Case law

Devine v. Devine

180 Ill. 447 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1899

(Reed v. Reed, 135 Ill. 482 ; Keith v. Miller, 174 id. 64; Perry v. McHenry, 13 id. 227; Sayre v. Townsend, 15 Wend. 550 .) … (Clinton v. Kidwell, 82 Ill. 427 ; Robinson v. Brems, 90 id. 351; Reeves v. Webster, 71 id. 307.)

The People v. Binga

360 Ill. 18 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1935

Wilson on the board of directors as treasurer. … Such a defense was presented in McKnight v.

The People v. Burson

11 Ill. 2d 360 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 23, 1957

(Brown v. People, 8 Ill.2d 540 .) These views are in accord with the rule in other jurisdictions.|Yn 14 Am. … (Brown v. People, 8 Ill.2d 540 ; People v. Maynard, 347 Ill. 422 .)

People Ex Rel. Soble v. Gill

358 Ill. 261 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1934

Hunt v. Rosenbaum Grain Corp. 355 Ill. 504 ; People v. McBride, supra; Joel v. Bennett, 276 Ill. 537 ; Victor Chemical Works v. Industrial Board, 274 id. 11. … To fortify this position, counsel for the relators cite People v. Board of County Comrs. 355 Ill. 244, 250 . It is true that such statement, in substance, is made in the opinion in that case.

In re Bates

118 Ill. 524 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1886

(Sweet et al. v. Redhead, 76 Ill. 374 ; Brown v. Cozard, 68 id. 178; United States v. Duncan, 12 id. 523.) … Brown v. Cozard, supra; Sweet v. Redhead, supra. The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Hines v. Industrial Commission

295 Ill. 231 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1920

(Dickinson v. Industrial Board, 280 Ill. 342 ; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Behrens, 233 U. S. 473 ; Pederson v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co. 229 id. 146.) … (Michigan Central Railroad Co. v. Vreeland, 227 U. S. 59 .) The Industrial Board had no jurisdiction to act in this case.

People v. Hill

2020 IL 124595 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2021

Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983). Therefore, probable cause does not require an officer to rule out any innocent explanations for suspicious facts. District of Columbia v. Wesby, 583 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S. … Brown, 460 U.S. at 742; accord Wesby, 583 U.S. at ___, 138 S.

People ex rel. Gleason v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

339 Ill. 300 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1930

In People v. Cairo and Thebes Railroad Co. 319 Ill. 118 , and in People v. … In People v.

People Ex Rel. Larson v. Thomson

381 Ill. 48 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1942

Badenoch v. City of Chicago, 222 Ill. 71 ; People ex rel. Stuckart v. Knopf, 183 id. 410. … Kincaid v.

Metropolitan San. Dist. v. Poll. Cont. Bd.

62 Ill. 2d 38 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1975

The District, in support of its position, cites Citizens Utilities Co. v. Pollution Control Board, 9 Ill. App.3d 158 , and Molex, Inc. v. Pollution Control Board, 9 Ill. App.3d 1032 . … Pollution Control Board, 60 Ill.2d 204, 208 .) In City of Monmouth v.

State of Illinois v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31

2016 IL 118422 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2016

Orenic v. Illinois State Labor Relations Board, 127 Ill. 2d 453, 481 (1989). … Antry v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board, 195 Ill. App. 3d 221, 270-71 (1990) (citing Abood v.

People ex rel. Standerfer v. Hamill

134 Ill. 666 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1888

Gregory, 15 Ill. 20 , City of Virden v. … Lockport v. Gaylord, 61 Ill. 276 ; Middleport v. Ætna Life Ins. Co. 82 id. 562.

Prickett v. People

88 Ill. 115 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

Madison county,” as employed in this bequest, means the poor of the county in a technical sense,—that is, those poor people whom the county is legally liable to support, as has been decided by this court in Heuser et al. v. … , he charged himself with this fund, which statements were approved by said county board.

Cooper v. McClun

16 Ill. 435 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1855

Chapman v. Shattuck, 3 Gil. R. 49. … Brown and Ives v. Minturn and Champlin, 2 Gallison R. 557.

People v. Culver

304 Ill. 566 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1922

(People v. Keener, 194 Ill. 16 .) The burden of showing that it is illegal or unjust is upon him who would avoid the tax. … Appellee cites Tolman v. Raymond, 202 Ill. 197 . That case is to be distinguished from the case at bar.

Marsh v. Green

79 Ill. 385 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1875

In the case of Curtiss v. Brown, 29 111. 201, it was held, that such a grantor was not a necessary party. That case is conclusive of this question.

People v. Dolgin

6 Ill. 2d 109 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 20, 1955

(People v. Brown, (Ill.) (not reported) ; People v. Heirens, 4 Ill. 2d 131 ; Jennings v. Illinois, 342 U.S. 104 .) The petition here is clearly within this bar. … Barrett v. Bradley, 391 Ill. 169 ; People v. Mundro, 326 Ill. 324 . The judgment of the criminal court of Cook County is reversed, and it is ordered that the original sentence of that court be reinstated and restored.

In re Alexander

146 Ill. 2d 83 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1991

A panel of the Hearing Board (Board) determined that there were no facts tending to show that respondent, at the time he made the loan, knew that he was violating the Code, or that he intended to receive any direct benefit … On October 18, 1982, during the pendency of the loan, a lawsuit, Greenspan v. Schmitt, was filed in the circuit court of Cook County.

People Ex Rel. Village of South Chicago Heights v. Bergin

340 Ill. 20 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1930

VanNada v. Goedde, 263 Ill. 105 ; Gifford v. Culver, 261 id. 530; Richter v. Burdock, 257 id. 410; Marshall v. Silliman, 61 id. 218. … voted for such detachment, places an unreasonable power in the hands of the board of trustees.

Johnston v. City of Bloomington

77 Ill. 2d 108 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1979

(Acorn Auto Driving School, Inc. v. Board of Education (1963), 27 Ill. 2d 93 .) Relying primarily on our decision in People v. … Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of Bloomington (1911), 253 Ill. 164 , upon which plaintiffs rely, involved no prior judgment and is clearly distinguishable.