Case law

Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Center, Inc. v. United States

617 F. Supp. 279 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 26, 1985

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra, 441 U.S. at 290-94 , 99 S.Ct. at 1711-13 . … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra at 316, 99 S.Ct. at 1725 . Nevertheless the Supreme Court held in Chrysler v.

Fine v. Semet

514 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 2, 1981

As set forth in a separate order relating to the admissibility of Brown’s testimony at trial, Morton Brown, defendant’s legal representative during state settlement conferences, testified that Paul’s opening remarks connected … See also Freund v.

United States v. Novaton

867 F. Supp. 1023 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 8, 1994

Accord United States v. … . -, 112 S.Ct. 191 , 116 L.Ed.2d 152 (1991); United States v.

Hanna v. WCI Communities, Inc.

348 F. Supp. 2d 1322 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 18, 2004

Then, if the plaintiff loses in front of the ALJ, he may “file a written petition for review with the Administrative Review Board (‘the Board’), which has been delegated the authority to act for the Secretary and issue final … United States v. Koenig, 912 F.2d 1190, 1192 (9th Cir.1990); See also Heggy v.

Ridley v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.

824 F. Supp. 2d 1355 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 14, 2010

See also Ford v. … Brown Marine Serv., Inc., 995 F.2d 1565 (11th Cir.1993) (same). Plaintiffs argue otherwise in their brief, claiming that Florida’s Wrongful Death Act permits a claim for loss of consortium. (DE # 18 at 3-4).

Rainville v. F/V" GEM"

351 F. Supp. 369 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 30, 1972

Snead was a “regular” crew member who lived on board as a watchman when the vessel was in port. … It has not, however, been extended to invitees, licensees or other persons on board who are not “doing a seaman’s work and incurring a seaman’s hazards.” Seas Shipping Co. v.

Corbett v. Transportation Security Administration

968 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 16, 2012

Chamizo took Plaintiffs driver’s license and boarding pass in order to photocopy them. (Id. ¶ 66.) Plaintiff did not provide consent for Chamizo to do so. (Id. ¶ 67.) … Brown v. DOJ, 169 Fed.Appx. 537, 540 (11th Cir.2006).

Williams v. Miami-Dade County

859 F. Supp. 2d 1297 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 9, 2012

Grech v. Clayton County, 335 F.3d 1326, 1329 (11th Cir.2003). … Matthews v. Columbia County, 294 F.3d 1294, 1297 (11th Cir.2002) (citing Scala v. City of Winter Park, 116 F.3d 1396, 1399 (11th Cir.1997)).

McCullough v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

268 F. Supp. 3d 1336 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 21, 2017

Id. at 761 (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)). … May 16, 2017); Brown v. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entm’t, No. 14-0147, 2015 WL 5081125 , at *5 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 27, 2015); Farber v. Tennant Truck Lines, Inc., 84 F.Supp.3d 421, 434 (E.D.

United States ex rel. Guaranty State Bank v. Okeechobee County

6 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 9, 1934

V *742 Knott, as members of the board of administration of the state of Florida, have filed their joint and several motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus, upon the ground, primarily, that the moneys involved are … The state board of administration, as held in Amos v. Mathews, 99 Fla. 1 , 126 So. 308 , is the mere fiscal agent of the several counties for the distribution of this fund.

Payne v. Jacksonville Forwarding Co.

280 F. 150 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 6, 1922

The libelant was employed by the Shipping Board as-a marine engineer to look after the machinery of this steamship and others owned by the Shipping-Board not in condition. … Quinn v. N. J. Lighterage Co. (C.

Hesterly v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

515 F. Supp. 2d 1278 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 6, 2007

Kermarec v. … Specifically, Hesterly pleads that Royal Caribbean “owed a duty to Plaintiff and passengers aboard the M/V Radiance of the Seas to properly supervise the physicians it placed on board, employed, [or] invited ----” (Amended

Doe v. Miami-Dade County

797 F. Supp. 2d 1296 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 23, 2011

See Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407-08 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … See Bryan County v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 412 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); see also Doe v. Mann, 2007 WL 604981 , *5 (M.D.Fla.

Metzler v. Bear Automotive Service Equipment Co.

19 F. Supp. 2d 1345 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 4, 1998

Also submitted was the deposition of an independent service provider who stated that when he tried to order internal circuit boards from Bear, Allen, or SPX, he was told to contact the service department because circuit boards … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).

Ross v. Lee

15 F. Supp. 972 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 14, 1936

Co. v. Pottorff, 291 U.S. 245 , 54 S.Ct. 416 , 78 L.Ed. 777 ; Marion v. Sneeden, 291 U.S. 262 , 54 S.Ct. 421 , 78 L.Ed. 787 ; Lewis v. … Cameron v. U. S., 231 U.S. 710 , 34 S.Ct. 244 , 58 L.Ed. 448 ; U. S. v. Union Pac. R. Co., 98 U.S. 569 , 25 L.Ed. 143 ; White v. U. S., 191 U.S. 545 , 24 S.Ct. 171 , 48 L.Ed. 295 ; U. S. Fid. & G. Co. v. U.

Bird v. Celebrity Cruise Line, Inc.

428 F. Supp. 2d 1275 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 4, 2005

Because “the cruise line industry is maritime commerce,” food poi *1279 soning on board a ship “has a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce.” See Doe v. … One of them, Pietrafesa v. Board of Governors for Higher Educ., 846 F.Supp. 1066, 1070-73 (D.R.I.1994), involved a cross-claim by a defendant against the manufacturer of the ship.

Pollgreen v. Morris

579 F. Supp. 711 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 24, 1984

United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394 , 100 S.Ct. 624 , 62 L.Ed.2d 575 (1980). In Furnish v. … See, e.g., Administrative Record, M/V “Crazy Horse”, decision of Board at pp. 2-3. The Board’s decision, being in accordance with the law, and not arbitrary or capricious, must be sustained.”

Rosenfeld v. Lu

766 F. Supp. 1131 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 6, 1991

In Brown-Forman Distillers v. N. Y. … In Brown-Forman Distillers v. N.Y.

Vanderwall v. United Airlines, Inc.

80 F. Supp. 3d 1324 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2015

Airlines, Ltd. v. … there was nothing “unexpected or unusual” about a bag found in an aisle during the boarding process); see also Craig v.

Dixon v. Apache Trading Corp.

601 F. Supp. 756 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 24, 1985

See Brown v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 601 F.Supp. 641 , (S.D.Fla.1985). The Court finds the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Smoky Greenhaw Cotton Co. v.