Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

10,000+ results

2.52s

  • The People v. Huber

    389 Ill. 192 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1945

    (People v. French, 387 Ill. 16 ; People v. O’Brien, 306 Ill. 340 ; People v. Hartsig, 249 Ill. 348 ; People v. Murphy, 188 Ill. 144 .) … French, 387 Ill. 16 , and People v. Brown, 383 Ill. 287 , it becomes unnecessary to remand the cause. Under the facts disclosed, remandment for resentencing is not required.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of East St. Louis v. East St. Louis Financial Advisory Authority

    188 Ill. 2d 474 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1999

    See, e.g., Balmoral Racing Club, Inc. v. Illinois Racing Board, 151 Ill. 2d 367, 390 (1992); Fumarolo v. Chicago Board of Education, 142 Ill. 2d 54, 96 (1990); People v. … Kozak v. Retirement Board of the Firemen’s Annuity & Benefit Fund, 95 Ill. 2d 211, 215 (1983).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hansberg v. People

    120 Ill. 21 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1886

    Beer has different names, as, small beer, ale, porter, brown stout, lager beer, etc., according to its strength or other qualities.” … Lathrop v. The State, 50 Ind. 555 ; Klare v. The State, 43 id. 435; The State v. Chappel, 116 Mass. 7 ; Commonwealth v. Blas, id. 56 ; The State v. Starr, 67 Me. 242 ; The State v. Wall, 34 id. 165; The State v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Director of Public Health v. Calvo

    89 Ill. 2d 130 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1982

    The State’s Attorney relies on United States v. Nixon (1974), 418 U.S. 683 , 41 L. Ed. 2d 1039 , 94 S. Ct. 3090 , and People ex rel. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board v. … People v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

    171 Ill. 40 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1897

    The record shows on its face that the resolution ordering the assessment “was unanimously adopted by the directors as a board, and by the executive committee,” and it contained the necessary data for computing the amount. … (VanFrank v. United States Masonic Benevolent Ass. 158 Ill. 560 ; Bagley v. Ancient Order United Workmen, 131 id. 498.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Logg v. People

    92 Ill. 598 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1879

    Gates v. The People, 14 Ill. 433 ; Perteet v. The People, 70 id. 171; Smith v. The People, 74 id. 144. It .does not appear here that the defendants could have been surprised by the examination of this witness. … Calef v. Thomas, 81 Ill. 478 ; Evans v. George, 80 id. 51; Ogden v. Kirby, 79 id. 555; The Rockford Ins. Co. v. Nelson, 75 id. 548; Hewett v. Johnson, 72 id. 513.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Lloyd v. Karnes

    45 Ill. 62 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1867

    The case of McLagan v. Brown, 11 Ill. 523 , is cited in support of this position. The difference between that case and this is quite obvious. … McKay v. Bassett, 5 Gilm. 499 ;. White v. Morrison, 11 Ill. 361 ; Rowan v. Bowles, 21 id. 17; Chaffin v. Heirs of Kimball, 23 id. 36; Kish v. Cleland, 33 id. 239; Bush v. Connelly, id. 448.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Weise v. City of Chicago

    200 Ill. 339 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1902

    The lease executed by the board of education to the appellant contained the following stipulation: “The said party of the second part, George B. … —State v. Markey, 21 La. Ann. 743 ; Raleigh v. Rogers, 25 N. J. Eq. 506; Swackhamer v. Kline, id. 503; Morris v. Garrison, 27 Pa. St. 226; Eclan v. Lancasterian School, 2 Path & H. (Va.) 53.” (2 Cyc. note 49, p. 629.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corp.

    111 Ill. 2d 350 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1986

    Springfield v. Board of Election Commissioners (1985), 105 Ill. 2d 336, 341 . See also Fitzsimmons v. Norgle (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 369, 373 ; Chastek v. Anderson (1981), 83 Ill. 2d 502, 510 . … McDonald v. Board of Election Commissioners (1969), 394 U.S. 802, 809 , 22 L. Ed. 2d 739, 745 , 89 S. Ct. 1404, 1408 .

    Cited 221 timesPublished
  • Kelley v. Vigas

    112 Ill. 242 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1884

    The same doctrine had previously been declared in Doggett v. Stock, 8 Metc. 450 , and in Tillingast v. Cook; 9 id. 143. … Richards v. Miller, 62 Ill. 417 ; Basset v. Granger, 100 Mass. 348 ; Boskin’s Appeal, S Pa. St. 304. This case may be readily distinguished from Pitney v. Brown, 44 Ill. 363 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Hobbs v. Pinnell

    17 Ill. 2d 535 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1959

    (Georgeoff v. Spencer, 400 Ill. 300 ; Texas Company v. Hollingsworth, 375 Ill. 536 ; Abernathie v. Rich, 229 Ill. 412 .) … Knopf v. Chicago Real Estate Board, 173 Ill. 196 ; Abernathie v. Rich, 229 id. 412; McMechan v. Yenter, 301 id. 508; Webster v. Jackson, 304 id. 569; Mortimore v. Bashore, 317 id. 535.” Gaumer v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Purcell v. Town of Bear Creek

    138 Ill. 524 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1891

    In Lower v. United States, 91 U. … It is also said the board of town auditors had no right to make the levy, because the bonds were not due.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Southern Railway Co. v. Cullen

    221 Ill. 392 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1906

    Caron v. B. & A. R. R. Co. 164 Mass. 527 . … Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad Co. v. Brown, 123 Ill. 162 . In Illinois Central Railroad Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

    61 Ill. 2d 494 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1975

    (Illinois Coal Operators Association v. Pollution Control Board, 59 Ill.2d 305, 311 ; Youhas v. Ice, 56 Ill.2d 497, 500 ; Begich v. Industrial Com., 42 Ill.2d 32, 35 ; People ex rel. County of Du Page v. … Board’s regulations, though identical equipment used in mining was regulated.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • The PEOPLE v. Granberry

    45 Ill. 2d 11 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1970

    In People v. Brown, 41 Ill.2d 503 , defendant had entered pleas of guilty to the crimes of murder, burglary and armed robbery. … It may well be that the defendant was afraid of receiving a severe sentence, but, as we pointed out in People v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cochran v. Fogler

    116 Ill. 194 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1886

    Brown, Admr. 21 Ill. 270 , relied upon by appellant, is not an authority to show that the writ of assistance was improperly granted in this case. … As was said in Aldrich v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Saxby v. Sonnemann

    318 Ill. 600 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1925

    In McQuade v. … It was held in People v. Dunne, 258 Ill. 441 , following People v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Jefferson Printing Co. v. Industrial Commission

    312 Ill. 575 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1924

    (Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. Industrial Board, 284 Ill. 378 .) The act of vaccination of Lasseter was not unexpected and was in itself not an accident. The infection was not expected.' … (Edelweiss Gardens v. Industrial Com. 29 Ill. 459 ; also Krout v. Hudson Co. supra.)

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • In Re D'Angelo

    126 Ill. 2d 45 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1988

    The case eventually reached this court (City of Chicago v. Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp. (1978), 71 Ill. 2d 333 ), which ruled in favor of the city, holding Avis liable for the tickets. … After an unsuccessful petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court (Avis Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. City of Chicago (1978), 439 U.S. 929 , 58 L. Ed. 2d 322 , 99 S.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Vance v. Rankin

    194 Ill. 625 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1902

    (Wikel v. Board of Comrs. of Jackson County, 120 N. C. 451 .) … (Hartung v. People, 22 N. Y. 95 ; Hubbard v. State, 2 Tex. App. 506; Atwell v. Grant, 11 Md. 104 ; United States v. Peggy, 1 Cranch, 103 ; Mayor of Annapolis v. Maryland, 30 Md. 112 .) In Musgrove v. V. & N. R. R.

    Cited 49 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.