Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

10,000+ results

2.65s

  • B. O.C.T.R.R. Co. v. Industrial Com.

    366 Ill. 223 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1937

    (Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Industrial Board , 284 Ill. 267 .) … Industrial Board , 273 Ill. 528 ; Dickinson v. Industrial Board , 280 id. 342 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Geiger v. Merle

    360 Ill. 497 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1935

    (Kuhnen v. Kuhnen, 351 Ill. 591 ; Brown v. Brown, 329 id. 198; Debolt v. Blackburn, 328 id. 420; Warner v. Warner, 235 id. 448.) … (Landes v. Landes, 268 Ill. 11 ; Brown v. Brown., supra.) The ante-nuptial agreement was likewise a simple document, phrased in simple enough language for her to understand.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • People v. Smith

    2016 IL 119659 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jul 13, 2017

    People v. … People v. Brown, 2015 IL App (1st) 140508.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Bernstein v. Bernstein

    398 Ill. 52 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1947

    (Carter v. Carter, 283 Ill. 324 ; Mosbarger v. Brown, 313 id. 238.) … Houlihan v. Morrissey, 270 Ill. 66 ; Jaworski v. Sujewicz, 334 Ill. 19 ; Finney v. White, 389 Ill. 374 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Clayter

    78 Ill. 2d 276 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1980

    The Review Board affirmed the recommendation of the hearing panel. The respondent was licensed to practice law in Illinois in 1957. … Chicago Bar Association v. Hachtman (1982), 350 Ill. 326, 329-30 ; In re Lingle (1963), 27 Ill. 2d 459, 463-64 ; In re Bloom (1968), 39 Ill. 2d 250, 253 ; In re Sherman (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 590 .)

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • City of Chicago v. Industrial Commission

    389 Ill. 592 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1945

    Industrial Com. 376 Ill. 207 ; Great American Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Com. 367 Ill. 241 ; Farley v. Industrial Com. 378 Ill. 234 , and Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial Board, 283 Ill. 148 . … To support the award defendant in error says the liberal rule is in force in this State, and cites Mueller Construction Co. v. Industrial Board, 283 Ill. 148 ; Illinois Publishing Co. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Jacobs

    61 Ill. 2d 590 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1975

    (People v. Aliwoli (1975), 60 Ill.2d 579 ; People v. Brown (1968), 39 Ill.2d 307 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Culter v. Reynolds

    64 Ill. 321 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1872

    This whole question was also fully discussed in Ex parte Brown, 2 Story R. 502. … Woodruff v. The Merchants’ Bank, 25 Wend. 673 . The same decision was affirmed in the court of errors, 6 Hill, 174 . In Bowen v. Newell, 8 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Gordon

    194 Ill. 560 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1902

    In answer to these contentions we only deem it necessai'y to cite the cases of Williams v. People, 121 Ill. 84 , and People v. … A. 334; Nelson v. State Board of Health, (Ky.) 57 S. W. Rep. 501 ; State v. Mylod, (R. I.) 40 Atl. Rep. 753 . We have carefully examined these cases, and find that neither of them sustains the contention.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • The People v. Reilly

    348 Ill. 153 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1932

    (People v. Cobb, 343 Ill. 78 ; People v. Brown, 325 id. 307.) … People v. Fisher, 303 Ill. 594 ; People v. Martin, 304 id. 494; People v. Stella, 344 id. 589; People v. Terracco, 346 id. 423.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In Re Application for Judgment & Sale of Delinquent Properties

    167 Ill. 2d 161 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1995

    Board of Education of Community Unit School District No. 16 v. Barrett (1977), 67 Ill. 2d 11, 14-15 . … Hepner v. County Board of School Trustees (1956), 8 Ill. 2d 235, 242 . The parties refer to Stofer v. Motor Vehicle Casualty Co.

    Cited 88 timesPublished
  • Catherwood v. Morris

    351 Ill. 557 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1933

    (Rasch v. Rasch, 278 Ill. 261 ; Wirzbicky v. Dranicki, 235 id. 106.) … Brown v. Kienstra, 337 Ill. 641 ; People v. Rettich, 332 id. 49; Italia America Shipping Corp. v. Nelson, 323 id. 427; People v. Apfelbaum, 251 id. 18. The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Chicago v. Rothschild & Co.

    212 Ill. 590 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1904

    Chicago City Railway Co. v. People, 73 Ill. 541 ; Metropolitan City Railway Co. v. Chicago West Division Railway Co. 87 id. 317; Board of Trade of Chicago v. People, 91 id. 80; Mills v. … In Board of Trade of Chicago v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Osborne v. Sprowls

    84 Ill. 2d 390 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1981

    See also Mieher v. Brown (1973), 54 Ill. 2d 539, 544-45 ; Barnes v. Washington (1973), 56 Ill. 2d 22, 29 ; Boyd v. Racine Currency Exchange, Inc. (1973), 56 Ill. 2d 95, 99 ; Cunis v. … Wilcox v. Equity Funding Life Insurance Co. (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 303, 313 ; Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc. (1975), 60 Ill. 2d 141, 147 ; Brown v. Lober (1979), 75 Ill. 2d 547, 556 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Abt v. American Trust & Savings Bank

    159 Ill. 467 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1896

    (Brown v. Leckie, 43 Ill. 497 ; Union Nat. Bank v. Oceana County Bank, 80 id. 212; Bank of America v. Indiana Banking Co. 114 id. 483.) … (Mason v. Dousay, 35 Ill. 424 ; Lewis v. Headley, 36 id. 433 ; Adams v. Robertson, 37 id. 45; Roundtree v. Baker, 52 id. 241; Davenport v. Karnes, 70 id. 465; Evans v. Anderson, 78 id. 558.)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Webber v. Clark

    136 Ill. 256 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1891

    Talcott v. Dudley, 4 Scam. 427 ; Holbrook v. Brenner, 31 Ill. 502 ; Burgett v. Paxton, 99 id. 288; Wiegleb v. Thomsen, 102 id. 156; Rhoads v. Blackiston, 106 Mass. 324 ; Stewart v. Platt, 11 Otto, 731 ; Yeatman v. … Grant and Brown undoubtedly acted together to accomplish the same purpose.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People v. Dowery

    62 Ill. 2d 200 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1975

    But ‘[d] espite its broad deterrent purpose, the exclusionary rule has never been interpreted to proscribe the use of illegally seized evidence in all proceedings or against all persons.’ ” (Brown v. … Brown (5th Cir. 1973), 488 F.2d 94 ; United States v. Hill (7th Cir. 1971), 447 F.2d 817 ; United States ex rel. Sperling v. Fitzpatrick (2d Cir. 1970), 426 F.2d 1161 ; United States ex rel. Lombardino v. Heyd (E.D.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. George v. Wabash Railroad

    248 Ill. 540 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1911

    The proceedings by which this additional levy was sought to be made, in each instance consisted of the making of a certificate by the highway commissioners to the board of town auditors and assessor, the giving of consent … (People v. Kankakee and Southwestern Railroad Co. 237 Ill. 362 .) It is for such purposes that the regular levy authorized by section 13 of the act is provided.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • James T. Hair Co. v. Daily

    161 Ill. 379 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 12, 1896

    (Patten v. Patten, 75 Ill. 446 ; Craig v. McKinney, 72 id. 305; Thornton v. Thornton, 31 Gratt. 212 ; Clark v. Pierce, 52 Mich. 157 ; McKenzie v. Johnston, 4 Madd. 375.) … It was to this rule the court had reference when Brown v. Mortgage Co. 110 Ill. 235 , Mix v. People, 116 id. 265 , and Goodwin v. Bishop, 145 id. 421, were decided.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Chicago Mutual Life Indemnity Ass'n v. Hunt

    2 L.R.A. 549 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1889

    Attorney General v. Utica Ins. Co. 2 Johns. Ch. 370 ; Slee v. Bloom, 5 id. 366; State v. Merchant’s Ins. Co. 8 Humph. 234 ; Attorney General v. Bank of Niagara, 1 Hopkins’ Ch. 334; Doremus v. Dutch Reformed Church, 3 N. … Eq. 332; Doyle v. Peerless Petroleum Co. 1 Edw. Ch. 83 ; Strong v. McCagg, 55 Wis. 624 ; 2 Morawetz on Corporations, sec. 1040.

    Cited 37 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.