Case law

Brown v. Illinois Terminal Co.

319 Ill. 326 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1925

(Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Bodemer, 139 Ill. 596 ; Heidenreich v. Bremner, 260 id. 439; Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Leiner, 202 id. 624.) … (O’Neill v. Sioux City Railway Co. (Iowa) 186 N. W. 633 . See, also, Hester v. East Tennessee and W. N. C. Railroad Co. 254 Fed. 787 ; St. Louis, San Francisco and Texas Railway Co. v. Seale, supra.)

Brown v. Miner, Frost & Hubbard

128 Ill. 148 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1889

Brown, it appears, was a tenant of the premises, only, whose term had substantially expired. … (See Enos v. Capps, 12 Ill. 257 .) It is therefore not necessary to determine whether ■there was proper service on James M. Brown or not.

Brown Shoe Co. v. Gordon

405 Ill. 384 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1950

(Fash v. Gordon, 398 Ill. 210 .) … (See Local 658, Boot and Shoe Workers Union v. Brown Shoe Co. 403 Ill. 484 .)

Brown v. Commercial National Bank

42 Ill. 2d 365 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1969

Works v. McNeil, 1 Ill.2d 47, 52 . … (Turner v. Black, 19 Ill.2d 296 ; Gilbert v. Oneale, 371 Ill. 427 .) In Compher v.

Brown v. Federal Life Insurance

353 Ill. 541 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1933

Co. v. Keating, 46 Ill. 394 ; Peoria Marine and Fire Ins. Co. v. Botto, 47 id. 516 ; Ætna Ins. Co. v. Maguire, 51 id. 342; Home Ins. Co. v. Heck, 65 id. 111; Karelsen v. Sun Fire Office, 112 N. Y. 545 , 25 N. … People v. Adams, 351 Ill. 79 ; Barrett Manf. Co. v. City of Chicago, 259 id. 578; Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. Brown & Co. 254 id. 549. The judgment of the municipal court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

The PEOPLE v. Brown

25 Ill. 2d 423 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1962

Justice Klingbiel delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Nathan Brown, was indicted by the grand jury of the criminal court of Cook County for killing Lucille Fitzpatrick.

Brown v. City of Joliet

22 Ill. 123 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1859

Brown v. City of Chicago

42 Ill. 2d 501 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 28, 1969

As this court said in Kizer v. … Engle v. Kerner, 32 Ill.2d 212 ; People ex rel. Adamowski v. Wilson, 20 Ill.2d 568 ; McDougall v. Lueder, 389 Ill. 141 .)

Brown v. Trustees of Schools

224 Ill. 184 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1906

Board of Supervisors v. City of Lincoln, 81 Ill. 156 ; County of Piatt v. Goodell, 97 id. 84; School Directors v. School Directors, 105 id. 653; People ex rel. v. Town of Oran, 121 id. 650; Greenwood v. … In Greenwood v.

Board of Education v. State Board of Education

113 Ill. 2d 173 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1986

The board, citing Board of Education v. Ingels (1979), 75 Ill. App. 3d 334 , and Board of Education v. Adelman (1981), 97 Ill. App. 3d 530 , contends that the cause should be remanded. … Board of Education v. Ingels (1979), 75 Ill. App. 3d 334, 337 . In Board' of Education v. Adelman (1981), 97 Ill.

Spalding Lumber Co. v. Brown

171 Ill. 487 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1898

Brown. … (Sumner v. Waugh, 56 Ill. 531 ; Silverman v. Bullock, 98 id. 11; Himrod v. Gilman, 147 id. 293; Daniell on Neg. Inst. sec. 7266; Pomeroy’s Bq. Jur. secs. 708, 714.)

The People v. Brown

332 Ill. 277 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1928

The verdict of the jury is: “We, the jury, find the defendant, James Brown, guilty in manner and form as charged in the indictment. … And we further find from the evidence that the said defendant, James Brown, is now about the age of thirty years. Intent to rob.”

Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Brown

23 Ill. 94 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1859

Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company v. Carter, 20 Ill. R. 390. The declaration in this case was not objected to for the want of such averments, and they were traversed by the general issue.

Brown v. City of Chicago

117 Ill. 21 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 15, 1886

Ewing v. Bailey, 4 Scam. 420 ; Vairin et al. v. Edmonson, 5 Gilm. 270 ; Bowman v. Wood, 41 Ill. 203 ; Forsyth et al. v. Warren, 62 id. 68; Rev. Stat. chap. 100, entitled “Notices,” sec. 6. … The language of the statute, which was construed in Vairin et al. v.

City of Geneseo v. Brown

250 Ill. 165 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1911

In Otis v. … In Cass v.

Dustin v. Brown

303 Ill. 428 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1922

In the opinion filed at a former term (Dustin v. Brown, 297 Ill. 499 ,) we held that Mary E. … interest of Dustin in the farm and to appellant Corwine an undivided twenty-eighth part of said interest; that appellants’ contention that there was a mutual mistake in the deed and that the deed should have conveyed to Brown

Taylor v. Brown

19 Ill. 2d 359 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 18, 1960

(United Coal Companies v. Keefer Coal Co. 338 Ill. 288 .) Where the issue in the case is whether one of the parties to the contract had performed his part of the contract no freehold is involved. (Rankin v. … Reinhardt v. Matheson, 333 Ill. 56 . The cause is therefore transferred to the Appellate Court for the First District. Cause transferred.

Brown v. People

218 Ill. 361 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1905

Brown never had the power to pay this money at any time after this statute came into force, and it is insisted on his behalf that the statute, therefore, should not be construed so as to bring him within its terms. … Johnson v. People, 173 Ill. 131 . The judgment of the criminal court of Cook county will be reversed but the cause will'not be remanded. Judgment reversed.

Brown v. White

219 Ill. 632 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1906

Consolidated Coal Co. v. Peers, 150 Ill. 344 ; Westville Coal Co. v. Schwarts, 177 id. 272; Meyer v. Purcell, 214 id. 62. … We think the testimony of White shows that this receipt and certificate were issued by the wholesale firm for the identical goods which were sold by White to Brown.

Converse v. Brown

200 Ill. 166 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1902

(Winter v. Trainor, 151 Ill. 191 ; Carson v. Davis, 171 id. 497; Godschalk v. Fulmer, 176 id. 64; Havana Press Drill Co. v. Ashurst, 148 id. 115; Woodard v. Woodard, 178 id. 295.) … In Shovers v.