Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersill

2,990 results

2.06s

  • People v. Caffey

    205 Ill. 2d 52 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2001

    The second Chambers factor was established. There is evidence to corroborate Iacullo’s statements. The third Chambers factor was not established. … The State in effect made [the witness] unavailable by refusing to grant him immunity.”

    Cited 515 timesPublished
  • Razor v. Hyundai Motor America

    222 Ill. 2d 75 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2006

    The independent approach has not been immune to criticism, of course. … However, the Act itself does not directly establish any such disclosure requirements, nor do the parties raise any arguments regarding any requirements the FTC may have established. 2 We note that all of the law review articles

    Cited 179 timesPublished
  • People v. Plank

    106 N.E.3d 995 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 24, 2018

    Statutes are presumed to be constitutional, and “[t]o overcome this presumption, the party challenging the statute must clearly establish that it violates the constitution.” … The Driver’s Weight ¶ 15 Initially the parties dispute whether a vehicle only qualifies as a “low-speed gas bicycle” when it is driven by someone who weighs 170 pounds.

    Cited 10 timesUnpublished
  • Tallman v. E.I. P.R.R. Co.

    379 Ill. 441 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1942

    The deed *Page 444 involved is in statutory form, concerning which a number of well-established rules of construction have been laid down by this court. … The principle is also clearly stated in Bauman v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Thompson

    1 Ill. 2d 468 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1953

    Appellee urges that the amendments apply only to rates, but no reason is advanced for the assertion and the context clearly refutes the claim. … The conclusion reached must, however, be qualified by the limitation that the excesses justified cannot exceed amounts which may be produced by the rate of tax authorized by the voters.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. Davis

    63 Ill. 405 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872

    All the evidence on the point considered, we are clearly of the opinion that the poll-book and certificate are impeached and are utterly unworthy of-credit, and should only he received to prove that a poll was opened at that … This afforded the means of fully establishing how every legal voter in the town actually cast his vote; and it at the same time cut off illegal votes, repeaters and all frauds on the ballot.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Watkins-Romaine

    2025 IL 130618 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2025

    As this court has clearly explained, it is the rare error that will qualify as prong two plain error. People v. Jackson, 2022 IL 127256, ¶ 27. … The plain error rule itself is a narrow and limited exception to the forfeiture doctrine, and very few errors qualify as prong two plain errors. Id.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • People v. Nieves

    193 Ill. 2d 513 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 16, 2000

    The testimony surrounding the condition of Vargas’ clothes when his body was found is clearly evidence of the physical facts and circumstances surrounding his murder. … Hudson, 157 Ill. 2d 401, 441 (1993) (the prosecutor may respond to comments by defense counsel that clearly invite a response).

    Cited 175 timesPublished
  • Mount v. Dusing

    414 Ill. 361 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1953

    To the extent that it differs from count 3, its allegations are those of a typical bill to establish a constructive trust. … Instruction No. 11 reads: “The Court instructs the jury that the capacity to comprehend a few simple details, if the estate be small, might qualify a person, in that case, to intelligently dispose of his property by will,

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • In re Marriage of Lappe

    Illinois Supreme Court · May 1, 1997

    The party challenging the constitutionality of a statute has the burden of clearly establishing its invalidity. People v. Adams, 149 Ill. 2d 331, 338 (1992); Bernier v. Burris, 113 Ill. 2d 219, 227 (1986). … Thus, the pertinent provisions of sections 10--1 and 10--10 clearly authorize the Department to intervene and petition to establish child support on behalf of Larry.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doney v. Keith

    144 Ill. 2d 353 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1991

    There is no language in section 7 — 1—3 which qualifies or modifies “territory” in such a way. … Similarly, in the instant case, objectors’ contention that exclusion of their property would not destroy the contiguity of the remaining territory is clearly contrary to the facts.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • Phillip Morris v. Byron

    Illinois Supreme Court · Aug 22, 2007

    The court finds that Philip Morris has not established that its conduct -2- is ‘specifically authorized’ by law.” … ANALYSIS The case law of this court clearly establishes that, beyond our leave to appeal docket, the use of supervisory orders is disfavored. See People ex rel. Birkett v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Deneen v. Simon

    44 L.R.A. 801 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1898

    Thus far his duties are clearly and simply ministerial. … This is a declaration of a fundamental principle, and, although one of'vital importance, it is to be understood in a limited and qualified sense.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • People v. Patterson

    154 Ill. 2d 414 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1992

    Clearly, the trial court considered what photographs were relevant to defendant’s character and background. … We therefore decline to overturn our well-established precedent.

    Cited 197 timesPublished
  • People v. Ward

    Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1999

    A defendant cannot establish reversible error by arguing that he was absent from part of the voir dire unless he can establish that he was denied a constitutional right. See People v. … right to present witnesses to establish a defense.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Municipal Employees' Annuity & Benefit Fund

    50 N.E.3d 596 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 24, 2016

    Indeed, the language in the enforcement provisions is qualified in many respects. 40 ILCS 5/8-173.1, 11-169.1 (West 2014). … Nothing in that language supports a legislative intent to establish clearly and unequivocally an enforceable contractual right of the members of the Fund to an “actuarial funding guarantee.”

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Eads v. Heritage Enterprises, Inc.

    204 Ill. 2d 92 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2003

    The Act clearly authorizes the courts to hold nursing homes liable for the actions of its employees. … If the legislature wanted to make the Act completely immune to these reform measures, it could have excluded professional health-care services in nursing homes. It did not.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Ammann v. Wabash Railroad

    391 Ill. 200 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1945

    The management of the park district is lodged in a board of commissioners duly elected and qualified under the terms of the act, and section 11 of the act (par. 266,) sets forth their powers as the corporate authorities of … If the legislature intended to deprive park districts of the right to acquire. sites for an airport and operate and maintain an airport, undoubtedly it would have clearly and positively expressed such purpose and intention

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • BONHOMME v. St. James

    361 Ill. Dec. 1 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 24, 2012

    She also contracted a recurring infection known as MRSA (multidrug resistant staphylococcus aureus) because her immune system was so weakened. ¶ 8 Yet even after Jesse's death, defendant stayed in touch with plaintiff, communicating … Despite all of this, plaintiff insists to this court she has only ever attempted to preserve counts I through IV of her second amended complaint, and that both defendant and the trial court clearly understood this.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People v. Davis

    95 Ill. 2d 1 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1983

    Nor was it introduced during the first phase of the sentencing hearing, where the State must establish the existence of an aggravating factor in order to qualify defendant for the death penalty. … We find the circumstances in the instant case clearly distinguishable from those in Enmund.

    Cited 150 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.