Case law

Vette v. Brown

334 Ill. 406 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1929

Brown v. Boyce

68 Ill. 294 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1873

Brown v. People

9 Ill. 439 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1847

Vanlandingham v. Huston, (ante, 125.) It does not appear from the record, that the instructions given by the Court were not reduced to writing.

Mills v. Brown

3 Ill. 548 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1840

Wilson, Chief Justice, Lockwood and Browne, Justices: We concur in the opinion that the judgment of the Circuit Court must be affirmed, on the ground that the bill does not set out with clearness and certainty, that Samuel … Browne, Associate Justice. Hon. Sidney Breese, Associate Justice. Hon. Thomas Ford, Associate Justice. Hon. Walter B. Sc ates, Associate Justice. Hon. Samuel H. Treat, Associate Justice. (1) The Hon. Stephen A.

The PEOPLE v. Brown

16 Ill. 2d 482 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 22, 1959

(People v. Sanders, 357 Ill. 610 .) … People v. Arbuckle, 413 Ill. 441 ; People v. Del Prete, 395 Ill. 110 ; People v. Kozlowski, 370 Ill. 639 ; People v. Bridgewater, 369 Ill. 633 .

Butterworth v. Brown

26 Ill. 156 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1861

year after maturity, without an agreement with the makers of the note, who were the real and only debtors, to extend the time of payment one year, would amount to nothing, so far as they were concerned, and the answer of Brown

Wheeler v. Brown

26 Ill. 369 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1861

Brown ? If so, then that contract of settlement was a sufficient consideration for the agreement, and a court of equity ought to enforce it for her benefit.

Webber v. Brown

38 Ill. 87 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1865

Brown, then the jury will find for the claimant.” … Brown as agent for his son, but should have been made by the claimant in person, or by an attorney at law, is not well taken. The ease of Hitt v. Smith, 3 Scam. 47 , does not apply.

Brown v. People

86 Ill. 239 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1877

Brown v. Mary J. Brown. Divorce. “And now this cause coming on for a final hearing, in said court, and the evidence being heard and it was proven that John W. Brown was married to Mary J. … Brown retain the care and custody of said child, Clara Brown, till she becomes of the age of fourteen years, and that said John W. Brown pay the costs of this case to the officers and witnesses. “ C. H.

Brown v. Pease

8 Ill. 191 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1846

Brown, the plaintiff in error, three promissory notes for $133-33 each, and payable respectively on the first days of September, October and November thereafter. … In October, 1843, the defendants in error brought this suit against Brown to recover the amount of the notes.

Finch v. Brown

8 Ill. 488 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1846

Irwin v. Brown

145 Ill. 199 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 9, 1893

Brown v. Cannon

10 Ill. 174 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1848

Without this, there is no sufficient consideration to compel Brown to act. Doyle v. Teas, 4 Scam. This the complainant has never done. … In Lowes v.

Brown v. Pierson

330 Ill. 92 · Illinois Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1928

Justice Duncan delivered the opinion of the court: Appellee, Eugene Brown, filed a bill in chancery in the circuit court of Peoria county to enjoin and restrain appellant, Milton N.

Nealy v. Brown

6 Ill. 10 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

In the case of Eyman v. The People, decided at the September term 1842, [ante, p. 8,] this Court went farther than we are now called upon to go.

The People v. Brown

354 Ill. 480 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1933

(Williams v. People, 54 Ill. 422 .) … We said in People v.

Brown v. McCord

105 Ill. 459 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1882

Brown insists that the city is not entitled to receive these taxes, and that the levy and assessment for these taxes are illegal. … Brown, having any bearing upon the question of the non-payment of city taxes for the years 1869, 1870, 1871 and 1872, respectively. It was certainly irregular to grant McCord a decree that Mrs.

Bangs v. Brown

113 Ill. 80 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1885

Bangs and her husband was a fair compensation for the board, and so disallowed the claim for board and care of her mother, except as to the sum of $100, which was allowed for extra care during her sickness. … It is satisfactorily proven the rent of the dwelling house in which complainants in the cross-bill resided, was a fair compensation for the board and care of their mother.

Brown v. People

91 Ill. 506 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

Brown v. Malledy

19 Ill. 290 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1857