Case law

Env. Prot. Agency v. Poll. Cont. Bd.

115 Ill. 2d 65 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1986

115 Ill.2d 65 (1986) 503 N.E.2d 343 THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Appellant, v. THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD et al. (Waste Management, Inc., Appellee). No. 63062. Supreme Court of Illinois. … In like cases, it is the Board, not the Agency, which must determine whether a permit should issue. In Environmental Protection Agency v.

Thompson v. Sornberger

78 Ill. 353 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1875

Brown et al. v. Smith et al. 24 Ill. 196 , cited by appellant, is not, in principle, like this, nor was the Practice Act, in 1860, when that case was decided, so liberal in its provisions as the present statute. … In Jackson v.

People ex rel. Cox v. Freeman

301 Ill. 562 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1922

the petition of the board the certificate was approved by the county court. … The question of the identity of the improvement, however, was adjudicated by the county court when it approved the certificate of completion upon the petition of the board of local improvements. People v.

People Ex Rel. Adamowski v. Chicago Land Clearance Commission

14 Ill. 2d 74 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 21, 1958

Gutknecht v. … Gutknecht v.

E. E. Walsh Teaming Co. v. Industrial Commission

290 Ill. 536 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1919

(Lefens v. Industrial Com. 286 Ill. 32 .) Such proof may be made by circumstantial evidence. Smith-Lohr Coal Mining Co. v. Industrial Com. 286 Ill. 34 ; Ohio Building Vault Co. v. Industrial Board, 277 id. 96 . … The cases of Dietzen Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 Ill. 11 , Northern Illinois Traction Co. v. Industrial Board, 279 id. 565, and Central Garage of LaSalle v. Industrial Com. 286 id. 291, are not in point.

Kocsis v. Chicago Park District

362 Ill. 24 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1935

(Board of Education v. Upham, 357 Ill. 263 ; People v. Bowman, 247 id. 276 ; Perkins v. Cook County Comrs. 271 id. 449.) … Board of Trustees v. Lincoln Park Comrs. 282 Ill. 348 ; Lincoln Park Comrs. v. Fahrney, 250 id. 256.

Stevens v. Stevens

256 Ill. 140 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1912

Among the many cases in this State in which this doctrine has been stated are Stinson v. Anderson, 96 Ill. 373 ; Weaver v. Weaver, 182 id. 287; Hawes v. Hawes, 177 id. 409; Munro v. Bowles, 187 id. 346; Taylor v. … Seiter, 199 id. 555; Lange v. Cullinan, 205 id. 365; Spacy v. Ritter, 214 id. 266; Noble v. Tipton, 219 id. 182.

Givins v. People ex rel. Raymond

194 Ill. 150 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1901

The principle which governs such instances was declared and applied in Hamilton v. Lubukee, 51 Ill. 415 , Bush v. Sherman, 80 id. 160, Connely v. Rue, 148 id. 207, and Ingalls v. Rowell, 149 id. 168. … The cases of Fishburn v. City of Chicago, 171 Ill. 338 , and Conway v.

Hough v. Coughlan

41 Ill. 130 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1866

Rector v. Rector, 3 Gilm. 105 . … Brown et al. v. Gaffney et al., 28 Ill. 149 . Another point made against appellant is, the unexplained laches of Horgan.

In Re Feldman

373 Ill. 563 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1940

The board of managers of the Chicago Bar Association then recommended disbarment. Later, additional evidence was taken. … Respondent was not present when his counsel was endeavoring to persuade the board of managers to make a less severe recommendation.

Country Mutual Insurance v. Knight

40 Ill. 2d 423 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1968

(Board of Education of Normal School District v. Blodgett, 155 Ill. 441, 447 ; see 133 A.L.R. 384 , 11 I.L.P. “Constitutional Law”, sec. 205.) … In Douglas Aircraft v. Cranston, 24 Cal.

Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Department of Revenue

63 Ill. 2d 474 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 28, 1976

(Scribner v. Sachs (1960), 18 Ill.2d 400, 411 .) … Carruthers v. Cooper (1949), 404 Ill. 395, 400 .)

People ex rel. Stifle v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

321 Ill. 496 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1926

In People v. … interpreted in the case of People v.

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McGrath

115 Ill. 172 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1885

(Sills v. Brown, 9 Carr. & Payne, 601.) … In the case of Cook, Admr. v. New York Central Railroad, Co. 5 Lansing, 401, it was so ruled. And see The State v. Turner, 1 Wright, (Ohio,) -21, and. note to above, citation from Phillips.

People ex rel. Stuckart v. N. J. Sandberg Co.

282 Ill. 245 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1917

In People v. … (People v. Wisconsin Central Railroad Co. 219 Ill. 94 ; People v. Militzer, 272 id. 387; People v. Madison, 280 id. 96; People v. Stitt, id. 553.)

Reid v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance

59 Ill. 2d 194 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1974

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (3d Cir. 1963), 323 F.2d 174 , rejected in Brown v. Travelers Insurance Co. (1969), 434 Pa. 507 , 254 A.2d 27 , and changed by Pa. Stat. Ann., tit. 77, sec. 501 (1974-75 Supp.)). … (See, e.g., Larson; Brown v. Travelers Insurance Co.)

Flynn v. Kucharski

53 Ill. 2d 88 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1972

In the first appeal (Flynn v. … In the second appeal (Flynn v.

Moll v. Industrial Commission

288 Ill. 347 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1919

While engaged in the work at the company’s mine Moll lodged and boarded at Corbin’s and performed chores there mornings and evenings. … (Roszek v. Bauerle & Stark Co. 282 Ill. 557 ; Messmer v. Industrial Board, id. 562 .)

People ex rel. Zimmerman v. Jones

308 Ill. 246 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1923

(People v. Burson, 307 Ill. 533 ; People v. Hanker, 197 id. 409; People v. Schnepp, 179 id. 305.) It was held by this court in People v. … The board of education was permitted to use powers in which the people and tax-payers of the district were vitally concerned, with knowledge on the part of relators of what was being done.

Stoehlke v. Hahn

158 Ill. 79 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1895

The charter of the company having provided that the business and affairs of the company shall be under the control of a board of directors, the matter of passing upon claims for losses was committed exclusively to that board … See, also, Moore v. Fitzwater, 2 Rand. 442 ; Creutz v. Hill, 89 Ky. 429 ; Bennett v. Paine, 5 Watts, 259 ; Mulholland v. Bartlett, 74 Ill. 58 ; 1 Parsons on Contracts, 439.