Case law

Anderson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

8 F.2d 428 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 9, 1925

Now the hill alleges that the defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States, and under the decision of Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cody, 166 U. S. 606 , 17 S. Ct. 703 , 41 L. … This was first decided in Hepburn v. Ellzey, 2 Cranch, 445 , 2 L. Ed. 332 , by Chief Justice Marshall, and has never been departed from.

Silva-Hernandez v. Swacina

827 F. Supp. 2d 1352 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 4, 2011

Servs., Inc. v. … Smith v. Russellville Production Credit Ass’n, 777 F.2d 1544, 1547-48 (11th Cir.1985) (quoting Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979)); Warshauer v.

The Coldwater

283 F. 146 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Aug 9, 1922

See Ingram Day Lumber Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 267 Fed. 283 . … In the case of Belknap v. Schild, 161 U. S. 10 , on pages, 16, 17, 16 Sup. Ct. 443, on page 444 ( 40 L.

Sun-Sentinel Co. v. United States Department of Homeland Security

431 F. Supp. 2d 1258 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 14, 2006

Alliance v. … The Sun-Sentinel claims that FEMA limited its FOIA request to e-mails that were "addressed” to or from Brown and not e-mails that were simply "to or from” Brown.

Branham v. Material Systems Corporation

354 F. Supp. 1048 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jan 31, 1973

Evans & Co. v. McAlpine, supra, 434 F.2d at 104 , quoting with approval City National Bank v. Vanderboom, supra, 422 F.2d at 230 n. 10. See also Mitchell v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., supra, 446 F.2d at 103 ; Kohler v. … See Herpich v. Wallace, supra, 430 F.2d at 806; Rekant v. Desser, 425 F.2d 872, 877 (5th Cir. 1970).

Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 487 Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Gimrock Construction, Inc.

974 F. Supp. 1455 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 15, 1997

At least one court has taken Deklewa to signify a change in the Board’s treatment of the adoption by conduct doctrine in the Section 8(f) setting. The Ninth Circuit in Hawaii Carpenters’ Trust Funds v. … The National Labor Relations Board’s opinions, although persuasive authority and generally followed, see U.S. Mosaic Tile Co. v. N.L.R.B., 935 F.2d 1249 (11th Cir.1991), are not binding on federal courts.

Mascolo v. Costa Crociere, SpA

726 F. Supp. 1285 · District Court, S.D. Florida · May 11, 1989

See Barbetta v. S/S Bermuda Star, 848 F.2d 1364 (5th Cir.1988), Amdur v. Zim Israel Navigation Co., 310 F.Supp. 1033 , 1969 A.M.C. 2418 (S.D.N.Y.1969). … (citing O’Brien v. Cunard Steamship Co., 154 Mass. 272 , 28 N.E. 266, 268 (1891)).

GC BY AND THROUGH WS v. Coler

673 F. Supp. 1093 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 11, 1987

The Board argues that under Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.S. 992 , 104 S.Ct. 3457 , 82 L.Ed. 2d 746 (1984), a plaintiff who asserts a valid claim under the EHA is barred from also proceeding under § 504. … Board of Education of East Windsor Regional School v. Diamond, 808 F.2d 987 , 994 n. 4 (3d Cir.1986).

MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Best Telephone Co., Inc.

898 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 26, 1994

Brown denied all of the' Defendant’s motions to compel 4 interrogatory answers. … Board of County Comrs., 783 F.Supp. 1379, 1381, 1385-86 (S.D.Fla.1992) (denying motion for leave to amend Title VII claims as futile and prejudicial to the defendant).

Hermetic Seal Corporation v. Savoy Electronics, Inc.

290 F. Supp. 240 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 15, 1967

See Amphicar Corp. of America v. … Its board of directors meets and acts independently of the parent corporation’s board of directors.

Thomas v. Dade County Public Health Trust

177 F. Supp. 2d 1283 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 20, 2001

See Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 232 F.3d 836 , 842-843 (11th Cir.2000); Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364, 1368 (11th Cir. 1999); Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1562 (11th Cir.1997). … See Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 232 F.3d 836, 842-843 ; Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364 ; Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1562 .

Platts v. Cordis Dow Corp.

558 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Mar 4, 1983

In support of its position, Defendant relies on a 1976 decision, Gorman v. University of Miami, 414 F.Supp. 1022 (S.D.Fla.1976). This reliance, however, is clearly misplaced. … Defendant fails to take notice of a 1980 United States Supreme Court decision, Mohasco Corp. v.

The Lizzie Henderson

20 F. 524 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 1, 1884

S. v. One Raft, etc., 13 Fed. Rep. 796, Judge Bond’s opinion would imply that *528 a raft should display a torch, notwithstanding she was at anchor, although the ease was disposed of on other grounds; and in McGill v. … S. v. One Raft, 13 Fed. Rep. 796; citing U. S. v. Winn, 3 Sumn. 212 ; The Enterprise, 1 Paine, 33 ; The Industry, 1 Gall. 117 .

United States v. Foster

103 F. Supp. 3d 1335 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Apr 16, 2015

The Government’s final authority, Brown v. … In addition, the authority cited by the Brown court for requiring a "full confes sion” — United States v.

Valencia v. AFFILIATED GROUP, INC.

674 F. Supp. 2d 1300 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 21, 2009

Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 , 895 and 896 n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1541 , 79 L.Ed.2d 891 (1984); NAACP v. City of Evergreen, 812 F.2d 1332, 1338 (11th cir.1987); Gaines v. Dougherty Co. … Vaughns v. Board of Education, 598 F.Supp. 1262 (D.Md.1984), aff'd, 770 F.2d 1244 (4th Cir.1985); Zeffiro v.

Jackson v. Department of Public Welfare

296 F. Supp. 1341 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 25, 1968

BROWN, Chief Judge. … Brown, Chief Judge of the Fifth Circuit, hereby designate the Honorable David W. Dyer, United States Circuit Judge, and the Honorable William O.

King Ex Rel. Estate of King v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

405 F. Supp. 2d 1374 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Oct 21, 2005

Satz v. … Ford v. Brown, 319 F.3d 1302, 1310, n. 24 (11th Cir.2003). The nuances of foreign tort law are especially obvious in this case as the Court and the parties witnessed at the two-day Italian law hearing.

Avila v. Rivkind

724 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Nov 8, 1989

In Shaughnessy v. … The Court cited Knauff v.

United States v. Grant

476 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Sep 19, 1979

Unit *406 ed States v. Ellis, 547 F.2d 863, 866 (5th Cir. 1977). Defendant Grant’s memorandum of law contends that his consent was not voluntary, relying principally on the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … The Magistrate also relied on Brown . However, such reliance is misplaced.

McCullough v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.

268 F. Supp. 3d 1336 · District Court, S.D. Florida · Jul 21, 2017

Id. at 761 (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 , 131 S.Ct. 2846 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)). … May 16, 2017); Brown v. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entm’t, No. 14-0147, 2015 WL 5081125 , at *5 (E.D. Ky. Aug. 27, 2015); Farber v. Tennant Truck Lines, Inc., 84 F.Supp.3d 421, 434 (E.D.