Case law

People Ex Rel. Pruemer v. Illinois Central Railroad

366 Ill. 441 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1937

Members of the respective boards of directors testified for appellee. They stated they did not know on August 7, 1934, exactly how much would be required for the fiscal year. … The same questions are involved here as in People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. (ante, p. 408.) The rules there stated are applicable to the facts presented by this record.

Chandler v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.

Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 2, 2003

Epstein v. Chicago Board of Education , 178 Ill. 2d 370, 383 (1997). … Miller v. S.S. Kresge Co. , 306 Ill. 104, 106 (1922); Illinois Steel Co. v. Ostrowski , 194 Ill. 376, 385 (1902); see also Gallagher Corp. v. Russ , 309 Ill. App. 3d 192, 197 (1999); Browning v.

The People v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co.

391 Ill. 377 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1945

Carr v. … Hempen v.

People ex rel. Wetz v. Hepler

240 Ill. 196 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1909

We do not discover any sound basis for such a distinction, and have held that the rule applies to the commissioners of a drainage district in the cases of People ex rel. v. Carr, 231 Ill. 502 , and People ex rel. v. … (People ex rel. v. Schnepp, 179 Ill. 305 ; People ex rel. v. Flanker, 197 id. 409 .)

The PEOPLE v. Holmstrom

8 Ill. 2d 401 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1956

In this case the Revenue Act provided for such hearings as did the rules of the board of review. … (Town of Geneva v. Cole, 61 Ill. 397 ; People ex rel. Carr v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. 322 Ill. 150 ; People ex rel. McDonough v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Co. 354 Ill. 438 .)

Weir v. Mowe

182 Ill. 444 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1899

Caldwell, 136 id. 163; Osborne v. Williams, 34 Ill. App. 423 ; Brown v. Stewart, 159 Ill. 212 . “In Clark v. Burke, 163 Ill. 334 , it is said: ‘We have held in Freydendall v. Baldwin, 103 Ill. 330 , Hanckett v. … In Brush v.

East Side Levee & Sanitary District v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad

279 Ill. 319 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1917

(Wilson v. Board of Trustees, 133 Ill. 443 ; People v. Bowman, 247 id. 276.) … (City of Chicago v. Jackson, 196 Ill. 496 .)

Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Industrial Commission

61 Ill. 2d 139 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1975

The league schedule and notices of coming games were posted on company bulletin boards. … Jewel Tea Co. v. Industrial Com., 6 Ill.2d 304 ; Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11 . A case with a strong and we consider governing likeness to the one here is Jewel Tea Co. v.

Mitchell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.

265 Ill. 300 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1914

(Schmidt v. Brown, 226 Ill. 590 .) … Weber v. Anderson, 73 Ill. 439 ; Faloon v. Simshauser, 130 id. 649; Ely v. Brown, 183 id. 575; Kepley v. Scully, 185 id. 52.

Town of Cicero v. Fox Valley Trotting Club, Inc.

65 Ill. 2d 10 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1976

Scott v. Illinois Racing Board, 54 Ill. 2d 569, 577 .) It is apparent that defendants have focused upon the regulatory character of that plan as the basis for their preemption argument. … Johnson v. Daley, 403 Ill. 338, 342 ; Mahon v. Nudelman, 377 Ill. 331, 340 ; Reif v. Barrett, 355 Ill. 104, 123 .)

Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Industrial Commission

325 Ill. 102 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1927

She testified that while she was working at her board about noon she “got an awful bang in the earthat the noise was so violent that she could neither speak nor hear for an instant; that her ear and head began to ache and … (Ideal Fuel Co. v. Industrial Com. 298 Ill. 463 ; Hansen v. Turner Construction Co. 224 N. Y. 331 , 120 N. E. 693 ; In re Maggelet, 228 Mass. 57 , 116 N. E. 972 .)

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R. v. People

77 Ill. 443 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1875

We can not think that, until this schedule of rates was made by the board .of commissioners, there would, under the statute, be incurred a liability for unreasonable and extortionate charges; nor that, when the schedules … Co. v. The People, 67 Ill. 11 , to the legislature making any fixed rates conclusive of what was reasonable, and to follow the intimation in 'that opinion, that the should be made but prima facAe evidence.

Whipple v. Pope

33 Ill. 334 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1864

Nye v. Vanhuson, 6 Mich. 346 . In the case of Kellogg v. … Benson, 20 Ill. 500 , and Robinson v. Nye, 21 id. 592 . In those cases the stipulations were for responsibility only against willful defaults, and the deeds were held fraudulent and void.. In Brown v.

Swift & Co. v. Industrial Commission

381 Ill. 77 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1942

Barto v. Industrial Com. 359 Ill. 625 ; Clausen v. Industrial Com. 346 id. 474; Simpson Co. v. Industrial Com. 337 id. 454. … (Skaggs v. Industrial Com. 371 Ill. 535 ; Wahlgren v. Industrial Com. 323 id. 194.)

People v. Smith

228 Ill. 2d 95 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2008

People v. Gargani, 371 Ill. App. 3d 729, 731 (2007). … Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass’n v. Shapo, 357 Ill. App. 3d 122, 148 (2005); Citizens Against Regional Landfill v. Pollution Control Board, 255 Ill. App. 3d 903, 909 (1994).

Mead v. City of Chicago

186 Ill. 54 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1900

The estimate is wholly different from the one in the case of Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad Co. v. … D. 1847, as established by the trustees of the Illinois arid Michigan canal and adopted by the late board of drainage commissioners and by the late board of public works of the city of Chicag'o as the basis or datum for city

Zion Church v. Mensch

178 Ill. 225 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1899

Husser, 146 Ill. 399 ; that the “Esherites,” so-called, were decided by this court in Schweiker v. … (Scanlan v. Keith, 102 Ill. 634 ; Hypes v. Griffin, 89 id. 134; New Market Savings Bank v. Gillet, 100 id. 254). The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Department of Revenue

50 Ill. 2d 201 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1971

Wangelin v. City of St. Louis, 367 Ill. 57 ; St. Louis Bridge Co. v. People ex rel. Baker, 125 Ill. 226 ; Buttenuth v. St. … Plaintiff, relying upon Goldfarb v. Department of Revenue, 411 Ill. 573 ; Fillichio v. Department of Revenue, 15 Ill.2d 327 ; Miller v. Department of Revenue, 408 Ill. 574 ; and Novicki v.

In Re Sherre

68 Ill. 2d 56 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1977

The convictions on counts 9, 10, 11 and 15 of the indictment were affirmed in United States v. Joyce (7th Cir. 1974), 499 F.2d 9 . … That body found that “[r] espondent was not candid, forthright nor remorseful in his testimony before the Hearing Board.”

Field v. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad

71 Ill. 458 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1874

Ambs v. Honore, 24 Ill. 122 ; Eastman v. Brown, 32 ib. 53. And it was emphatically said in Wood v. Price, 46 ib. 435, that the same force and effect should be given to the finding of a judge as to the verdict of a jury. … The question is the one presented and decided in Adams Express Co. v.