Case law

City of Collinsville v. Industrial Commission

36 Ill. 2d 425 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1967

At approximately 2:30 P.M. he was unloading a rotary type lawnmower from a pick-up truck by sliding it down a board. The board broke causing the mower to fall on him, throwing him to the ground on his buttocks. … In Farace v.

People v. Ketchum

72 Ill. 212 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1874

Section six of the act provides, it shall take effect when accepted by a resolution of the board of directors of the company, which, it is not controverted, was duly adopted by the board, thus giving to the transaction all … It was held by this court, in The People v.

Chadsey v. Brooks

7 Ill. 378 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1845

As we have before said, all of the counts were good, under which any-evidence could have been admitted; one good count was sufficient to defeat the motion, as was decided in the case of Anderson v. … J., and Browne, J., did not sit in this case.

Droste v. Kerner

34 Ill. 2d 495 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1966

Moloney v. … Illinois Armory Board v. Kelly, 369 Ill. 280 , 284-285 ; Broadway Bank of St. Louis v. McGee Creek Levee and Draining Dist. 292 Ill. 560, 565 .)

People v. Tenney

205 Ill. 2d 411 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2002

People v. Brown, 185 Ill. 2d 229, 247 (1998); People v. Eyler, 133 Ill. 2d 173, 191 (1989). We note that this standard of review applies in all criminal cases, whether the evidence is direct or circumstantial. People v. … Brown, 185 Ill. 2d 229, 250 (1998), quoting People v. Byron, 164 Ill. 2d 279, 299 (1995).

Village of Kincaid v. Vecchi

332 Ill. 586 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1928

It was also agreed that the board of trustees of the village regularly passed the ordinance in question; that it was regularly approved by the president of the board of trustees, published as required by law and has never … In City of Chicago v.

People ex rel. Lusk v. Cairo, Vincennes & Chicago Railway Co.

256 Ill. 286 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1912

v. … People v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. 253 Ill. 100 .

People Ex Rel. Richardson v. Ragen

400 Ill. 191 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 1948

Barrett v. Dixon, 387 Ill. 420 ; People ex rel. Ross v. Becker, 382 Ill. 404 ; People ex rel. Kerner v. McKinley, 371 Ill. 190 ; United States ex rel Palmer v. … Kimler v. Ragen, (C.C.A. 7th Cir.,) 147 Fed. 2d 137; Whitten v. Bennett, (C.C.A. 7th Cir.,) 141 Fed. 2d 295. We are of the opinion, as was said in the case of United States ex rel. Palmer v.

In re Tobin

196 Ill. 484 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1902

The will was put on a book or board to write on, and Tobin signed his name to it. All the witnesses saw him sign it. … Great stress is laid by the contestants on Drury v.

People v. Smith

228 Ill. 2d 95 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2008

People v. Gargani, 371 Ill. App. 3d 729, 731 (2007). … Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass’n v. Shapo, 357 Ill. App. 3d 122, 148 (2005); Citizens Against Regional Landfill v. Pollution Control Board, 255 Ill. App. 3d 903, 909 (1994).

Auton v. Logan Landfill, Inc.

105 Ill. 2d 537 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1985

In Isaacs v. United States, 159 U.S. 487, 491 , Mr. Justice Brown said: ‘It is no ground for reversal that the court omitted to give instructions, where they were not requested by the defendant. ***’ ” Humes v. … This was explained in Saldana v.

Winn v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

239 Ill. 132 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1909

In Partlow v. … —Revised and compiled by order of the board of trustees, by R. S. Dyas, City Attorney, 1905.” It will be observed that this pamphlet did not purport to be published by authority of the board.

White v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Chicago

233 Ill. 526 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1908

(Bindley v. Miller, 67 Ill. 244 .) … (Chicago Legal News Co. v. Browne, 103 Ill. 317 ; Palmer v. Meriden Britannia Co. 188 id. 508; Rubens v. Hill, 213 id. 523.)

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Department of Revenue

50 Ill. 2d 201 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1971

Wangelin v. City of St. Louis, 367 Ill. 57 ; St. Louis Bridge Co. v. People ex rel. Baker, 125 Ill. 226 ; Buttenuth v. St. … Plaintiff, relying upon Goldfarb v. Department of Revenue, 411 Ill. 573 ; Fillichio v. Department of Revenue, 15 Ill.2d 327 ; Miller v. Department of Revenue, 408 Ill. 574 ; and Novicki v.

Kovack v. Village of La Grange Park

18 Ill. 2d 233 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959

Kovack unsuccessfully sought a reclassification of the subject property before the zoning board of appeals and the village board, to enable him to use it as the site of a service station. … Myers v. City of Elmhurst, 12 Ill.2d 537 ; Petropoulos v. City of Chicago, 5 Ill.2d 270 .

Village of Donovan v. Donovan

236 Ill. 636 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

(Clark v. City of Chicago, 214 Ill. 318 ; City of East St. Louis v. Davis, 233 id. 553.) … The appellee introduced in evidence the record of the village board of Donovan, which shows the ordinance was passed on March 6, 1907, and no reason is pointed out why this record of the board of trustees was not sufficient

People ex rel. Robinson v. Kankakee & Seneca Railroad

282 Ill. 541 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1918

Weis, 275 Ill. 581 , there was no de jure or de facto board of education to levy the tax, and that being so, the action of the board in levying the tax was not and could not be validated by the curative act of 1917. … People v. Mathews, (ante, p. 85;) Peoples v. Leigh, (ante, p. 17.) The judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

People ex rel. Heaton v. Illinois Central Railroad

295 Ill. 408 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1920

(Huston v. Newgass, 228 Ill. 575 ; People v. Wabash Railroad Co. 276 id. 92; see, also, Lambert v. Board of Trustees, 35 Ann. Cas. (Ky.) 180, and authorities cited in note.) … (Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Co. v. People, 200 Ill. 237 .)

Conover v. Warren

6 Ill. 498 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

Jur. 475, note 2; 2 Sugden on Vendors, 59; Brown v. Gilman, 4 Wheaton, 255 ; Fish v. Howland, 1 Paige, 20 ; Williams v.

Kinnan v. Charles B. Hurst Co.

317 Ill. 251 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1925

Co. 22 Ida. 264 ; Frye v. Bath Gas and Electric Co. 97 Me. 241 ; Finley v. United States Casualty Co. 113 Tenn. 592 ; Stenbohm v. Brown-Corliss Engine Co. 137 Wis. 564 .) … (Connolly v. Bolster, supra; Cushman v. Carbondale Fuel Co. supra; Finley v. United States Casualty Co. supra; Stenbohm v. Brown-Corliss Engine Co. supra.)