Case law

City of Chicago v. Union Building Ass'n

102 Ill. 379 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1882

The removal of the place of business of the Board of Trade will, doubtless, diminish the number of those desiring to become tenants of appellee; but it is not insisted that appellee has any legal right to control the movements … Chamberlain v. West End R. R. Co. 2 Best & Smith, 605, 110 E. C. L. R. 604, id. 617; Beckett v. Midland Ry. Co. L. R. 1 C. P. 241; on Appeal, 3 C. P. 82; McCarthy v. Metropolitan Board of Works, L. R. 7 C. P. 508.”

Illinois Central Railroad v. Noyes

252 Ill. 178 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1911

Lyman v. Russell, 45 Ill. 281 ; Jefferson v. Jefferson, 96 id. 551; Ronan v. Bluhm, 173 id. 277. … Francis V.

Goff v. Douglas County

132 Ill. 323 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1890

(See, also, Union County v. Patton, 63 Ill. 458 .) The statute affecting this question has undergone no material change since that case was decided. … duty of the sheriff, and when this is established, since the act of the deputy is, in legal estimation, only the act of his principal, and the sheriff can only be compensated therefor out of the amount fixed by the county board

The People v. C.G.W.R.R. Co.

379 Ill. 594 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 13, 1942

(O'Connor v. Board of Education , 288 Ill. 240 ; Williams v. People , 132 id. 574; People v. County of Tazewell , 22 id. 147; Supervisors of Fulton County v. Missouri and Wabash Railroad Co. 21 id. 337.) … Larson , v. Thompson , 377 Ill. 104 ; People v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. supra; People ex rel. Johnson , v. Southern Railway Co. 367 Ill. 389 ; People ex rel. Ward , v.

Rockford Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Rockford

352 Ill. 348 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1933

(Village of Lemont v. Jenks, 197 Ill. 363 .) In Wagner v. … (Provident Institution v. Jersey City, 113 U. S. 506 ; Dunbar v. New York, 251 id. 516 ; Turner v. Revere Water Co. 171 Mass. 329 ; Loring v. Commissioners of Public Works, 264 Mass. 460 ; City of Atlanta v.

Fierke v. Elgin City Banking Co.

359 Ill. 394 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1935

Lyon, 337 Ill. 271 ; Snyder v. … Jur. (4th ed.) secs. 1401, 1405; Edwards v. Brown, 308 Ill. 350 .

Jones v. Rallos

225 Ill. 2d 636 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 26, 2007

873 N.E.2d 943 (2007) Mark JONES, petitioner, v. Ophelia RALLOS, respondent. No. 104947. Supreme Court of Illinois. September 26, 2007. … In the exercise of this Court's supervisory authority, the Appellate Court, First District, is directed to vacate its judgment in Jones v.

County of DeWitt v. Leeper

209 Ill. 133 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1904

in that case to have been reviewed by appeal or writ of error, (People v. … In Hale v.

Niven v. Siqueira

109 Ill. 2d 357 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1985

(Maiter v. Chicago Board of Education (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 373, 390 ; Orlicki v. McCarthy (1954), 4 Ill. 2d 342, 347-48 .) … (See Matviuw v. Johnson (1982), 111 Ill.

Scholes v. Ackerland

15 Ill. 474 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1854

That bill of lading is not the one sued on, nor are we prepared to say that it is any higher evidence of the delivery on board the boat, in this suit, than the oath of the shipping clerk, that it was returned to him, duly … This doctrine is fully laid down in the case of Crawford et al. v. Clark et al., post, decided at this term.

City of Chicago v. M. & M. Hotel Co.

248 Ill. 264 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1910

Section 8 reads: “This ordinance shall not be so construed as to include boarding houses or places where board or lodging alone are furnished exclusively by the week or longer period.” … City of Cairo v. Bross, 101 Ill. 475 ; Thomas v. West Jersey Railroad Co. 101 U. S. 82 .

Williams v. Harris

198 Ill. 501 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1902

The judgment of reversal was therefore clearly on questions of law, as in the cases of Lenz v. Harrison, 148 Ill. 598 , and Hately v. Pike, 162 id. 241. … (Atwater v. American Exchange Nat. Bank, 152 Ill. 605 ; Bank of Minneapolis v. Griffin, 168 id. 314; Anderson v. South Chicago Brewing Co. 173 id. 213; Anderson Transfer Co. v. Fuller, 174 id. 221.)

In Re EH

224 Ill. 2d 172 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 2006

County Officers Electoral Board, 158 Ill.2d 391, 396 , 199 Ill.Dec. 659 , 634 N.E.2d 712 (1994); In re Application of Rosewell, 97 Ill.2d 434, 440 , 73 Ill.Dec. 748 , 454 N.E.2d 997 (1983); Osborn v. … See Wade v.

Town of Cicero v. Bartelme

212 Ill. 256 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1904

Lake Street Elevated Railroad Co. v. Shaw, 203 Ill. 39 . … In Swift & Co. v.

McConnell v. Scott

67 Ill. 274 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1873

In Michigan Insurance Co. v. Brown, 11 Mich. 271 , it was held that a mortgage given to secure all debts owing by the mortgagor to the mortgagee, was valid, and binding upon creditors and purchasers. … In the case of Barbour v.

People ex rel. Vick v. Kirkham

301 Ill. 45 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1921

(People v. Moyer, 298 Ill. 143 .) … Co. v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 121 Ill. 582 .)

Zurn v. City of Chicago

389 Ill. 114 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1945

Paul Railway Co. v. … It is lawfully delegated to administrative boards or officers, such as school officers, commissioners of highways, county boards, park commissioners or others exercising similar powers.

People v. Rinehart

356 Ill. Dec. 759 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 20, 2012

People v. … People v.

The People v. Taylor

401 Ill. 11 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1948

(People v. French, 387 Ill. 16 ; People v. Smithka, 356 Ill. 624 ; People v. Parker, 356 Ill. 301 ; People v. Crane, 356 Ill. 276 .) … People v. French, 387 Ill. 16 ; People v. Barg, 384 Ill. 172 ; People v. Brown, 383 Ill. 287 ; People v. Stacey, 372 Ill. 478 ; People v. Smithka, 356 Ill. 624 .

People v. Cranberry

45 Ill. 2d 11 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1970

In People v. Brown, 41 Ill.2d 503 , defendant had entered pleas of guilty to the crimes of murder, burglary and armed robbery. … It may well be that the defendant was afraid of receiving a severe sentence, but, as we pointed out in People v.