev

    174 Ill. 412 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1898

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Clement v. Board of Trustees

    84 Ill. 311 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1876

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Henneberry

    41 Ill. 182 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1866

    Justice Breese : This case is in all respects similar to the case of the Board of Supervisors of Livingston county against William Henneberry, ante, and must be decided in the same way.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Bolton

    104 Ill. 220 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1882

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Trade v. Buckingham

    65 Ill. 72 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

    From this decree the board of trade have appealed, and ask a reversal of the decree. … He says he declined to act on 'the committee appointed by the board of trade, lest he might compromise his interests.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Faherty v. Board of Election Commissioners

    5 Ill. 2d 519 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1955

    On January 11, 1955, Roger Flaherty filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County against the Board of Election Commissioners of the city of Chicago and its members. … Upon the authority of Progressive Party v. Flynn, 400 Ill. 102 , we determined that a franchise was involved and advanced the case for argument on February 7, 1955.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hyde Park Thomson-Houston Light Co. v. Brown

    172 Ill. 329 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1898

    (Ingals v. Plamondon, 75 Ill. 118 ; Morrison v. King, 62 id. 30.) An easement which is not apparent, of which the grantor has not made use and of which he has no information, does not pass by an implication. (Ingals v. … Harlow v. Whitcher, 136 Mass. 553 -554. “The case at bar is essentially variant from Smith v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Boger

    291 Ill. 191 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1919

    (McClellan v. Board of Review, 200 Ill. 116 .) … (People v. Sellars, 179 Ill. 170 ; Stevens v. Henry County, 218 id. 468; People v. Webb, 256 id. 364; People v. National Box Co. 248 id. 141.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.