Case law

People v. Munson

206 Ill. 2d 104 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2002

The court also commented at length on the question of whether Tatelli could be qualified as an expert witness. … Such decisions are generally immune from claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. People v. West, 187 Ill. 2d 418, 432 (1999).

The People v. Riedel

371 Ill. 561 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1939

It clearly appears from the evidence that plaintiffs in error were trying to promote a distilling company organized under the laws of Delaware; that they got in touch with the complaining witness; that he was willing to invest … It may be that the plaintiffs in error are guilty of violating some other criminal provisions of the statute but under the record in this case there is not sufficient proof to establish the crime of obtaining money by means

In Re Eckberg

192 Ill. 2d 70 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jul 6, 2000

any established treatment plan; 4. … ANALYSIS The principles governing our review of the reports and recommendations of both the Hearing Board and the Review Board are clearly established.

People v. Davis

452 Ill. Dec. 487 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 21, 2021

In addition, where “reasonable cause exists to believe that inculpatory conversations concerning a qualified offense will occur with a specified individual or individuals within a designated period of … ¶ 40 Gervasi clearly stated that the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine did not apply because the officers were actual participants in the conversations with the defendants. 89 Ill. 2d at 530.

Kennedy v. Modern Woodmen of America

243 Ill. 560 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1910

The statement of Myrtle King Rogers reported to the appellee by her son and testified to by the appellee was clearly hearsay evidence, and we think, when admitted, became subject to the general rules of law which govern the … impeachment, the effect would be to give to the statement of Myrtle King Rogers, made ex parte and not under oath, greater potency than if she had testified to the same statement as a witness, and to make her statement thereby immune

People ex rel. Burdick v. Board of Education

166 Ill. 388 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1896

That act provided, that the board of education should appoint a treasurer to hold office for one year and until his successor should be elected and qualified, subject to removal by a vote of the majority of the board. … If two statutes are clearly repugnant to each other, the one last enacted operates as a repeal of the former; and a subsequent statute, which revises the whole subject of a former one, and is intended as a substitute for

Du Bois v. Gibbons

2 Ill. 2d 392 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1954

, and that Du Bois, a duly elected and qualified member of the council, is the duly appointed chairman; that the committee had begun certain investigations and had heard oral testimony at hearings in connection therewith; … Appellees successfully contended in the superior court that this statute is unconstitutional and void because it is a special or local law granting a special or exclusive privilege, immunity or franchise, applying only to

Long v. Long

118 Ill. 638 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1886

Long, a son of deceased, was appointed administrator of the estate, and qualified as such. … It tends, rather, to establish a mere advancement of what was deemed by the parties appellee’s share of his grandfather’s estate.

Jenks v. Industrial Commission

29 Ill. 2d 440 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1963

Lund, called by the hotel and who qualified as an expert, examined Mrs. … Therefore, we held the decision of the Commission that plaintiff failed to establish a causal connection between the accidental injury and his physical condition at the time of hearing was clearly contrary to the manifest

People Ex Rel. Phelps v. Kerstein

413 Ill. 333 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1952

Requirements for the renewal of limited certificates are clearly set forth in the statute. … In this connection appellant points out that though he qualified for office on July 31, 1951, complaint in quo warranto was not filed by the State’s Attorney until December 26, 1951.

Grais v. City of Chicago

151 Ill. 2d 197 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1992

Establishment Ordinance §2. … The special service area was defined and established by the Notice and Establishment Ordinances.

Weiss v. Beck

1 Ill. 2d 420 · Illinois Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1953

Plaintiff alleged that by their conduct Phillip and Minnie Stocke confirmed and established their agreement to adopt plaintiff and to rear him as their own son and child. … , and his findings are entitled to great weight and will not be disturbed by this court-unless clearly and palpably against the weight of the evidence.

People v. Hill

2020 IL 124595 · Illinois Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2021

The United States Supreme Court, however, has clearly recognized a few exceptions to the warrant requirement. Jones, 215 Ill. 2d at 269. ¶ 21 One exception was recognized in Carroll v. … The Act permits possession of a determinative amount of cannabis for registered, qualifying patients. 410 ILCS 130/25(a) (West 2016).

People ex rel. Espey v. Deneen

247 Ill. 289 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1910

, and the right to cumulate his votes by distributing them among the three candidates as he sees fit, is secured to the voter; and secondly, that the right of minority representation involved in that method of voting is established … It was clearly announced in that case that the political parties of this State have the right, through their senatorial committees, to determine how many candidates they will put in the field for representatives in the General

Kouzoukas v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit Fund

234 Ill. 2d 446 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 24, 2009

Although it is true that the Board’s credibility determinations should be afforded considerable weight, they are not immune from review. … In the case at bar, Kouzoukas presented evidence which established that she had chronic back pain which severely limited her ability to sit, stand, walk, drive, and wear a gunbelt.

Continental Illinois National Bank v. Lenckos

102 Ill. 2d 210 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 25, 1984

This is. clearly in violation of the Act’s goal of imposing a tax measured by net income. … Ed. 481 ], that obligations of the Federal Government are immune from state taxation.

In Re May 1991 Will County Grand Jury

152 Ill. 2d 381 · Illinois Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1992

The legislature did not subsequently enact legislation that would clearly preclude the grand jury from issuing such subpoenas. … No citizen is immune from a grand jury subpoena. United States v. Calandra (1974), 414 U.S. 338, 345 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 618 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561, 570 .

Wisnasky-Bettorf v. Pierce

358 Ill. Dec. 624 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 22, 2012

Moreover, paragraph 4 of the statute, which sets forth the information that must be included in the resolution, states: "The resolution to fill a vacancy in nomination shall be duly acknowledged before an officer qualified … To hold otherwise would be clearly against the legislative intent in making this amendment and against this state's position in favor of ballot access for candidates running for public office. See Hossfeld v.

Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp.

2019 IL 123186 · Illinois Supreme Court · Sep 4, 2019

App. 3d 809, 822 (2002). ¶ 27 Section 20 of the Act (740 ILCS 14/20 (West 2016)), the provision that creates the private right of action on which Rosenbach’s cause of action is premised, clearly follows … Likewise, if a term has a settled legal meaning, the courts will normally infer that the legislature intended to incorporate that established meaning into the law. People v. Johnson, 2013 IL 114639, ¶ 9.

Chicago Mutual Life Indemnity Ass'n v. Hunt

2 L.R.A. 549 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1889

In this counsel are clearly mistaken. … We have thus to determine from the pleadings and evidence whether any and which of the charges made are established, and whether the charges so established are legally sufficient to warrant the present proceedings and decree