Case law

The People v. Wilson Car Lines, Inc.

369 Ill. 294 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1938

In Keith Railway Equipment Co. v. … (People v. Board of Appeals, 367 Ill. 559 .) Thus, the assessment entered against defendant for the year 1933 was made without authority and is void.

County of Cook v. Glasstex Co.

16 Ill. 2d 72 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1959

Appellee relies upon the cases of the City of Chicago v. Sachs, 1 Ill.2d 342 , and Johnson v. … Bank v. County of Cook, 12 Ill.2d 40 .)

Metropolitan San. Dist. v. Poll. Cont. Bd.

62 Ill. 2d 38 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1975

The District, in support of its position, cites Citizens Utilities Co. v. Pollution Control Board, 9 Ill. App.3d 158 , and Molex, Inc. v. Pollution Control Board, 9 Ill. App.3d 1032 . … Pollution Control Board, 60 Ill.2d 204, 208 .) In City of Monmouth v.

People v. Upton

114 Ill. 2d 362 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1986

The defendant here was subject to a greater penalty for delivery of .4 grams of a harmless brown powder than a person who would have actually delivered any amount of a schedule IV or V controlled substance under sections … (People v. Bradley (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 410, 418 ; see also United States Railroad Retirement Board v. Fritz (1980), 449 U.S. 166, 187 , 66 L. Ed. 2d 368, 384 , 101 S. Ct. 453, 466 (Brennan, J., dissenting).)

Graham v. General U.S. Grant Post No. 2665

43 Ill. 2d 1 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1969

(Cunningham v. Brown, 22 Ill.2d 23 .) Although some 21 other States have adopted dramshop acts in varying forms, the Illinois Act is particularly severe in two respects. … The precise issue was definitely decided by us in Cunningham v. Brown, 22 Ill.2d 23 .

Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302

24 Ill. 2d 467 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1962

We then granted the requests of the Chicago Park District, the Illinois Association of School Boards, the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, and the Forest Preserve District to intervene and to file briefs as amici … Nor, does this holding affect the intervening decisions of Peters v. Bellinger, 19 Ill.2d 367 , or List v. O’Connor, 19 Ill.2d 337 .

Craig v. Sullivan MacHinery Co.

344 Ill. 334 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1931

American Hide and Leather Co. v. Southern Railway Co. 310 Ill. 524 ; Friend & Co. v. Goldsmith & Seidel Co. 307 id. 45; Congregational Publishing Society v. Board of Review, 290 id. 108; Boos v. … Young, 120 Ill. 184 ; Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. Industrial Board, 282 id. 136.)

Cooper v. McClun

16 Ill. 435 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1855

Chapman v. Shattuck, 3 Gil. R. 49. … Brown and Ives v. Minturn and Champlin, 2 Gallison R. 557.

Elmore Real Estate Improvement Co. v. Olson

392 Ill. 46 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1945

(Browning v. Browning, 379 Ill. 29 ; Wright v. Logan, 364 Ill. 33 .) … (Cohen v. Oguss, 384 Ill. 353 .)

Nudell v. FOREST PRESERVE DIST. OF COOK

207 Ill. 2d 409 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 17, 2003

Plaintiff cites Lockett v. Chicago Police Board, 133 Ill.2d 349 , 140 Ill.Dec. 394 , 549 N.E.2d 1266 (1990), and Carver v. … See Keller v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund, 245 Ill.App.3d 48 , 185 Ill.Dec. 189 , 614 N.E.2d 323 (1993); Poturalski v.

People ex rel. Cox v. Freeman

301 Ill. 562 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1922

the petition of the board the certificate was approved by the county court. … The question of the identity of the improvement, however, was adjudicated by the county court when it approved the certificate of completion upon the petition of the board of local improvements. People v.

People v. Knutson

12 Ill. 2d 78 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1957

In support of his position defendant cites Rochin v. People of California, 342 U.S. 165 , which involved forcible extraction of narcotic capsules from the defendant’s stomach; and People v. … People v. Brown, 415 Ill. 626 .

Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Massey

152 Ill. 144 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1894

He was also negligent in ordering his men to board the train and causing the train to be started northward with them on board, when he ought to have known, and if .he had read the order in his possession "would have known … Louis Railroad Co. v. Morgenstern, 106 Ill. 216 ; Lake Erie and Western Railroad Co. v. Middleton, 142 id. 550; Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Laack, 143 id. 242.

New Staunton Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

328 Ill. 89 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1927

Louis Smelting Co. v. Industrial Com. 298 Ill. 272 ; Ideal Fuel Co. v. Industrial Com. id. 463; Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 id. 11. … (Field & Co. v. Industrial Com. 305 Ill. 134 ; Central Car Works v. Industrial Com. 290 id. 436; Jackson v. Industrial Com. 302 id. 281.) In Yellow Cab Co. v.

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Monaghan

140 Ill. 474 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1892

(Horton v. Horton, 2 Cow. 589 ; Smith v. Thompson, 1 id. 221; Cook v. Walters, 4 Iowa, 72 ; Armleder v. Lieberman, 33 Ohio St. 77 ; Morrow v. Comrs. of Saline Co. 21 Kan. 484 ; Brown v. … (Parker v. Overman, 18 How. 141 ; Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. 115 ; Brock v. Doyle, 18 Florida, 172 ; Kelly v. Houghton, 23 Fed. Rep. 417; Dillon’s Rem. of Causes—5 ed.—pge 109, sec. 98, and cases cited in notes.)

City of East St. Louis v. Illinois Central Railroad

238 Ill. 296 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1909

Hull v. People, 170 Ill. 246 ; Pfeiffer v. People, 170 id. 347 . … As was said in City of Peru v.

Prickett v. People

88 Ill. 115 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

Madison county,” as employed in this bequest, means the poor of the county in a technical sense,—that is, those poor people whom the county is legally liable to support, as has been decided by this court in Heuser et al. v. … , he charged himself with this fund, which statements were approved by said county board.

In re Bates

118 Ill. 524 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1886

(Sweet et al. v. Redhead, 76 Ill. 374 ; Brown v. Cozard, 68 id. 178; United States v. Duncan, 12 id. 523.) … Brown v. Cozard, supra; Sweet v. Redhead, supra. The judgment of the Appellate Court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

In re Alexander

146 Ill. 2d 83 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1991

A panel of the Hearing Board (Board) determined that there were no facts tending to show that respondent, at the time he made the loan, knew that he was violating the Code, or that he intended to receive any direct benefit … On October 18, 1982, during the pendency of the loan, a lawsuit, Greenspan v. Schmitt, was filed in the circuit court of Cook County.

Chicago, Pekin & Southwestern Railroad v. Raymond

97 Ill. 212 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1880

capital stock for the years 1873 and 1874, in the counties of Woodford, LaSalle, Livingston and Tazewell, and also so much of the tax as was levied upon the increased valuation of the tangible property made by the State Board … See The Pacific Hotel Co. v. Lieb et al. 83 Ill. 602 ; Huck et al. v. Chicago and Alton Railroad Co. 86 id. 352; Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co. v. Sides, 88 id. 32.