Case law

United States v. Foster

103 F. Supp. 3d 1335 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 16, 2015

The Government’s final authority, Brown v. … In addition, the authority cited by the Brown court for requiring a "full confes sion” — United States v.

Thomas v. Dade County Public Health Trust

177 F. Supp. 2d 1283 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 20, 2001

See Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 232 F.3d 836 , 842-843 (11th Cir.2000); Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364, 1368 (11th Cir. 1999); Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1562 (11th Cir.1997). … See Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 232 F.3d 836, 842-843 ; Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364 ; Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1562 .

Jackson v. Department of Public Welfare

296 F. Supp. 1341 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 25, 1968

BROWN, Chief Judge. … Brown, Chief Judge of the Fifth Circuit, hereby designate the Honorable David W. Dyer, United States Circuit Judge, and the Honorable William O.

Harris v. City of Daytona Beach

105 F. Supp. 572 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jun 23, 1952

Gaines v. … Rice v. Arnold, 340 U.S. 848 , 71 S.Ct. 77 , 95 L.Ed. 621 , reversing Supreme Court of Fla., 45 So.2d 195 . 2 . Beal v. Holcombe, 5 Cir., 193 F.2d 384 . 3 . Draper v. City of St.

United States v. Grant

476 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 19, 1979

Unit *406 ed States v. Ellis, 547 F.2d 863, 866 (5th Cir. 1977). Defendant Grant’s memorandum of law contends that his consent was not voluntary, relying principally on the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … The Magistrate also relied on Brown . However, such reliance is misplaced.

SEACOAST SANITATION LIMITED, INC. v. Broward County, Florida

275 F. Supp. 2d 1370 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 4, 2003

There, citing, inter alia, C & A Carbone, Inc. v. … See City of Hialeah v.

Avila v. Rivkind

724 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 8, 1989

In Shaughnessy v. … The Court cited Knauff v.

Deluca v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

244 F. Supp. 3d 1342 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 16, 2017

In order to board any cruise, passengers are required to check-in and accept the terms and conditions of the ticket contract. (Id. at p. 2). … See, e.g., Simpson v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 16-cv-20595-PAS; Winter v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 17-cv-20466-CMA; Beckmann v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 16-cv-22577; Brown v.

United States v. DiBernardo

552 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Dec 20, 1982

Brown, Esq., who is a close personal friend of Special Agent Livingston, contacted Dr. Carl H. Marlowe. Mr. Brown expressed a concern regarding Special Agent Livingston’s deteriorating personality. Dr. … Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 351 U.S. 115, 124 [ 76 S.Ct. 663, 667 , 100 L.Ed. 1003 ]. (Emphasis supplied). Id. at 14, 77 S.Ct. at 8 . Applying the Mesarosh reasoning in Williams v.

Bridgewater v. Carnival Corp.

286 F.R.D. 636 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 20, 2011

United States v. … Brown, which have nearly identical statements concerning communications between the parties. (Ms.

Hernandez v. Barnhart

203 F. Supp. 2d 1341 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 19, 2002

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BROWN, United States Magistrate Judge. … V.

Lear v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 7, 2021

Following the rehearsals, Plaintiff was to fly to Alaska to board the Ship, where he was to perform for a nine-month period. Brown Decl. ¶ 9; Kling Decl. ¶ 11. … (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)).

Fowler v. Wirtz

236 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 9, 1964

An unfair labor practice proceeding before the Labor Board does not commence with the complaint filed by the Regional Office of the Labor Board and conclude with the ultimate decision of the Labor Board. … McKittrick v. C. S.

Hanna v. WCI Communities, Inc.

348 F. Supp. 2d 1322 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 18, 2004

Then, if the plaintiff loses in front of the ALJ, he may “file a written petition for review with the Administrative Review Board (‘the Board’), which has been delegated the authority to act for the Secretary and issue final … United States v. Koenig, 912 F.2d 1190, 1192 (9th Cir.1990); See also Heggy v.

Law Offices La Ley Con John H. Ruiz, P.A. v. Rust Consulting, Inc.

982 F. Supp. 2d 1307 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 12, 2013

(citing Turner v. Bank of No. Am., 4 U.S. 8, 11, 4 Dall. 8 , 1 L.Ed. 718 (1799); McNutt v. Gen. … Ridder v.

Sheets v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.

132 F. Supp. 2d 1031 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 9, 2001

The Hialeah yard employed a two-board system, wherein a separate board was maintained for engineer assignments. … See Holbrook v. City of Alpharetta, Ga., 112 F.3d 1522, 1528 (11th Cir.1997); Morisky v.

S-1 BY AND THROUGH P-1 v. Turlington

646 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 23, 1986

See, e.g., Monahan v. State of Nebraska, 687 F.2d 1164, 1168 (8th Cir.1982); Riley v. Ambach, 668 F.2d 635, 640-41 (2d Cir.1981); Armstrong v. … Manecke v. School Board of Pinellas County, Florida, 762 F.2d 912, 919 (11th Cir.1985). 8 .

Prime Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Kepali Group, Inc., et al.

District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 24, 2026

As to the Crossclaims, Defendants claimed a breach of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation against Brown & Brown of Florida Inc. (“Brown”) and Norman L. … Here, the Court finds that an across-the-board reduction in hours is appropriate in this case to account for the billing deficiencies identified above.

Jimenez v. Account Services

233 F. Supp. 3d 1359 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Feb 1, 2017

Brown v. Encore Capital Grp. Inc., 2015 WL 1778380 , at *5 (N.D. Ala. Apr. 20, 2015) (citing Shepherd-Salgado v. Tyndall Fed. Credit Union, 2011 WL 5401993 , at *3 (S.D. Ala. Nov. 7, 2011)). … Brown, 2015 WL 1778380 , at *5 (citing Huertas v. Galaxy Asset Mgmt., 641 F.3d 28, 34 (3d Cir. 2011)). That said, “it is not a permissible purpose to pull a consumer’s report where no actual debt exists.” Tacoronte v.

United States ex rel. Guaranty State Bank v. Okeechobee County

6 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 9, 1934

V *742 Knott, as members of the board of administration of the state of Florida, have filed their joint and several motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus, upon the ground, primarily, that the moneys involved are … The state board of administration, as held in Amos v. Mathews, 99 Fla. 1 , 126 So. 308 , is the mere fiscal agent of the several counties for the distribution of this fund.